Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage

Rachel Gold, Jennifer Devoe, Patti J. McIntire, Jon E. Puro, Susan L. Chauvie, Amit R. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients receive care in safety net clinics regardless of insurance status; however, receipt of diabetes preventive care might vary among patients with differing levels of insurance continuity. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from adults with diabetes who were receiving care in 50 safety net clinics in Oregon in 2005 to 2007, we conducted adjusted logistic regressions to model the associations between amount of time with insurance and rates of receipt of lipid screening, influenza vaccination, nephropathy screening (urine microalbumin), and HbA1c (glycohemoglobin) screening. Results: Of 3384 adults with diabetes, 711 were partially insured (covered 1% to 99% of the 3-year study period), 909 had no coverage, and 1764 were continuously insured. In adjusted models, persons with partial or no coverage during the 3-year study period were less likely to receive most preventive services compared with those with continuous coverage. We found no evidence of a dose-response relationship with increasing duration of coverage, nor of a threshold amount of partial coverage, associated with better receipt of care. Conclusions: Safety net clinic patients need both access to primary care and continuous insurance. All patients with partial coverage, regardless of the extent of time with insurance, had lower odds of receiving preventive care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-49
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Preventive Medicine
Insurance Coverage
Safety-net Providers
Patient Safety
Insurance
Electronic Health Records
Human Influenza
Primary Health Care
Patient Care
Vaccination
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Urine
Lipids

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Electronic medical records
  • Health insurance
  • Health policy
  • Medically uninsured

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage. / Gold, Rachel; Devoe, Jennifer; McIntire, Patti J.; Puro, Jon E.; Chauvie, Susan L.; Shah, Amit R.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 42-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gold, Rachel ; Devoe, Jennifer ; McIntire, Patti J. ; Puro, Jon E. ; Chauvie, Susan L. ; Shah, Amit R. / Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 42-49.
@article{9d35345b21624a50b1db96e4413ded37,
title = "Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage",
abstract = "Background: Patients receive care in safety net clinics regardless of insurance status; however, receipt of diabetes preventive care might vary among patients with differing levels of insurance continuity. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from adults with diabetes who were receiving care in 50 safety net clinics in Oregon in 2005 to 2007, we conducted adjusted logistic regressions to model the associations between amount of time with insurance and rates of receipt of lipid screening, influenza vaccination, nephropathy screening (urine microalbumin), and HbA1c (glycohemoglobin) screening. Results: Of 3384 adults with diabetes, 711 were partially insured (covered 1{\%} to 99{\%} of the 3-year study period), 909 had no coverage, and 1764 were continuously insured. In adjusted models, persons with partial or no coverage during the 3-year study period were less likely to receive most preventive services compared with those with continuous coverage. We found no evidence of a dose-response relationship with increasing duration of coverage, nor of a threshold amount of partial coverage, associated with better receipt of care. Conclusions: Safety net clinic patients need both access to primary care and continuous insurance. All patients with partial coverage, regardless of the extent of time with insurance, had lower odds of receiving preventive care.",
keywords = "Diabetes, Electronic medical records, Health insurance, Health policy, Medically uninsured",
author = "Rachel Gold and Jennifer Devoe and McIntire, {Patti J.} and Puro, {Jon E.} and Chauvie, {Susan L.} and Shah, {Amit R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "42--49",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage

AU - Gold, Rachel

AU - Devoe, Jennifer

AU - McIntire, Patti J.

AU - Puro, Jon E.

AU - Chauvie, Susan L.

AU - Shah, Amit R.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Background: Patients receive care in safety net clinics regardless of insurance status; however, receipt of diabetes preventive care might vary among patients with differing levels of insurance continuity. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from adults with diabetes who were receiving care in 50 safety net clinics in Oregon in 2005 to 2007, we conducted adjusted logistic regressions to model the associations between amount of time with insurance and rates of receipt of lipid screening, influenza vaccination, nephropathy screening (urine microalbumin), and HbA1c (glycohemoglobin) screening. Results: Of 3384 adults with diabetes, 711 were partially insured (covered 1% to 99% of the 3-year study period), 909 had no coverage, and 1764 were continuously insured. In adjusted models, persons with partial or no coverage during the 3-year study period were less likely to receive most preventive services compared with those with continuous coverage. We found no evidence of a dose-response relationship with increasing duration of coverage, nor of a threshold amount of partial coverage, associated with better receipt of care. Conclusions: Safety net clinic patients need both access to primary care and continuous insurance. All patients with partial coverage, regardless of the extent of time with insurance, had lower odds of receiving preventive care.

AB - Background: Patients receive care in safety net clinics regardless of insurance status; however, receipt of diabetes preventive care might vary among patients with differing levels of insurance continuity. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from adults with diabetes who were receiving care in 50 safety net clinics in Oregon in 2005 to 2007, we conducted adjusted logistic regressions to model the associations between amount of time with insurance and rates of receipt of lipid screening, influenza vaccination, nephropathy screening (urine microalbumin), and HbA1c (glycohemoglobin) screening. Results: Of 3384 adults with diabetes, 711 were partially insured (covered 1% to 99% of the 3-year study period), 909 had no coverage, and 1764 were continuously insured. In adjusted models, persons with partial or no coverage during the 3-year study period were less likely to receive most preventive services compared with those with continuous coverage. We found no evidence of a dose-response relationship with increasing duration of coverage, nor of a threshold amount of partial coverage, associated with better receipt of care. Conclusions: Safety net clinic patients need both access to primary care and continuous insurance. All patients with partial coverage, regardless of the extent of time with insurance, had lower odds of receiving preventive care.

KW - Diabetes

KW - Electronic medical records

KW - Health insurance

KW - Health policy

KW - Medically uninsured

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855715739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855715739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110142

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110142

M3 - Article

C2 - 22218623

AN - SCOPUS:84855715739

VL - 25

SP - 42

EP - 49

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 1

ER -