Rational ordering of serum electrolytes: Development of clinical criteria

Robert (Bob) Lowe, Alan B. Wood, Richard E. Burney, James R. Mackenzie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of electrolyte abnormalities in emergency department patients, to assess the proportion of these abnormalities affecting patient outcome, and to develop a set of clinical criteria to allow selective ordering of serum electrolytes. The ordering physicians completed questionnaires describing the clinical presentations of 1,031 patients on whom electrolytes were requested. For every patient with abnormal electrolyte values, the chart was reviewed to ascertain whether this was a clinically significant electrolyte abnormality (CSEA). The clinicians' responses to the questionnaires were used to construct a clinical criteria set predictive of CSEAs. Five hundred forty-five patients (52.9%) had one or more abnormal electrolytes, but only 161 patients (15.6%) had CSEAs. A set of ten clinical criteria detected 159 of 161 CSEAs (98.8% sensitivity) and would have avoided the ordering of electrolytes in 262 cases (29.9% specificity). At a cost to the patient of $20 per set of electrolytes ordered, detection of 159 CSEAs using the clinical criteria would cost $96.73 per CSEA detected. Detection of the additional two CSEAs by ordering electrolytes on all patients in the series would cost an additional $5,240. If the accuracy of these clinical criteria is confirmed in other settings, they may be useful guidelines for reducing laboratory charges without compromising patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-269
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrolytes
Serum
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Emergency Service
Patient Care
Guidelines
Physicians

Keywords

  • criteria for ordering
  • serum electrolytes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Rational ordering of serum electrolytes : Development of clinical criteria. / Lowe, Robert (Bob); Wood, Alan B.; Burney, Richard E.; Mackenzie, James R.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1987, p. 260-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lowe, Robert (Bob) ; Wood, Alan B. ; Burney, Richard E. ; Mackenzie, James R. / Rational ordering of serum electrolytes : Development of clinical criteria. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1987 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 260-269.
@article{9b129386d802430e9ab10273325dae44,
title = "Rational ordering of serum electrolytes: Development of clinical criteria",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of electrolyte abnormalities in emergency department patients, to assess the proportion of these abnormalities affecting patient outcome, and to develop a set of clinical criteria to allow selective ordering of serum electrolytes. The ordering physicians completed questionnaires describing the clinical presentations of 1,031 patients on whom electrolytes were requested. For every patient with abnormal electrolyte values, the chart was reviewed to ascertain whether this was a clinically significant electrolyte abnormality (CSEA). The clinicians' responses to the questionnaires were used to construct a clinical criteria set predictive of CSEAs. Five hundred forty-five patients (52.9{\%}) had one or more abnormal electrolytes, but only 161 patients (15.6{\%}) had CSEAs. A set of ten clinical criteria detected 159 of 161 CSEAs (98.8{\%} sensitivity) and would have avoided the ordering of electrolytes in 262 cases (29.9{\%} specificity). At a cost to the patient of $20 per set of electrolytes ordered, detection of 159 CSEAs using the clinical criteria would cost $96.73 per CSEA detected. Detection of the additional two CSEAs by ordering electrolytes on all patients in the series would cost an additional $5,240. If the accuracy of these clinical criteria is confirmed in other settings, they may be useful guidelines for reducing laboratory charges without compromising patient care.",
keywords = "criteria for ordering, serum electrolytes",
author = "Lowe, {Robert (Bob)} and Wood, {Alan B.} and Burney, {Richard E.} and Mackenzie, {James R.}",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80170-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "260--269",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rational ordering of serum electrolytes

T2 - Development of clinical criteria

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

AU - Wood, Alan B.

AU - Burney, Richard E.

AU - Mackenzie, James R.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of electrolyte abnormalities in emergency department patients, to assess the proportion of these abnormalities affecting patient outcome, and to develop a set of clinical criteria to allow selective ordering of serum electrolytes. The ordering physicians completed questionnaires describing the clinical presentations of 1,031 patients on whom electrolytes were requested. For every patient with abnormal electrolyte values, the chart was reviewed to ascertain whether this was a clinically significant electrolyte abnormality (CSEA). The clinicians' responses to the questionnaires were used to construct a clinical criteria set predictive of CSEAs. Five hundred forty-five patients (52.9%) had one or more abnormal electrolytes, but only 161 patients (15.6%) had CSEAs. A set of ten clinical criteria detected 159 of 161 CSEAs (98.8% sensitivity) and would have avoided the ordering of electrolytes in 262 cases (29.9% specificity). At a cost to the patient of $20 per set of electrolytes ordered, detection of 159 CSEAs using the clinical criteria would cost $96.73 per CSEA detected. Detection of the additional two CSEAs by ordering electrolytes on all patients in the series would cost an additional $5,240. If the accuracy of these clinical criteria is confirmed in other settings, they may be useful guidelines for reducing laboratory charges without compromising patient care.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of electrolyte abnormalities in emergency department patients, to assess the proportion of these abnormalities affecting patient outcome, and to develop a set of clinical criteria to allow selective ordering of serum electrolytes. The ordering physicians completed questionnaires describing the clinical presentations of 1,031 patients on whom electrolytes were requested. For every patient with abnormal electrolyte values, the chart was reviewed to ascertain whether this was a clinically significant electrolyte abnormality (CSEA). The clinicians' responses to the questionnaires were used to construct a clinical criteria set predictive of CSEAs. Five hundred forty-five patients (52.9%) had one or more abnormal electrolytes, but only 161 patients (15.6%) had CSEAs. A set of ten clinical criteria detected 159 of 161 CSEAs (98.8% sensitivity) and would have avoided the ordering of electrolytes in 262 cases (29.9% specificity). At a cost to the patient of $20 per set of electrolytes ordered, detection of 159 CSEAs using the clinical criteria would cost $96.73 per CSEA detected. Detection of the additional two CSEAs by ordering electrolytes on all patients in the series would cost an additional $5,240. If the accuracy of these clinical criteria is confirmed in other settings, they may be useful guidelines for reducing laboratory charges without compromising patient care.

KW - criteria for ordering

KW - serum electrolytes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023145061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023145061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80170-1

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80170-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 3101557

AN - SCOPUS:0023145061

VL - 16

SP - 260

EP - 269

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 3

ER -