Relationship between response and dose in published, contemporary phase i oncology trials

Antonious Hazim, Gordon Mills, Vinay Prasad, Alyson Haslam, Emerson Y. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Background: As progress continues in oncology drug development, this study aimed to examine whether the previously established association between drug dose and efficacy in the era of cytotoxic therapies remains true in today’s phase I dose-escalation oncology trials. Methods: A systematic review of early-phase dose-finding trials of single-agent oncology drugs from 2015 to 2018 was conducted to examine the relationship between drug dose and objective responses. Cancer-specific trials were included if they determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Data related to the study drug, study design, treatment response, cancer type, dose levels, MTD, and RP2D were all collected. Dose level was categorized into 4 categories (#40%, 41%–80%, 81%–120%, and .120% of the RP2D) and was further analyzed by class of drug. Results: A total of 175 phase I studies were identified, with a total of 7,330 patients showing a median response rate of 5% (range, 0%–83%) across trials. A total of 93 trials with 2,506 participants had response data corresponding to drug dose level. In this subset, the median response rate was 5% (range, 0%–83%) across trials. Across all participants in this subset, the response rate was 12% (57 of 491) among those in the dose range of #40% of RP2D, 17% (95 of 562) among those in 41% to 80% of RP2D, 23% (272 of 1,206) among those in 81% to 120% of RP2D, and 29% (71 of 247) among those in .120% of RP2D (P,.001). The response rate at #40% of RP2D for targeted antibody was 5%, 4% for cellular therapy, 19% for immunotherapy, and 21% for small-molecule targeted inhibitors. Conclusions: Whereas our study of published phase I trials continued to show a low response rate consistent with earlier studies, the relationship between response and dose does not always peak at 81% to 120% of RP2D anymore, likely due to the use of novel immunotherapy and targeted agents with distinct efficacy and toxicity patterns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)428-433
Number of pages6
JournalJNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between response and dose in published, contemporary phase i oncology trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this