Rapid Web-Based Platform for Assessment of Orthopedic Surgery Patient Care Milestones: A 2-Year Validation

Kenneth Gundle, Dayne T. Mickelson, Arien Cherones, Jason Black, Doug P. Hanel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To determine the validity, feasibility, and responsiveness of a new web-based platform for rapid milestone-based evaluations of orthopedic surgery residents. Setting Single academic medical center, including a trauma center and pediatrics tertiary hospital. Participants Forty residents (PG1-5) in an orthopedic residency program and their faculty evaluators. Methods Residents and faculty were trained and supported in the use of a novel trainee-initiated web-based evaluation system. Residents were encouraged to use the system to track progress on patient care subcompetencies. Two years of prospectively collected data were reviewed from residents at an academic program. The primary outcome was Spearman's rank correlation between postgraduate year (PGY) and competency level achieved as a measure of validity. Secondary outcomes assessed feasibility, resident self-evaluation versus faculty evaluation, the distributions among subcompetencies, and responsiveness over time. Results Between February 2014 and February 2016, 856 orthopedic surgery patient care subcompetency evaluations were completed (1.2 evaluations per day). Residents promptly requested feedback after a procedure (median = 0 days, interquartile range: 0-2), and faculty responded within 2 days in 51% (median = 2 days, interquartile range: 0-13). Primary outcome showed a correlation between PGY and competency level (r = 0.78, p < 0.001), with significant differences in competency among PGYs (p < 0.001 by Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test). Self-evaluations by residents substantially agreed with faculty-assigned competency level (weighted Cohen's κ = 0.72, p < 0.001). Resident classes beginning the study as PGY1, 2, and 3 separately demonstrated gains in competency over time (Spearman's rank correlation 0.39, 0.60, 0.59, respectively, each p < 0.001). There was significant variance in the number of evaluations submitted per subcompetency (median = 43, range: 6-113) and competency level assigned (p < 0.01). Conclusions Rapid tracking of trainee competency with milestone-based evaluations in a learner-centered mobile platform demonstrated validity, feasibility, and responsiveness. Next Accreditation System-mandated data may be efficiently collected and used for trainee and program self-study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1116-1123
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume74
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Keywords

  • competency
  • feedback
  • next accreditation system
  • Patient Care
  • Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
  • validation
  • web-based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rapid Web-Based Platform for Assessment of Orthopedic Surgery Patient Care Milestones: A 2-Year Validation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this