Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: A qualitative study

Joan Ash, Dean F. Sittig, Kenneth P. Guappone, Richard H. Dykstra, Joshua Richardson, Adam Wright, James Carpenter, Carmit McMullen, Michael Shapiro, Arwen Bunce, Blackford Middleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support (CDS) development and implementation and for knowledge management (KM) processes in ambulatory clinics and community hospitals using commercial or locally developed systems in the U.S. Methods. Guided by the Multiple Perspectives Framework, the authors conducted ethnographic field studies at two community hospitals and five ambulatory clinic organizations across the U.S. Using a Rapid Assessment Process, a multidisciplinary research team: gathered preliminary assessment data; conducted on-site interviews, observations, and field surveys; analyzed data using both template and grounded methods; and developed universal themes. A panel of experts produced recommended practices. Results: The team identified ten themes related to CDS and KM. These include: 1) workflow; 2) knowledge management; 3) data as a foundation for CDS; 4) user computer interaction; 5) measurement and metrics; 6) governance; 7) translation for collaboration; 8) the meaning of CDS; 9) roles of special, essential people; and 10) communication, training, and support. Experts developed recommendations about each theme. The original Multiple Perspectives framework was modified to make explicit a new theoretical construct, that of Translational Interaction. Conclusions: These ten themes represent areas that need attention if a clinic or community hospital plans to implement and successfully utilize CDS. In addition, they have implications for workforce education, research, and national-level policy development. The Translational Interaction construct could guide future applied informatics research endeavors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Clinical Decision Support Systems
Knowledge Management
Community Hospital
Research
Training Support
Informatics
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Workflow
Policy Making
Organizations
Interviews
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings : A qualitative study. / Ash, Joan; Sittig, Dean F.; Guappone, Kenneth P.; Dykstra, Richard H.; Richardson, Joshua; Wright, Adam; Carpenter, James; McMullen, Carmit; Shapiro, Michael; Bunce, Arwen; Middleton, Blackford.

In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 12, No. 1, 6, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ash, Joan ; Sittig, Dean F. ; Guappone, Kenneth P. ; Dykstra, Richard H. ; Richardson, Joshua ; Wright, Adam ; Carpenter, James ; McMullen, Carmit ; Shapiro, Michael ; Bunce, Arwen ; Middleton, Blackford. / Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings : A qualitative study. In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{452a952a4cd34ab98d5ed225eda0d87c,
title = "Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to identify recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support (CDS) development and implementation and for knowledge management (KM) processes in ambulatory clinics and community hospitals using commercial or locally developed systems in the U.S. Methods. Guided by the Multiple Perspectives Framework, the authors conducted ethnographic field studies at two community hospitals and five ambulatory clinic organizations across the U.S. Using a Rapid Assessment Process, a multidisciplinary research team: gathered preliminary assessment data; conducted on-site interviews, observations, and field surveys; analyzed data using both template and grounded methods; and developed universal themes. A panel of experts produced recommended practices. Results: The team identified ten themes related to CDS and KM. These include: 1) workflow; 2) knowledge management; 3) data as a foundation for CDS; 4) user computer interaction; 5) measurement and metrics; 6) governance; 7) translation for collaboration; 8) the meaning of CDS; 9) roles of special, essential people; and 10) communication, training, and support. Experts developed recommendations about each theme. The original Multiple Perspectives framework was modified to make explicit a new theoretical construct, that of Translational Interaction. Conclusions: These ten themes represent areas that need attention if a clinic or community hospital plans to implement and successfully utilize CDS. In addition, they have implications for workforce education, research, and national-level policy development. The Translational Interaction construct could guide future applied informatics research endeavors.",
author = "Joan Ash and Sittig, {Dean F.} and Guappone, {Kenneth P.} and Dykstra, {Richard H.} and Joshua Richardson and Adam Wright and James Carpenter and Carmit McMullen and Michael Shapiro and Arwen Bunce and Blackford Middleton",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6947-12-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making",
issn = "1472-6947",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Ash, Joan

AU - Sittig, Dean F.

AU - Guappone, Kenneth P.

AU - Dykstra, Richard H.

AU - Richardson, Joshua

AU - Wright, Adam

AU - Carpenter, James

AU - McMullen, Carmit

AU - Shapiro, Michael

AU - Bunce, Arwen

AU - Middleton, Blackford

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to identify recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support (CDS) development and implementation and for knowledge management (KM) processes in ambulatory clinics and community hospitals using commercial or locally developed systems in the U.S. Methods. Guided by the Multiple Perspectives Framework, the authors conducted ethnographic field studies at two community hospitals and five ambulatory clinic organizations across the U.S. Using a Rapid Assessment Process, a multidisciplinary research team: gathered preliminary assessment data; conducted on-site interviews, observations, and field surveys; analyzed data using both template and grounded methods; and developed universal themes. A panel of experts produced recommended practices. Results: The team identified ten themes related to CDS and KM. These include: 1) workflow; 2) knowledge management; 3) data as a foundation for CDS; 4) user computer interaction; 5) measurement and metrics; 6) governance; 7) translation for collaboration; 8) the meaning of CDS; 9) roles of special, essential people; and 10) communication, training, and support. Experts developed recommendations about each theme. The original Multiple Perspectives framework was modified to make explicit a new theoretical construct, that of Translational Interaction. Conclusions: These ten themes represent areas that need attention if a clinic or community hospital plans to implement and successfully utilize CDS. In addition, they have implications for workforce education, research, and national-level policy development. The Translational Interaction construct could guide future applied informatics research endeavors.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to identify recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support (CDS) development and implementation and for knowledge management (KM) processes in ambulatory clinics and community hospitals using commercial or locally developed systems in the U.S. Methods. Guided by the Multiple Perspectives Framework, the authors conducted ethnographic field studies at two community hospitals and five ambulatory clinic organizations across the U.S. Using a Rapid Assessment Process, a multidisciplinary research team: gathered preliminary assessment data; conducted on-site interviews, observations, and field surveys; analyzed data using both template and grounded methods; and developed universal themes. A panel of experts produced recommended practices. Results: The team identified ten themes related to CDS and KM. These include: 1) workflow; 2) knowledge management; 3) data as a foundation for CDS; 4) user computer interaction; 5) measurement and metrics; 6) governance; 7) translation for collaboration; 8) the meaning of CDS; 9) roles of special, essential people; and 10) communication, training, and support. Experts developed recommendations about each theme. The original Multiple Perspectives framework was modified to make explicit a new theoretical construct, that of Translational Interaction. Conclusions: These ten themes represent areas that need attention if a clinic or community hospital plans to implement and successfully utilize CDS. In addition, they have implications for workforce education, research, and national-level policy development. The Translational Interaction construct could guide future applied informatics research endeavors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857014352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857014352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6947-12-6

DO - 10.1186/1472-6947-12-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 22333210

AN - SCOPUS:84857014352

VL - 12

JO - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

JF - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

SN - 1472-6947

IS - 1

M1 - 6

ER -