Radiographic predictors of need for angiographic embolization after traumatic renal injury

Geoffrey R. Nuss, Allen F. Morey, Adam C. Jenkins, Jeffrey H. Pruitt, Daniel Dugi, Brian Morse, Shahrokh F. Shariat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although the American Association of the Surgery for Trauma Organ Injury Scale is the gold standard for staging renal trauma, it does not address characteristics of perirenal hematomas that may indicate significant hemorrhage. Angiographic embolization has become well established as an effective method for achieving hemostasis. We evaluated two novel radiographic indicators-perirenal hematoma size and intravascular contrast extravasation (ICE)-to test their association with subsequent angiographic embolization. Methods: Among 194 patients with renal trauma between 1999 and 2004, 52 having a grade 3 (n = 33) or grade 4 (n = 19) renal laceration were identified. Computed tomography scans were reviewed by a staff radiologist and urologist blinded to outcomes. ICE was defined as contrast within the perirenal hematoma during the portal venous phase having signal density matching contrast in the renal artery. Hematoma size was determined in four ways: hematoma area (HA), hematoma to kidney area ratio (HKR), difference between hematoma and kidney area (HKD), and perirenal hematoma rim distance (PRD). Results: Of the 52 patients, 8 had ICE and 4 of these (50%) required embolization, whereas none of the 42 (0%) patients without ICE needed embolization (p = 0.001). Likewise, all four measures of perirenal hematoma size assessed were significantly greater in patients receiving embolization [HA (128.3 vs. 75.4 cm2, p = 0.009), HKR (2.75 vs. 1.65, p = 0.008), HKD (76.5 vs. 30.2 cm2, p = 0.006), and PRD (4.0 vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.041)]. Conclusion: Perirenal hematoma size and ICE are readily detectible radiographic features and are associated with the need for angiographic embolization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)578-582
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hematoma
Kidney
Wounds and Injuries
Lacerations
Renal Artery
Hemostasis
Tomography
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • CT scan
  • Embolization
  • Renal
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Radiographic predictors of need for angiographic embolization after traumatic renal injury. / Nuss, Geoffrey R.; Morey, Allen F.; Jenkins, Adam C.; Pruitt, Jeffrey H.; Dugi, Daniel; Morse, Brian; Shariat, Shahrokh F.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 67, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 578-582.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nuss, Geoffrey R. ; Morey, Allen F. ; Jenkins, Adam C. ; Pruitt, Jeffrey H. ; Dugi, Daniel ; Morse, Brian ; Shariat, Shahrokh F. / Radiographic predictors of need for angiographic embolization after traumatic renal injury. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2009 ; Vol. 67, No. 3. pp. 578-582.
@article{cde2a5b1047e45348be75cbc4f0e536c,
title = "Radiographic predictors of need for angiographic embolization after traumatic renal injury",
abstract = "Background: Although the American Association of the Surgery for Trauma Organ Injury Scale is the gold standard for staging renal trauma, it does not address characteristics of perirenal hematomas that may indicate significant hemorrhage. Angiographic embolization has become well established as an effective method for achieving hemostasis. We evaluated two novel radiographic indicators-perirenal hematoma size and intravascular contrast extravasation (ICE)-to test their association with subsequent angiographic embolization. Methods: Among 194 patients with renal trauma between 1999 and 2004, 52 having a grade 3 (n = 33) or grade 4 (n = 19) renal laceration were identified. Computed tomography scans were reviewed by a staff radiologist and urologist blinded to outcomes. ICE was defined as contrast within the perirenal hematoma during the portal venous phase having signal density matching contrast in the renal artery. Hematoma size was determined in four ways: hematoma area (HA), hematoma to kidney area ratio (HKR), difference between hematoma and kidney area (HKD), and perirenal hematoma rim distance (PRD). Results: Of the 52 patients, 8 had ICE and 4 of these (50{\%}) required embolization, whereas none of the 42 (0{\%}) patients without ICE needed embolization (p = 0.001). Likewise, all four measures of perirenal hematoma size assessed were significantly greater in patients receiving embolization [HA (128.3 vs. 75.4 cm2, p = 0.009), HKR (2.75 vs. 1.65, p = 0.008), HKD (76.5 vs. 30.2 cm2, p = 0.006), and PRD (4.0 vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.041)]. Conclusion: Perirenal hematoma size and ICE are readily detectible radiographic features and are associated with the need for angiographic embolization.",
keywords = "CT scan, Embolization, Renal, Trauma",
author = "Nuss, {Geoffrey R.} and Morey, {Allen F.} and Jenkins, {Adam C.} and Pruitt, {Jeffrey H.} and Daniel Dugi and Brian Morse and Shariat, {Shahrokh F.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181af6ef4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "578--582",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiographic predictors of need for angiographic embolization after traumatic renal injury

