"Relative" adrenal insufficiency in critical illness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To present a recommended approach to the problem of "relative" adrenal insufficiency (RAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We examine historical data that support the traditional concepts of adrenal insufficiency and the idea that the increase in cortisol secretion during stress is needed to survive the stress. The controversial use of treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with sepsis and septic shock in the ICU (and thus survival benefit) is also briefly discussed. Results: During the past decade, the concept of RAI as the failure of cortisol secretion to increase in response to stress to sustain the patient through that stress has gained strength. In some studies, it has been suggested that as many as 75% of patients in an ICU setting have RAI. Experimental support for the concept is not possible because there is no clinically useful laboratory measure of GC action. Therefore, diagnosis is generally based on interpretation of the cosyntropin stimulation test. Conclusion: The best clinical judgment should always guide interpretation of any test results, and sharp categorization of patients on the basis of a single cutoff criterion should be avoided. Overall, the concept of RAI has no clinical utility. In these cases, administration of GCs adds cost without benefit and with increased risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)632-640
Number of pages9
JournalEndocrine Practice
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Adrenal Insufficiency
Critical Illness
Glucocorticoids
Intensive Care Units
Hydrocortisone
Cosyntropin
Septic Shock
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Sepsis
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

"Relative" adrenal insufficiency in critical illness. / Fleseriu, Maria; Loriaux, Donald (Lynn).

In: Endocrine Practice, Vol. 15, No. 6, 09.2009, p. 632-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44ff02ac6a4b4b519097b7d08ad018c1,
title = "{"}Relative{"} adrenal insufficiency in critical illness",
abstract = "Objective: To present a recommended approach to the problem of {"}relative{"} adrenal insufficiency (RAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We examine historical data that support the traditional concepts of adrenal insufficiency and the idea that the increase in cortisol secretion during stress is needed to survive the stress. The controversial use of treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with sepsis and septic shock in the ICU (and thus survival benefit) is also briefly discussed. Results: During the past decade, the concept of RAI as the failure of cortisol secretion to increase in response to stress to sustain the patient through that stress has gained strength. In some studies, it has been suggested that as many as 75{\%} of patients in an ICU setting have RAI. Experimental support for the concept is not possible because there is no clinically useful laboratory measure of GC action. Therefore, diagnosis is generally based on interpretation of the cosyntropin stimulation test. Conclusion: The best clinical judgment should always guide interpretation of any test results, and sharp categorization of patients on the basis of a single cutoff criterion should be avoided. Overall, the concept of RAI has no clinical utility. In these cases, administration of GCs adds cost without benefit and with increased risk.",
author = "Maria Fleseriu and Loriaux, {Donald (Lynn)}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.4158/EP09180.RA",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "632--640",
journal = "Endocrine Practice",
issn = "1530-891X",
publisher = "American Association of Clinical Endocrinology",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Relative" adrenal insufficiency in critical illness

AU - Fleseriu, Maria

AU - Loriaux, Donald (Lynn)

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Objective: To present a recommended approach to the problem of "relative" adrenal insufficiency (RAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We examine historical data that support the traditional concepts of adrenal insufficiency and the idea that the increase in cortisol secretion during stress is needed to survive the stress. The controversial use of treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with sepsis and septic shock in the ICU (and thus survival benefit) is also briefly discussed. Results: During the past decade, the concept of RAI as the failure of cortisol secretion to increase in response to stress to sustain the patient through that stress has gained strength. In some studies, it has been suggested that as many as 75% of patients in an ICU setting have RAI. Experimental support for the concept is not possible because there is no clinically useful laboratory measure of GC action. Therefore, diagnosis is generally based on interpretation of the cosyntropin stimulation test. Conclusion: The best clinical judgment should always guide interpretation of any test results, and sharp categorization of patients on the basis of a single cutoff criterion should be avoided. Overall, the concept of RAI has no clinical utility. In these cases, administration of GCs adds cost without benefit and with increased risk.

AB - Objective: To present a recommended approach to the problem of "relative" adrenal insufficiency (RAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We examine historical data that support the traditional concepts of adrenal insufficiency and the idea that the increase in cortisol secretion during stress is needed to survive the stress. The controversial use of treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with sepsis and septic shock in the ICU (and thus survival benefit) is also briefly discussed. Results: During the past decade, the concept of RAI as the failure of cortisol secretion to increase in response to stress to sustain the patient through that stress has gained strength. In some studies, it has been suggested that as many as 75% of patients in an ICU setting have RAI. Experimental support for the concept is not possible because there is no clinically useful laboratory measure of GC action. Therefore, diagnosis is generally based on interpretation of the cosyntropin stimulation test. Conclusion: The best clinical judgment should always guide interpretation of any test results, and sharp categorization of patients on the basis of a single cutoff criterion should be avoided. Overall, the concept of RAI has no clinical utility. In these cases, administration of GCs adds cost without benefit and with increased risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75549089779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75549089779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4158/EP09180.RA

DO - 10.4158/EP09180.RA

M3 - Article

C2 - 19625244

AN - SCOPUS:75549089779

VL - 15

SP - 632

EP - 640

JO - Endocrine Practice

JF - Endocrine Practice

SN - 1530-891X

IS - 6

ER -