Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: Presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery

David M. Poetker, Jamie R. Litvack, Jess C. Mace, Timothy Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) represent a challenging subset of patients with rhinosinusitis. Data regarding the outcomes of care for these patients is extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objective and patient-based measures in patients diagnosed with RARS before and after surgical intervention. Methods: A prospective, nested case-control study was performed. Cases of RARS (n = 22) were matched to patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyposis (n = 22) by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and pre- and postoperative endoscopic examinations, the Chronic Sinusitis Survey, and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index were scored and compared between cases and controls. Results: Patients with RARS were less likely to have asthma or previous sinus surgery. Patients with CRS underwent more extensive surgery. There were no significant differences in preoperative CT, endoscopy, or patient-based, quality-of-life (QOL) scores. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in total postoperative QOL scores. Patients with CRS showed significant improvement on endoscopy scores. Patients with RARS used significantly fewer sinus medications after endoscopic sinus surgery. Conclusion: Patients with RARS were more often primary surgical patients and underwent less extensive surgery than their CRS counterparts. Both groups reported improved QOL after surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-333
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Endoscopy
Tomography
Sinusitis
Case-Control Studies
Patient Care
Asthma
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Outcomes
  • Quality of life
  • Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis
  • Rhinosinusitis
  • Sinus surgery
  • Sinusitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis : Presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery. / Poetker, David M.; Litvack, Jamie R.; Mace, Jess C.; Smith, Timothy.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 329-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poetker, David M. ; Litvack, Jamie R. ; Mace, Jess C. ; Smith, Timothy. / Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis : Presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 329-333.
@article{3fa05f0cc10848649b4e0ef1c2348336,
title = "Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: Presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery",
abstract = "Background: Patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) represent a challenging subset of patients with rhinosinusitis. Data regarding the outcomes of care for these patients is extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objective and patient-based measures in patients diagnosed with RARS before and after surgical intervention. Methods: A prospective, nested case-control study was performed. Cases of RARS (n = 22) were matched to patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyposis (n = 22) by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and pre- and postoperative endoscopic examinations, the Chronic Sinusitis Survey, and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index were scored and compared between cases and controls. Results: Patients with RARS were less likely to have asthma or previous sinus surgery. Patients with CRS underwent more extensive surgery. There were no significant differences in preoperative CT, endoscopy, or patient-based, quality-of-life (QOL) scores. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in total postoperative QOL scores. Patients with CRS showed significant improvement on endoscopy scores. Patients with RARS used significantly fewer sinus medications after endoscopic sinus surgery. Conclusion: Patients with RARS were more often primary surgical patients and underwent less extensive surgery than their CRS counterparts. Both groups reported improved QOL after surgery.",
keywords = "Endoscopic sinus surgery, Outcomes, Quality of life, Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis, Rhinosinusitis, Sinus surgery, Sinusitis",
author = "Poetker, {David M.} and Litvack, {Jamie R.} and Mace, {Jess C.} and Timothy Smith",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3177",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "329--333",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis

T2 - Presentation and outcomes of sinus surgery

AU - Poetker, David M.

AU - Litvack, Jamie R.

AU - Mace, Jess C.

AU - Smith, Timothy

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Background: Patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) represent a challenging subset of patients with rhinosinusitis. Data regarding the outcomes of care for these patients is extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objective and patient-based measures in patients diagnosed with RARS before and after surgical intervention. Methods: A prospective, nested case-control study was performed. Cases of RARS (n = 22) were matched to patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyposis (n = 22) by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and pre- and postoperative endoscopic examinations, the Chronic Sinusitis Survey, and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index were scored and compared between cases and controls. Results: Patients with RARS were less likely to have asthma or previous sinus surgery. Patients with CRS underwent more extensive surgery. There were no significant differences in preoperative CT, endoscopy, or patient-based, quality-of-life (QOL) scores. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in total postoperative QOL scores. Patients with CRS showed significant improvement on endoscopy scores. Patients with RARS used significantly fewer sinus medications after endoscopic sinus surgery. Conclusion: Patients with RARS were more often primary surgical patients and underwent less extensive surgery than their CRS counterparts. Both groups reported improved QOL after surgery.

AB - Background: Patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) represent a challenging subset of patients with rhinosinusitis. Data regarding the outcomes of care for these patients is extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objective and patient-based measures in patients diagnosed with RARS before and after surgical intervention. Methods: A prospective, nested case-control study was performed. Cases of RARS (n = 22) were matched to patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyposis (n = 22) by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and pre- and postoperative endoscopic examinations, the Chronic Sinusitis Survey, and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index were scored and compared between cases and controls. Results: Patients with RARS were less likely to have asthma or previous sinus surgery. Patients with CRS underwent more extensive surgery. There were no significant differences in preoperative CT, endoscopy, or patient-based, quality-of-life (QOL) scores. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in total postoperative QOL scores. Patients with CRS showed significant improvement on endoscopy scores. Patients with RARS used significantly fewer sinus medications after endoscopic sinus surgery. Conclusion: Patients with RARS were more often primary surgical patients and underwent less extensive surgery than their CRS counterparts. Both groups reported improved QOL after surgery.

KW - Endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - Outcomes

KW - Quality of life

KW - Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis

KW - Rhinosinusitis

KW - Sinus surgery

KW - Sinusitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45349104530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45349104530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3177

DO - 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3177

M3 - Article

C2 - 18588769

AN - SCOPUS:45349104530

VL - 22

SP - 329

EP - 333

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 3

ER -