Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples

Akash A. Kapadia, Marcus Anthony, Ann Martinez Acevedo, Eugene Fuchs, Jason Hedges, Kevin A. Ostrowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To provide pregnancy and live birth rates from a contemporary series of vasectomy reversals in men with female partners aged ≥35 years and to correlate the results with IVF. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Design: Retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected database. Patient(s): Two hundred forty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal for fertility with female partner aged ≥35 years. Intervention(s): Vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Correlation of pregnancy and live birth rate of this cohort by age groups with most recently published pregnancy and live birth rate per IVF cycle. Result(s): One hundred thirty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal between 2006 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. Overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 35% and 30%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by female age groups (35–37, 38–40, >40 years) demonstrated pregnancy and live birth rates comparable to those per IVF cycle by age groups according to a recently published (2015) national report. Conclusion(s): Vasectomy reversal should be strongly considered in men with a partner aged ≤40 years. Additionally, vasectomy reversal can be considered in carefully selected patients even with a partner aged >40 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1020-1024
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume109
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Vasovasostomy
Reproduction
Pregnancy Rate
Age Groups
Tertiary Care Centers
Fertility
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

Keywords

  • ICSI
  • vasectomy reversal
  • vasoepididymostomy
  • vasovasostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples. / Kapadia, Akash A.; Anthony, Marcus; Martinez Acevedo, Ann; Fuchs, Eugene; Hedges, Jason; Ostrowski, Kevin A.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 109, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 1020-1024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kapadia, Akash A. ; Anthony, Marcus ; Martinez Acevedo, Ann ; Fuchs, Eugene ; Hedges, Jason ; Ostrowski, Kevin A. / Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2018 ; Vol. 109, No. 6. pp. 1020-1024.
@article{af69f4cd53b04060ae6333ac1f8ccf62,
title = "Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples",
abstract = "Objective: To provide pregnancy and live birth rates from a contemporary series of vasectomy reversals in men with female partners aged ≥35 years and to correlate the results with IVF. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Design: Retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected database. Patient(s): Two hundred forty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal for fertility with female partner aged ≥35 years. Intervention(s): Vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Correlation of pregnancy and live birth rate of this cohort by age groups with most recently published pregnancy and live birth rate per IVF cycle. Result(s): One hundred thirty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal between 2006 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. Overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 35{\%} and 30{\%}, respectively. Subgroup analysis by female age groups (35–37, 38–40, >40 years) demonstrated pregnancy and live birth rates comparable to those per IVF cycle by age groups according to a recently published (2015) national report. Conclusion(s): Vasectomy reversal should be strongly considered in men with a partner aged ≤40 years. Additionally, vasectomy reversal can be considered in carefully selected patients even with a partner aged >40 years.",
keywords = "ICSI, vasectomy reversal, vasoepididymostomy, vasovasostomy",
author = "Kapadia, {Akash A.} and Marcus Anthony and {Martinez Acevedo}, Ann and Eugene Fuchs and Jason Hedges and Ostrowski, {Kevin A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "1020--1024",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples

AU - Kapadia, Akash A.

AU - Anthony, Marcus

AU - Martinez Acevedo, Ann

AU - Fuchs, Eugene

AU - Hedges, Jason

AU - Ostrowski, Kevin A.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Objective: To provide pregnancy and live birth rates from a contemporary series of vasectomy reversals in men with female partners aged ≥35 years and to correlate the results with IVF. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Design: Retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected database. Patient(s): Two hundred forty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal for fertility with female partner aged ≥35 years. Intervention(s): Vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Correlation of pregnancy and live birth rate of this cohort by age groups with most recently published pregnancy and live birth rate per IVF cycle. Result(s): One hundred thirty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal between 2006 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. Overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 35% and 30%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by female age groups (35–37, 38–40, >40 years) demonstrated pregnancy and live birth rates comparable to those per IVF cycle by age groups according to a recently published (2015) national report. Conclusion(s): Vasectomy reversal should be strongly considered in men with a partner aged ≤40 years. Additionally, vasectomy reversal can be considered in carefully selected patients even with a partner aged >40 years.

AB - Objective: To provide pregnancy and live birth rates from a contemporary series of vasectomy reversals in men with female partners aged ≥35 years and to correlate the results with IVF. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Design: Retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected database. Patient(s): Two hundred forty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal for fertility with female partner aged ≥35 years. Intervention(s): Vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Correlation of pregnancy and live birth rate of this cohort by age groups with most recently published pregnancy and live birth rate per IVF cycle. Result(s): One hundred thirty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal between 2006 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. Overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 35% and 30%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by female age groups (35–37, 38–40, >40 years) demonstrated pregnancy and live birth rates comparable to those per IVF cycle by age groups according to a recently published (2015) national report. Conclusion(s): Vasectomy reversal should be strongly considered in men with a partner aged ≤40 years. Additionally, vasectomy reversal can be considered in carefully selected patients even with a partner aged >40 years.

KW - ICSI

KW - vasectomy reversal

KW - vasoepididymostomy

KW - vasovasostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048713213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048713213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.118

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.118

M3 - Article

C2 - 29935639

AN - SCOPUS:85048713213

VL - 109

SP - 1020

EP - 1024

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 6

ER -