Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration

Sun Young Kim, Jack Ferracane, Hae Young Kim, In Bog Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined changes in the dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during restorative procedures and compared permeability after restoration among restorative materials and adhesives. Methods: A class 1 cavity was prepared and restored with either amalgam (Bestaloy), or composite (Z-250) with one of two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Scotchbond MultiPurpose: MP and Single Bond 2: SB) or one of two self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond: CE and Easy Bond: EB) on an extracted human third molar which was connected to a sub-nanoliter fluid flow measuring device (NFMD) under 20 cm water pressure. DFF was measured from the intact tooth state through the restoration procedures to 30 min after restoration, and re-measured at 3 and 7 days post-restoration. Results: Inward flow during cavity preparation was followed by outward flow after preparation. In amalgam restoration, the outward flow changed into an inward flow during amalgam filling, which was followed by a slight outward flow after finishing. In composite restoration, MP and SB showed an inward flow and outward flow for the rinsing and drying steps, respectively. Application of a hydrophobic bonding resin in the MP and CE systems caused a decrease in the flow rate. Air-drying of solvent for the CE and EB systems caused a sudden outward flow, whereas light-curing of the adhesive and composite caused an abrupt inward flow. Conclusions: Each restorative step clearly changed the direction and the rate of the DFF during restoration, which could be well identified with NFMD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-351
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Dentinal Fluid
Adhesives
Equipment and Supplies
Third Molar
Permeability
Tooth
Air
Light
Pressure
Water

Keywords

  • Amalgam
  • Composite
  • Dentinal fluid flow
  • Etch-and-rinse
  • Permeability
  • Self-etch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration. / Kim, Sun Young; Ferracane, Jack; Kim, Hae Young; Lee, In Bog.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 38, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 343-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Sun Young ; Ferracane, Jack ; Kim, Hae Young ; Lee, In Bog. / Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 343-351.
@article{34acb6e1e2de4a338106b4632f61427c,
title = "Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration",
abstract = "Objectives: This study examined changes in the dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during restorative procedures and compared permeability after restoration among restorative materials and adhesives. Methods: A class 1 cavity was prepared and restored with either amalgam (Bestaloy), or composite (Z-250) with one of two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Scotchbond MultiPurpose: MP and Single Bond 2: SB) or one of two self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond: CE and Easy Bond: EB) on an extracted human third molar which was connected to a sub-nanoliter fluid flow measuring device (NFMD) under 20 cm water pressure. DFF was measured from the intact tooth state through the restoration procedures to 30 min after restoration, and re-measured at 3 and 7 days post-restoration. Results: Inward flow during cavity preparation was followed by outward flow after preparation. In amalgam restoration, the outward flow changed into an inward flow during amalgam filling, which was followed by a slight outward flow after finishing. In composite restoration, MP and SB showed an inward flow and outward flow for the rinsing and drying steps, respectively. Application of a hydrophobic bonding resin in the MP and CE systems caused a decrease in the flow rate. Air-drying of solvent for the CE and EB systems caused a sudden outward flow, whereas light-curing of the adhesive and composite caused an abrupt inward flow. Conclusions: Each restorative step clearly changed the direction and the rate of the DFF during restoration, which could be well identified with NFMD.",
keywords = "Amalgam, Composite, Dentinal fluid flow, Etch-and-rinse, Permeability, Self-etch",
author = "Kim, {Sun Young} and Jack Ferracane and Kim, {Hae Young} and Lee, {In Bog}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "343--351",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration

AU - Kim, Sun Young

AU - Ferracane, Jack

AU - Kim, Hae Young

AU - Lee, In Bog

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Objectives: This study examined changes in the dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during restorative procedures and compared permeability after restoration among restorative materials and adhesives. Methods: A class 1 cavity was prepared and restored with either amalgam (Bestaloy), or composite (Z-250) with one of two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Scotchbond MultiPurpose: MP and Single Bond 2: SB) or one of two self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond: CE and Easy Bond: EB) on an extracted human third molar which was connected to a sub-nanoliter fluid flow measuring device (NFMD) under 20 cm water pressure. DFF was measured from the intact tooth state through the restoration procedures to 30 min after restoration, and re-measured at 3 and 7 days post-restoration. Results: Inward flow during cavity preparation was followed by outward flow after preparation. In amalgam restoration, the outward flow changed into an inward flow during amalgam filling, which was followed by a slight outward flow after finishing. In composite restoration, MP and SB showed an inward flow and outward flow for the rinsing and drying steps, respectively. Application of a hydrophobic bonding resin in the MP and CE systems caused a decrease in the flow rate. Air-drying of solvent for the CE and EB systems caused a sudden outward flow, whereas light-curing of the adhesive and composite caused an abrupt inward flow. Conclusions: Each restorative step clearly changed the direction and the rate of the DFF during restoration, which could be well identified with NFMD.

AB - Objectives: This study examined changes in the dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during restorative procedures and compared permeability after restoration among restorative materials and adhesives. Methods: A class 1 cavity was prepared and restored with either amalgam (Bestaloy), or composite (Z-250) with one of two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Scotchbond MultiPurpose: MP and Single Bond 2: SB) or one of two self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond: CE and Easy Bond: EB) on an extracted human third molar which was connected to a sub-nanoliter fluid flow measuring device (NFMD) under 20 cm water pressure. DFF was measured from the intact tooth state through the restoration procedures to 30 min after restoration, and re-measured at 3 and 7 days post-restoration. Results: Inward flow during cavity preparation was followed by outward flow after preparation. In amalgam restoration, the outward flow changed into an inward flow during amalgam filling, which was followed by a slight outward flow after finishing. In composite restoration, MP and SB showed an inward flow and outward flow for the rinsing and drying steps, respectively. Application of a hydrophobic bonding resin in the MP and CE systems caused a decrease in the flow rate. Air-drying of solvent for the CE and EB systems caused a sudden outward flow, whereas light-curing of the adhesive and composite caused an abrupt inward flow. Conclusions: Each restorative step clearly changed the direction and the rate of the DFF during restoration, which could be well identified with NFMD.

KW - Amalgam

KW - Composite

KW - Dentinal fluid flow

KW - Etch-and-rinse

KW - Permeability

KW - Self-etch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649178584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649178584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 343

EP - 351

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 4

ER -