Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements

David Sahn, A. DeMaria, J. Kisslo, A. Weyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6851 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

400 M-mode echocardiographic surveys were distributed to determine interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. This was done with a view toward examining the need and determining the criteria for standardization of measurement. Each survey consisted of 5 M-mode echocardiograms with a calibration marker, measured by the survey participants anonymously. The echoes were judged of adequate quality for measurement of structures. 76 of the 400 (19%) were returned, allowing comparison of interobserver variability as well as examination of the measurement criteria which were used. Mean measurements and percent uncertainty were derived for each structure for each criterion of measurement. For example, for the aorta, 33% of examiners measured the aorta as an outer/inner or leading edge dimension, and 20% measured it as an outer/outer dimension. The percent uncertainty for the measurement (1.97 SD divided by the mean) showed a mean of 13.8% for the 25 packets of 5 echoes measured using the former criteria and 24.2% using the latter criteria. For ventricular chamber and cavity measurements, almost one-half of the examiners used the peak of the QRS and one-half of the examiners used the onset of the QRS for determining end-diastole. Estimates of the percent of measurement uncertainty for the septum, posterior wall and left ventricular cavity dimension in this study were 10-25%. They were much higher (40-70%) for the right ventricular cavity and right ventricular anterior wall. The survey shows significant interobserver and interlaboratory variation in measurement when examining the same echoes and indicates a need for ongoing education, quality control and standardization of measurement criteria. Recommendations for new criteria for measurement of M-mode echocardiograms are offered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1072-1083
Number of pages12
JournalCirculation
Volume58
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1978
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Echocardiography
Uncertainty
Aorta
Diastole
Quality Control
Calibration
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography : Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. / Sahn, David; DeMaria, A.; Kisslo, J.; Weyman, A.

In: Circulation, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1978, p. 1072-1083.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sahn, David ; DeMaria, A. ; Kisslo, J. ; Weyman, A. / Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography : Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. In: Circulation. 1978 ; Vol. 58, No. 6. pp. 1072-1083.
@article{2e953a31ad024798aa246d54114ee4f2,
title = "Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements",
abstract = "400 M-mode echocardiographic surveys were distributed to determine interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. This was done with a view toward examining the need and determining the criteria for standardization of measurement. Each survey consisted of 5 M-mode echocardiograms with a calibration marker, measured by the survey participants anonymously. The echoes were judged of adequate quality for measurement of structures. 76 of the 400 (19{\%}) were returned, allowing comparison of interobserver variability as well as examination of the measurement criteria which were used. Mean measurements and percent uncertainty were derived for each structure for each criterion of measurement. For example, for the aorta, 33{\%} of examiners measured the aorta as an outer/inner or leading edge dimension, and 20{\%} measured it as an outer/outer dimension. The percent uncertainty for the measurement (1.97 SD divided by the mean) showed a mean of 13.8{\%} for the 25 packets of 5 echoes measured using the former criteria and 24.2{\%} using the latter criteria. For ventricular chamber and cavity measurements, almost one-half of the examiners used the peak of the QRS and one-half of the examiners used the onset of the QRS for determining end-diastole. Estimates of the percent of measurement uncertainty for the septum, posterior wall and left ventricular cavity dimension in this study were 10-25{\%}. They were much higher (40-70{\%}) for the right ventricular cavity and right ventricular anterior wall. The survey shows significant interobserver and interlaboratory variation in measurement when examining the same echoes and indicates a need for ongoing education, quality control and standardization of measurement criteria. Recommendations for new criteria for measurement of M-mode echocardiograms are offered.",
author = "David Sahn and A. DeMaria and J. Kisslo and A. Weyman",
year = "1978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1072--1083",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography

T2 - Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements

AU - Sahn, David

AU - DeMaria, A.

AU - Kisslo, J.

AU - Weyman, A.

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - 400 M-mode echocardiographic surveys were distributed to determine interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. This was done with a view toward examining the need and determining the criteria for standardization of measurement. Each survey consisted of 5 M-mode echocardiograms with a calibration marker, measured by the survey participants anonymously. The echoes were judged of adequate quality for measurement of structures. 76 of the 400 (19%) were returned, allowing comparison of interobserver variability as well as examination of the measurement criteria which were used. Mean measurements and percent uncertainty were derived for each structure for each criterion of measurement. For example, for the aorta, 33% of examiners measured the aorta as an outer/inner or leading edge dimension, and 20% measured it as an outer/outer dimension. The percent uncertainty for the measurement (1.97 SD divided by the mean) showed a mean of 13.8% for the 25 packets of 5 echoes measured using the former criteria and 24.2% using the latter criteria. For ventricular chamber and cavity measurements, almost one-half of the examiners used the peak of the QRS and one-half of the examiners used the onset of the QRS for determining end-diastole. Estimates of the percent of measurement uncertainty for the septum, posterior wall and left ventricular cavity dimension in this study were 10-25%. They were much higher (40-70%) for the right ventricular cavity and right ventricular anterior wall. The survey shows significant interobserver and interlaboratory variation in measurement when examining the same echoes and indicates a need for ongoing education, quality control and standardization of measurement criteria. Recommendations for new criteria for measurement of M-mode echocardiograms are offered.

AB - 400 M-mode echocardiographic surveys were distributed to determine interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. This was done with a view toward examining the need and determining the criteria for standardization of measurement. Each survey consisted of 5 M-mode echocardiograms with a calibration marker, measured by the survey participants anonymously. The echoes were judged of adequate quality for measurement of structures. 76 of the 400 (19%) were returned, allowing comparison of interobserver variability as well as examination of the measurement criteria which were used. Mean measurements and percent uncertainty were derived for each structure for each criterion of measurement. For example, for the aorta, 33% of examiners measured the aorta as an outer/inner or leading edge dimension, and 20% measured it as an outer/outer dimension. The percent uncertainty for the measurement (1.97 SD divided by the mean) showed a mean of 13.8% for the 25 packets of 5 echoes measured using the former criteria and 24.2% using the latter criteria. For ventricular chamber and cavity measurements, almost one-half of the examiners used the peak of the QRS and one-half of the examiners used the onset of the QRS for determining end-diastole. Estimates of the percent of measurement uncertainty for the septum, posterior wall and left ventricular cavity dimension in this study were 10-25%. They were much higher (40-70%) for the right ventricular cavity and right ventricular anterior wall. The survey shows significant interobserver and interlaboratory variation in measurement when examining the same echoes and indicates a need for ongoing education, quality control and standardization of measurement criteria. Recommendations for new criteria for measurement of M-mode echocardiograms are offered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018231715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018231715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 709763

AN - SCOPUS:0018231715

VL - 58

SP - 1072

EP - 1083

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 6

ER -