Reflections of a reluctant clinical ethicist: Ethics consultation and the collapse of critical distance

David Barnard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The obvious appeal and growing momentum of clinical ethics in academic medical centers should not blind us to a potential danger: the collapse of critical distance. The very integration into the clinical milieu and the processes of clinical decision making, that clinical ethics claims as its greatest success, carries the seeds of a dilution of ethics' critical stance toward medicine and medical education. The purpose of this paper is to suggest how this might occur, and what potential contributions of ethics to medicine might be sacrificed as a result. Medical sociology will be used for comparison. Sociologists have found that they may function either as students and critics of established medical practices and educational philosophies, or as collaborative participants in them - but rarely both. It may be that professional ethics is most effective when it plays the role of 'stranger' rather than insider, and is continually able to question the most basic assumptions and values of the enterprise with which it is associated. As with medical sociology, ethics and humanities must ask to what extent their desire for acceptance in the clinic requires their acceptance of the clinic: specifically, acceptance of basic assumptions about optimal ways of organizing medical education, socializing physicians-in-training, providing care, and even of defining medical ethics itself. The paper concludes by recommending that ethics reassert its 'strangeness' in the medical milieu even as it assumes a more prominent role within the medical center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-22
Number of pages8
JournalTheoretical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethics Consultation
Clinical Ethics
Ethicists
Medical Sociology
Ethics
Medical Ethics
Medical Education
Professional Ethics
Medicine
Seeds
Students
Physicians

Keywords

  • clinical ethics
  • critical distance
  • ethicist
  • ethics consultation
  • medical sociology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Reflections of a reluctant clinical ethicist : Ethics consultation and the collapse of critical distance. / Barnard, David.

In: Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 1, 03.1992, p. 15-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf287df5d0734473ab8b6c9c671ef5a2,
title = "Reflections of a reluctant clinical ethicist: Ethics consultation and the collapse of critical distance",
abstract = "The obvious appeal and growing momentum of clinical ethics in academic medical centers should not blind us to a potential danger: the collapse of critical distance. The very integration into the clinical milieu and the processes of clinical decision making, that clinical ethics claims as its greatest success, carries the seeds of a dilution of ethics' critical stance toward medicine and medical education. The purpose of this paper is to suggest how this might occur, and what potential contributions of ethics to medicine might be sacrificed as a result. Medical sociology will be used for comparison. Sociologists have found that they may function either as students and critics of established medical practices and educational philosophies, or as collaborative participants in them - but rarely both. It may be that professional ethics is most effective when it plays the role of 'stranger' rather than insider, and is continually able to question the most basic assumptions and values of the enterprise with which it is associated. As with medical sociology, ethics and humanities must ask to what extent their desire for acceptance in the clinic requires their acceptance of the clinic: specifically, acceptance of basic assumptions about optimal ways of organizing medical education, socializing physicians-in-training, providing care, and even of defining medical ethics itself. The paper concludes by recommending that ethics reassert its 'strangeness' in the medical milieu even as it assumes a more prominent role within the medical center.",
keywords = "clinical ethics, critical distance, ethicist, ethics consultation, medical sociology",
author = "David Barnard",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF00489216",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "15--22",
journal = "Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics",
issn = "1386-7415",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections of a reluctant clinical ethicist

T2 - Ethics consultation and the collapse of critical distance

AU - Barnard, David

PY - 1992/3

Y1 - 1992/3

N2 - The obvious appeal and growing momentum of clinical ethics in academic medical centers should not blind us to a potential danger: the collapse of critical distance. The very integration into the clinical milieu and the processes of clinical decision making, that clinical ethics claims as its greatest success, carries the seeds of a dilution of ethics' critical stance toward medicine and medical education. The purpose of this paper is to suggest how this might occur, and what potential contributions of ethics to medicine might be sacrificed as a result. Medical sociology will be used for comparison. Sociologists have found that they may function either as students and critics of established medical practices and educational philosophies, or as collaborative participants in them - but rarely both. It may be that professional ethics is most effective when it plays the role of 'stranger' rather than insider, and is continually able to question the most basic assumptions and values of the enterprise with which it is associated. As with medical sociology, ethics and humanities must ask to what extent their desire for acceptance in the clinic requires their acceptance of the clinic: specifically, acceptance of basic assumptions about optimal ways of organizing medical education, socializing physicians-in-training, providing care, and even of defining medical ethics itself. The paper concludes by recommending that ethics reassert its 'strangeness' in the medical milieu even as it assumes a more prominent role within the medical center.

AB - The obvious appeal and growing momentum of clinical ethics in academic medical centers should not blind us to a potential danger: the collapse of critical distance. The very integration into the clinical milieu and the processes of clinical decision making, that clinical ethics claims as its greatest success, carries the seeds of a dilution of ethics' critical stance toward medicine and medical education. The purpose of this paper is to suggest how this might occur, and what potential contributions of ethics to medicine might be sacrificed as a result. Medical sociology will be used for comparison. Sociologists have found that they may function either as students and critics of established medical practices and educational philosophies, or as collaborative participants in them - but rarely both. It may be that professional ethics is most effective when it plays the role of 'stranger' rather than insider, and is continually able to question the most basic assumptions and values of the enterprise with which it is associated. As with medical sociology, ethics and humanities must ask to what extent their desire for acceptance in the clinic requires their acceptance of the clinic: specifically, acceptance of basic assumptions about optimal ways of organizing medical education, socializing physicians-in-training, providing care, and even of defining medical ethics itself. The paper concludes by recommending that ethics reassert its 'strangeness' in the medical milieu even as it assumes a more prominent role within the medical center.

KW - clinical ethics

KW - critical distance

KW - ethicist

KW - ethics consultation

KW - medical sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026507391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026507391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00489216

DO - 10.1007/BF00489216

M3 - Article

C2 - 1604429

AN - SCOPUS:0026507391

VL - 13

SP - 15

EP - 22

JO - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

JF - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

SN - 1386-7415

IS - 1

ER -