Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation RASTA study

Sanjay Dixit, Francis E. Marchlinski, David Lin, David J. Callans, Rupa Bala, Michael P. Riley, Fermin C. Garcia, Mathew D. Hutchinson, Sarah J. Ratcliffe, Joshua M. Cooper, Ralph J. Verdino, Vickas V. Patel, Erica S. Zado, Nancy R. Cash, Tony Killian, Todd T. Tomson, Edward P. Gerstenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients. We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF. Methods and Results-Subjects were randomized as follows: arm 1, PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol (standard approach); arm 2, standard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites (mitral annulus, fossa ovalis, eustachian ridge, crista terminalis, and superior vena cava); or arm 3, standard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites. Patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months. The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure. A total of 156 patients (aged 59±9 years; 136 males; AF duration, 47±50 months) participated (arm 1, 55 patients; arm 2, 50 patients; arm 3, 51 patients). Procedural outcomes (procedure, fluoroscopy, and PVI times) were comparable between the 3 arms. More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram (33±9 versus 22±9; P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-294
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Pulmonary Veins
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Therapeutics
Superior Vena Cava
Fluoroscopy
Cardiac Arrhythmias

Keywords

  • Ablation
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Catheter ablation
  • Clinical trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation RASTA study. / Dixit, Sanjay; Marchlinski, Francis E.; Lin, David; Callans, David J.; Bala, Rupa; Riley, Michael P.; Garcia, Fermin C.; Hutchinson, Mathew D.; Ratcliffe, Sarah J.; Cooper, Joshua M.; Verdino, Ralph J.; Patel, Vickas V.; Zado, Erica S.; Cash, Nancy R.; Killian, Tony; Tomson, Todd T.; Gerstenfeld, Edward P.

In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 287-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dixit, S, Marchlinski, FE, Lin, D, Callans, DJ, Bala, R, Riley, MP, Garcia, FC, Hutchinson, MD, Ratcliffe, SJ, Cooper, JM, Verdino, RJ, Patel, VV, Zado, ES, Cash, NR, Killian, T, Tomson, TT & Gerstenfeld, EP 2012, 'Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation RASTA study', Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.966226
Dixit, Sanjay ; Marchlinski, Francis E. ; Lin, David ; Callans, David J. ; Bala, Rupa ; Riley, Michael P. ; Garcia, Fermin C. ; Hutchinson, Mathew D. ; Ratcliffe, Sarah J. ; Cooper, Joshua M. ; Verdino, Ralph J. ; Patel, Vickas V. ; Zado, Erica S. ; Cash, Nancy R. ; Killian, Tony ; Tomson, Todd T. ; Gerstenfeld, Edward P. / Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation RASTA study. In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 287-294.
@article{efb6d87943df4243b679fdcd6b4424d8,
title = "Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation RASTA study",
abstract = "Background-The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients. We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF. Methods and Results-Subjects were randomized as follows: arm 1, PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol (standard approach); arm 2, standard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites (mitral annulus, fossa ovalis, eustachian ridge, crista terminalis, and superior vena cava); or arm 3, standard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites. Patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months. The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure. A total of 156 patients (aged 59±9 years; 136 males; AF duration, 47±50 months) participated (arm 1, 55 patients; arm 2, 50 patients; arm 3, 51 patients). Procedural outcomes (procedure, fluoroscopy, and PVI times) were comparable between the 3 arms. More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram (33±9 versus 22±9; P",
keywords = "Ablation, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Clinical trials",
author = "Sanjay Dixit and Marchlinski, {Francis E.} and David Lin and Callans, {David J.} and Rupa Bala and Riley, {Michael P.} and Garcia, {Fermin C.} and Hutchinson, {Mathew D.} and Ratcliffe, {Sarah J.} and Cooper, {Joshua M.} and Verdino, {Ralph J.} and Patel, {Vickas V.} and Zado, {Erica S.} and Cash, {Nancy R.} and Tony Killian and Tomson, {Todd T.} and Gerstenfeld, {Edward P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCEP.111.966226",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "287--294",
journal = "Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology",
issn = "1941-3149",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation RASTA study

AU - Dixit, Sanjay

AU - Marchlinski, Francis E.

AU - Lin, David

AU - Callans, David J.

AU - Bala, Rupa

AU - Riley, Michael P.

AU - Garcia, Fermin C.

AU - Hutchinson, Mathew D.

AU - Ratcliffe, Sarah J.

AU - Cooper, Joshua M.

AU - Verdino, Ralph J.

AU - Patel, Vickas V.

AU - Zado, Erica S.

AU - Cash, Nancy R.

AU - Killian, Tony

AU - Tomson, Todd T.

AU - Gerstenfeld, Edward P.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Background-The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients. We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF. Methods and Results-Subjects were randomized as follows: arm 1, PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol (standard approach); arm 2, standard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites (mitral annulus, fossa ovalis, eustachian ridge, crista terminalis, and superior vena cava); or arm 3, standard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites. Patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months. The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure. A total of 156 patients (aged 59±9 years; 136 males; AF duration, 47±50 months) participated (arm 1, 55 patients; arm 2, 50 patients; arm 3, 51 patients). Procedural outcomes (procedure, fluoroscopy, and PVI times) were comparable between the 3 arms. More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram (33±9 versus 22±9; P

AB - Background-The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients. We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF. Methods and Results-Subjects were randomized as follows: arm 1, PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol (standard approach); arm 2, standard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites (mitral annulus, fossa ovalis, eustachian ridge, crista terminalis, and superior vena cava); or arm 3, standard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites. Patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months. The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure. A total of 156 patients (aged 59±9 years; 136 males; AF duration, 47±50 months) participated (arm 1, 55 patients; arm 2, 50 patients; arm 3, 51 patients). Procedural outcomes (procedure, fluoroscopy, and PVI times) were comparable between the 3 arms. More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram (33±9 versus 22±9; P

KW - Ablation

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Catheter ablation

KW - Clinical trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862256367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862256367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.966226

DO - 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.966226

M3 - Article

C2 - 22139886

AN - SCOPUS:84862256367

VL - 5

SP - 287

EP - 294

JO - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

JF - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

SN - 1941-3149

IS - 2

ER -