Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles

L. M. Nashner, Paul Cordo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

173 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study contrasts the properties of compensatory postural adjustments in response to movements of the support surface with those of reaction-time voluntary movements in human subjects. Subjects stood upon a six degrees-of-freedom movable platform and performed tone and movement-triggered voluntary sways about the ankle joints both under conditions of postural stability and instability. These triggered movements could be executed as rapidly as postural adjustments to support surface perturbations (80-120 ms), but only when the former were well practiced, single-choice (direction) and were performed under conditions of postural stability. Evaluation of the properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time voluntary movements revealed a number of clear organizational differences between the two categories of movement, but most interesting was the finding that, when reaction-time movements were triggered by or at the onset of platform movement, the postural adjustment always occurred first. Only when subjects were given a tone trigger 50 ms in advance of platform movement were they able to execute the reaction-time movement first. We found that the dichotomous voluntary/reflexive classification of movements was not consistent with all of the identified properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time movements. Instead, we find a system which classifies movements by function, as either stabilizating or orientational adjustments, to be more useful. In the context of whole-body movement then, intentional focal components would be closely associated with others directed towards postural stabilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-405
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume43
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1981

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Reaction Time
Leg
Muscles
Ankle Joint

Keywords

  • Reaction-time movements
  • Stance/posture control
  • Standing humans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles. / Nashner, L. M.; Cordo, Paul.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 43, No. 3-4, 08.1981, p. 395-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29aadec002d446daa0643a61ef36b185,
title = "Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles",
abstract = "This study contrasts the properties of compensatory postural adjustments in response to movements of the support surface with those of reaction-time voluntary movements in human subjects. Subjects stood upon a six degrees-of-freedom movable platform and performed tone and movement-triggered voluntary sways about the ankle joints both under conditions of postural stability and instability. These triggered movements could be executed as rapidly as postural adjustments to support surface perturbations (80-120 ms), but only when the former were well practiced, single-choice (direction) and were performed under conditions of postural stability. Evaluation of the properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time voluntary movements revealed a number of clear organizational differences between the two categories of movement, but most interesting was the finding that, when reaction-time movements were triggered by or at the onset of platform movement, the postural adjustment always occurred first. Only when subjects were given a tone trigger 50 ms in advance of platform movement were they able to execute the reaction-time movement first. We found that the dichotomous voluntary/reflexive classification of movements was not consistent with all of the identified properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time movements. Instead, we find a system which classifies movements by function, as either stabilizating or orientational adjustments, to be more useful. In the context of whole-body movement then, intentional focal components would be closely associated with others directed towards postural stabilization.",
keywords = "Reaction-time movements, Stance/posture control, Standing humans",
author = "Nashner, {L. M.} and Paul Cordo",
year = "1981",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/BF00238382",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "395--405",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles

AU - Nashner, L. M.

AU - Cordo, Paul

PY - 1981/8

Y1 - 1981/8

N2 - This study contrasts the properties of compensatory postural adjustments in response to movements of the support surface with those of reaction-time voluntary movements in human subjects. Subjects stood upon a six degrees-of-freedom movable platform and performed tone and movement-triggered voluntary sways about the ankle joints both under conditions of postural stability and instability. These triggered movements could be executed as rapidly as postural adjustments to support surface perturbations (80-120 ms), but only when the former were well practiced, single-choice (direction) and were performed under conditions of postural stability. Evaluation of the properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time voluntary movements revealed a number of clear organizational differences between the two categories of movement, but most interesting was the finding that, when reaction-time movements were triggered by or at the onset of platform movement, the postural adjustment always occurred first. Only when subjects were given a tone trigger 50 ms in advance of platform movement were they able to execute the reaction-time movement first. We found that the dichotomous voluntary/reflexive classification of movements was not consistent with all of the identified properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time movements. Instead, we find a system which classifies movements by function, as either stabilizating or orientational adjustments, to be more useful. In the context of whole-body movement then, intentional focal components would be closely associated with others directed towards postural stabilization.

AB - This study contrasts the properties of compensatory postural adjustments in response to movements of the support surface with those of reaction-time voluntary movements in human subjects. Subjects stood upon a six degrees-of-freedom movable platform and performed tone and movement-triggered voluntary sways about the ankle joints both under conditions of postural stability and instability. These triggered movements could be executed as rapidly as postural adjustments to support surface perturbations (80-120 ms), but only when the former were well practiced, single-choice (direction) and were performed under conditions of postural stability. Evaluation of the properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time voluntary movements revealed a number of clear organizational differences between the two categories of movement, but most interesting was the finding that, when reaction-time movements were triggered by or at the onset of platform movement, the postural adjustment always occurred first. Only when subjects were given a tone trigger 50 ms in advance of platform movement were they able to execute the reaction-time movement first. We found that the dichotomous voluntary/reflexive classification of movements was not consistent with all of the identified properties of postural adjustments and reaction-time movements. Instead, we find a system which classifies movements by function, as either stabilizating or orientational adjustments, to be more useful. In the context of whole-body movement then, intentional focal components would be closely associated with others directed towards postural stabilization.

KW - Reaction-time movements

KW - Stance/posture control

KW - Standing humans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019520521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019520521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00238382

DO - 10.1007/BF00238382

M3 - Article

C2 - 7262232

AN - SCOPUS:0019520521

VL - 43

SP - 395

EP - 405

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 3-4

ER -