Relevance of the autopsy as a medical tool

A large database of physician attitudes

Jody E. Hooper, Stephen A. Geller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context. - Autopsy rates for patients dying in hospitals have declined from approximately 50% in the 1950s to 5% or less today. Objective. - To investigate the nature of physician attitudes about autopsy in a large and varied population and to relate these attitudes to certain physician demographic variables. Design. - A 10-question, anonymous, multiple-choice format questionnaire was distributed to all attending physicians at 4 hospitals: 2 that were university-affiliated (1 private and 1 public), 1 military, and 1 private nonuniversity-affiliated medical center. A total of 2608 surveys were distributed. Results. - Three hundred eighty-eight (15%) physicians responded to the survey. Respondents agreed (77%) that autopsy results could affect their future medical practice, and disagreed (73%) that the accuracy of modern diagnostic procedures makes autopsy unnecessary. Most respondents (72%) disagreed that litigation concerns play a role in the decision to request autopsy. Spearman correlation coefficients found 9 significant relationships among the survey items, with many correlations reflecting statistically significant relationships between demographic and attitudinal variables. Conclusions. - The survey data and statistical analysis confirm that respondents value the autopsy as a relevant clinical tool, in spite of declining requests. One of the most crucial factors influencing attitudes is the physician's level of experience with autopsy in training and practice. Among other interesting results was that strength of belief in autopsy relevancy correlates significantly (P = .003) with greater prior exposure to the autopsy. In a sense, the current low autopsy rates may be self-perpetuating because of the paucity of and decreasing experience with autopsy by succeeding generations of clinicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-274
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume131
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Autopsy
Databases
Physicians
Demography
Statistical Data Interpretation
Surveys and Questionnaires
antineoplaston A10
Jurisprudence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Relevance of the autopsy as a medical tool : A large database of physician attitudes. / Hooper, Jody E.; Geller, Stephen A.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 131, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 268-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2983a486c8c44a4fbb4b9c7fc95b72fe,
title = "Relevance of the autopsy as a medical tool: A large database of physician attitudes",
abstract = "Context. - Autopsy rates for patients dying in hospitals have declined from approximately 50{\%} in the 1950s to 5{\%} or less today. Objective. - To investigate the nature of physician attitudes about autopsy in a large and varied population and to relate these attitudes to certain physician demographic variables. Design. - A 10-question, anonymous, multiple-choice format questionnaire was distributed to all attending physicians at 4 hospitals: 2 that were university-affiliated (1 private and 1 public), 1 military, and 1 private nonuniversity-affiliated medical center. A total of 2608 surveys were distributed. Results. - Three hundred eighty-eight (15{\%}) physicians responded to the survey. Respondents agreed (77{\%}) that autopsy results could affect their future medical practice, and disagreed (73{\%}) that the accuracy of modern diagnostic procedures makes autopsy unnecessary. Most respondents (72{\%}) disagreed that litigation concerns play a role in the decision to request autopsy. Spearman correlation coefficients found 9 significant relationships among the survey items, with many correlations reflecting statistically significant relationships between demographic and attitudinal variables. Conclusions. - The survey data and statistical analysis confirm that respondents value the autopsy as a relevant clinical tool, in spite of declining requests. One of the most crucial factors influencing attitudes is the physician's level of experience with autopsy in training and practice. Among other interesting results was that strength of belief in autopsy relevancy correlates significantly (P = .003) with greater prior exposure to the autopsy. In a sense, the current low autopsy rates may be self-perpetuating because of the paucity of and decreasing experience with autopsy by succeeding generations of clinicians.",
author = "Hooper, {Jody E.} and Geller, {Stephen A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "268--274",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relevance of the autopsy as a medical tool

T2 - A large database of physician attitudes

AU - Hooper, Jody E.

AU - Geller, Stephen A.

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Context. - Autopsy rates for patients dying in hospitals have declined from approximately 50% in the 1950s to 5% or less today. Objective. - To investigate the nature of physician attitudes about autopsy in a large and varied population and to relate these attitudes to certain physician demographic variables. Design. - A 10-question, anonymous, multiple-choice format questionnaire was distributed to all attending physicians at 4 hospitals: 2 that were university-affiliated (1 private and 1 public), 1 military, and 1 private nonuniversity-affiliated medical center. A total of 2608 surveys were distributed. Results. - Three hundred eighty-eight (15%) physicians responded to the survey. Respondents agreed (77%) that autopsy results could affect their future medical practice, and disagreed (73%) that the accuracy of modern diagnostic procedures makes autopsy unnecessary. Most respondents (72%) disagreed that litigation concerns play a role in the decision to request autopsy. Spearman correlation coefficients found 9 significant relationships among the survey items, with many correlations reflecting statistically significant relationships between demographic and attitudinal variables. Conclusions. - The survey data and statistical analysis confirm that respondents value the autopsy as a relevant clinical tool, in spite of declining requests. One of the most crucial factors influencing attitudes is the physician's level of experience with autopsy in training and practice. Among other interesting results was that strength of belief in autopsy relevancy correlates significantly (P = .003) with greater prior exposure to the autopsy. In a sense, the current low autopsy rates may be self-perpetuating because of the paucity of and decreasing experience with autopsy by succeeding generations of clinicians.

AB - Context. - Autopsy rates for patients dying in hospitals have declined from approximately 50% in the 1950s to 5% or less today. Objective. - To investigate the nature of physician attitudes about autopsy in a large and varied population and to relate these attitudes to certain physician demographic variables. Design. - A 10-question, anonymous, multiple-choice format questionnaire was distributed to all attending physicians at 4 hospitals: 2 that were university-affiliated (1 private and 1 public), 1 military, and 1 private nonuniversity-affiliated medical center. A total of 2608 surveys were distributed. Results. - Three hundred eighty-eight (15%) physicians responded to the survey. Respondents agreed (77%) that autopsy results could affect their future medical practice, and disagreed (73%) that the accuracy of modern diagnostic procedures makes autopsy unnecessary. Most respondents (72%) disagreed that litigation concerns play a role in the decision to request autopsy. Spearman correlation coefficients found 9 significant relationships among the survey items, with many correlations reflecting statistically significant relationships between demographic and attitudinal variables. Conclusions. - The survey data and statistical analysis confirm that respondents value the autopsy as a relevant clinical tool, in spite of declining requests. One of the most crucial factors influencing attitudes is the physician's level of experience with autopsy in training and practice. Among other interesting results was that strength of belief in autopsy relevancy correlates significantly (P = .003) with greater prior exposure to the autopsy. In a sense, the current low autopsy rates may be self-perpetuating because of the paucity of and decreasing experience with autopsy by succeeding generations of clinicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846980752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846980752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 268

EP - 274

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 2

ER -