Regulating and paying for hospice and palliative care: Reflections on the medicare hospice benefit

Vincent Mor, Joan Teno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hospice began as a social movement outside of mainstream medicine with the goal of helping those dying alone and in unbearable pain in health care institutions. The National Hospice Study, undertaken to test whether hospice improved dying cancer patients' quality of life while saving Medicare money, found hospice care achieved comparable outcomes to traditional cancer care and was less costly as long as hospice lengths of stay were not too long. In 1982, before study results were final, Congress created a Medicare hospice benefit under a capitated per diem payment system restricting further treatment. In 1986 the benefit was extended to beneficiaries living in nursing homes. This change resulted in longer average lengths of stay, explosive growth in the number of hospices, particularly of the for-profit variety, and increases in total Medicare expenditures on hospice care. An increasingly high proportion of beneficiaries receive hospice care. However, over 30 percent are served fewer than seven days before they die, while very long stays are also increasingly common. These and other factors raise quality concerns about hospice being disconnected from the rest of the health care system. We offer suggestions regarding how hospice could be better integrated into the broader health care delivery system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-716
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospice Care
Hospices
Medicare
Palliative Care
Delivery of Health Care
Length of Stay
Health Expenditures
Nursing Homes
Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Medicine
Pain

Keywords

  • Hospice
  • Medicare
  • National hospice study
  • Policy analysis
  • Quality at the end of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Regulating and paying for hospice and palliative care : Reflections on the medicare hospice benefit. / Mor, Vincent; Teno, Joan.

In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 697-716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a32d49a836704062862bd81438620988,
title = "Regulating and paying for hospice and palliative care: Reflections on the medicare hospice benefit",
abstract = "Hospice began as a social movement outside of mainstream medicine with the goal of helping those dying alone and in unbearable pain in health care institutions. The National Hospice Study, undertaken to test whether hospice improved dying cancer patients' quality of life while saving Medicare money, found hospice care achieved comparable outcomes to traditional cancer care and was less costly as long as hospice lengths of stay were not too long. In 1982, before study results were final, Congress created a Medicare hospice benefit under a capitated per diem payment system restricting further treatment. In 1986 the benefit was extended to beneficiaries living in nursing homes. This change resulted in longer average lengths of stay, explosive growth in the number of hospices, particularly of the for-profit variety, and increases in total Medicare expenditures on hospice care. An increasingly high proportion of beneficiaries receive hospice care. However, over 30 percent are served fewer than seven days before they die, while very long stays are also increasingly common. These and other factors raise quality concerns about hospice being disconnected from the rest of the health care system. We offer suggestions regarding how hospice could be better integrated into the broader health care delivery system.",
keywords = "Hospice, Medicare, National hospice study, Policy analysis, Quality at the end of life",
author = "Vincent Mor and Joan Teno",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-3620893",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "697--716",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating and paying for hospice and palliative care

T2 - Reflections on the medicare hospice benefit

AU - Mor, Vincent

AU - Teno, Joan

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Hospice began as a social movement outside of mainstream medicine with the goal of helping those dying alone and in unbearable pain in health care institutions. The National Hospice Study, undertaken to test whether hospice improved dying cancer patients' quality of life while saving Medicare money, found hospice care achieved comparable outcomes to traditional cancer care and was less costly as long as hospice lengths of stay were not too long. In 1982, before study results were final, Congress created a Medicare hospice benefit under a capitated per diem payment system restricting further treatment. In 1986 the benefit was extended to beneficiaries living in nursing homes. This change resulted in longer average lengths of stay, explosive growth in the number of hospices, particularly of the for-profit variety, and increases in total Medicare expenditures on hospice care. An increasingly high proportion of beneficiaries receive hospice care. However, over 30 percent are served fewer than seven days before they die, while very long stays are also increasingly common. These and other factors raise quality concerns about hospice being disconnected from the rest of the health care system. We offer suggestions regarding how hospice could be better integrated into the broader health care delivery system.

AB - Hospice began as a social movement outside of mainstream medicine with the goal of helping those dying alone and in unbearable pain in health care institutions. The National Hospice Study, undertaken to test whether hospice improved dying cancer patients' quality of life while saving Medicare money, found hospice care achieved comparable outcomes to traditional cancer care and was less costly as long as hospice lengths of stay were not too long. In 1982, before study results were final, Congress created a Medicare hospice benefit under a capitated per diem payment system restricting further treatment. In 1986 the benefit was extended to beneficiaries living in nursing homes. This change resulted in longer average lengths of stay, explosive growth in the number of hospices, particularly of the for-profit variety, and increases in total Medicare expenditures on hospice care. An increasingly high proportion of beneficiaries receive hospice care. However, over 30 percent are served fewer than seven days before they die, while very long stays are also increasingly common. These and other factors raise quality concerns about hospice being disconnected from the rest of the health care system. We offer suggestions regarding how hospice could be better integrated into the broader health care delivery system.

KW - Hospice

KW - Medicare

KW - National hospice study

KW - Policy analysis

KW - Quality at the end of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983036498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983036498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-3620893

DO - 10.1215/03616878-3620893

M3 - Article

C2 - 27127256

AN - SCOPUS:84983036498

VL - 41

SP - 697

EP - 716

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 4

ER -