Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy

Evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial

Sunil A. Sheth, Reza Jahan, Elad I. Levy, Tudor G. Jovin, Blaise Baxter, Raul G. Nogueira, Wayne Clark, Ronald Budzik, Osama O. Zaidat, Jeffrey L. Saver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background In light of recent positive trial data for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), stent retriever use by practitioners without prior experience with these devices may become more common. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for AIS using Solitaire for patients treated in the roll-in period of the Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial, which represented the first clinical use of the device for these interventionalists. Methods Prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and angiographic data on patients treated in the initial roll-in and subsequent randomized phases of the SWIFT study were collected and analyzed. Key statistical analyses were validated by an independent external statistician. Results Patients in the roll-in period achieved equivalently high rates of reperfusion (55%) compared with those treated with the device in the randomized phase (61%). Rates of adverse events were comparable (13% vs 9%). Rates of good neurological outcome were equivalent between the roll-in and randomized patients treated with Solitaire (63% vs 58%). Including the roll-in patients strengthened the conclusions of the study, that reperfusion rates without symptomatic hemorrhage with Solitaire were greater than with Merci (59% vs 24%, p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-352
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Thrombectomy
Learning Curve
Stents
Equipment and Supplies
Reperfusion
Stroke
Therapeutics
Demography
Hemorrhage
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy : Evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial. / Sheth, Sunil A.; Jahan, Reza; Levy, Elad I.; Jovin, Tudor G.; Baxter, Blaise; Nogueira, Raul G.; Clark, Wayne; Budzik, Ronald; Zaidat, Osama O.; Saver, Jeffrey L.

In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 347-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheth, Sunil A. ; Jahan, Reza ; Levy, Elad I. ; Jovin, Tudor G. ; Baxter, Blaise ; Nogueira, Raul G. ; Clark, Wayne ; Budzik, Ronald ; Zaidat, Osama O. ; Saver, Jeffrey L. / Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy : Evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial. In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 347-352.
@article{4276640b630d416bbc19982e67e04391,
title = "Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy: Evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial",
abstract = "Background In light of recent positive trial data for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), stent retriever use by practitioners without prior experience with these devices may become more common. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for AIS using Solitaire for patients treated in the roll-in period of the Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial, which represented the first clinical use of the device for these interventionalists. Methods Prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and angiographic data on patients treated in the initial roll-in and subsequent randomized phases of the SWIFT study were collected and analyzed. Key statistical analyses were validated by an independent external statistician. Results Patients in the roll-in period achieved equivalently high rates of reperfusion (55{\%}) compared with those treated with the device in the randomized phase (61{\%}). Rates of adverse events were comparable (13{\%} vs 9{\%}). Rates of good neurological outcome were equivalent between the roll-in and randomized patients treated with Solitaire (63{\%} vs 58{\%}). Including the roll-in patients strengthened the conclusions of the study, that reperfusion rates without symptomatic hemorrhage with Solitaire were greater than with Merci (59{\%} vs 24{\%}, p",
author = "Sheth, {Sunil A.} and Reza Jahan and Levy, {Elad I.} and Jovin, {Tudor G.} and Blaise Baxter and Nogueira, {Raul G.} and Wayne Clark and Ronald Budzik and Zaidat, {Osama O.} and Saver, {Jeffrey L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011627",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "347--352",
journal = "Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery",
issn = "1759-8478",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy

T2 - Evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial

AU - Sheth, Sunil A.

AU - Jahan, Reza

AU - Levy, Elad I.

AU - Jovin, Tudor G.

AU - Baxter, Blaise

AU - Nogueira, Raul G.

AU - Clark, Wayne

AU - Budzik, Ronald

AU - Zaidat, Osama O.

AU - Saver, Jeffrey L.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background In light of recent positive trial data for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), stent retriever use by practitioners without prior experience with these devices may become more common. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for AIS using Solitaire for patients treated in the roll-in period of the Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial, which represented the first clinical use of the device for these interventionalists. Methods Prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and angiographic data on patients treated in the initial roll-in and subsequent randomized phases of the SWIFT study were collected and analyzed. Key statistical analyses were validated by an independent external statistician. Results Patients in the roll-in period achieved equivalently high rates of reperfusion (55%) compared with those treated with the device in the randomized phase (61%). Rates of adverse events were comparable (13% vs 9%). Rates of good neurological outcome were equivalent between the roll-in and randomized patients treated with Solitaire (63% vs 58%). Including the roll-in patients strengthened the conclusions of the study, that reperfusion rates without symptomatic hemorrhage with Solitaire were greater than with Merci (59% vs 24%, p

AB - Background In light of recent positive trial data for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), stent retriever use by practitioners without prior experience with these devices may become more common. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for AIS using Solitaire for patients treated in the roll-in period of the Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT) trial, which represented the first clinical use of the device for these interventionalists. Methods Prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and angiographic data on patients treated in the initial roll-in and subsequent randomized phases of the SWIFT study were collected and analyzed. Key statistical analyses were validated by an independent external statistician. Results Patients in the roll-in period achieved equivalently high rates of reperfusion (55%) compared with those treated with the device in the randomized phase (61%). Rates of adverse events were comparable (13% vs 9%). Rates of good neurological outcome were equivalent between the roll-in and randomized patients treated with Solitaire (63% vs 58%). Including the roll-in patients strengthened the conclusions of the study, that reperfusion rates without symptomatic hemorrhage with Solitaire were greater than with Merci (59% vs 24%, p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962568402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962568402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011627

DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011627

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 347

EP - 352

JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

SN - 1759-8478

IS - 4

ER -