AU - Nuss, Geoffrey R.

AU - Morey, Allen F.

AU - Jenkins, Adam C.

AU - Pruitt, Jeffrey H.

AU - Dugi, Daniel

AU - Morse, Brian

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Background: Although the American Association of the Surgery for Trauma Organ Injury Scale is the gold standard for staging renal trauma, it does not address characteristics of perirenal hematomas that may indicate significant hemorrhage. Angiographic embolization has become well established as an effective method for achieving hemostasis. We evaluated two novel radiographic indicators-perirenal hematoma size and intravascular contrast extravasation (ICE)-to test their association with subsequent angiographic embolization. Methods: Among 194 patients with renal trauma between 1999 and 2004, 52 having a grade 3 (n = 33) or grade 4 (n = 19) renal laceration were identified. Computed tomography scans were reviewed by a staff radiologist and urologist blinded to outcomes. ICE was defined as contrast within the perirenal hematoma during the portal venous phase having signal density matching contrast in the renal artery. Hematoma size was determined in four ways: hematoma area (HA), hematoma to kidney area ratio (HKR), difference between hematoma and kidney area (HKD), and perirenal hematoma rim distance (PRD). Results: Of the 52 patients, 8 had ICE and 4 of these (50%) required embolization, whereas none of the 42 (0%) patients without ICE needed embolization (p = 0.001). Likewise, all four measures of perirenal hematoma size assessed were significantly greater in patients receiving embolization [HA (128.3 vs. 75.4 cm2, p = 0.009), HKR (2.75 vs. 1.65, p = 0.008), HKD (76.5 vs. 30.2 cm2, p = 0.006), and PRD (4.0 vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.041)]. Conclusion: Perirenal hematoma size and ICE are readily detectible radiographic features and are associated with the need for angiographic embolization.

AB - Background: Although the American Association of the Surgery for Trauma Organ Injury Scale is the gold standard for staging renal trauma, it does not address characteristics of perirenal hematomas that may indicate significant hemorrhage. Angiographic embolization has become well established as an effective method for achieving hemostasis. We evaluated two novel radiographic indicators-perirenal hematoma size and intravascular contrast extravasation (ICE)-to test their association with subsequent angiographic embolization. Methods: Among 194 patients with renal trauma between 1999 and 2004, 52 having a grade 3 (n = 33) or grade 4 (n = 19) renal laceration were identified. Computed tomography scans were reviewed by a staff radiologist and urologist blinded to outcomes. ICE was defined as contrast within the perirenal hematoma during the portal venous phase having signal density matching contrast in the renal artery. Hematoma size was determined in four ways: hematoma area (HA), hematoma to kidney area ratio (HKR), difference between hematoma and kidney area (HKD), and perirenal hematoma rim distance (PRD). Results: Of the 52 patients, 8 had ICE and 4 of these (50%) required embolization, whereas none of the 42 (0%) patients without ICE needed embolization (p = 0.001). Likewise, all four measures of perirenal hematoma size assessed were significantly greater in patients receiving embolization [HA (128.3 vs. 75.4 cm2, p = 0.009), HKR (2.75 vs. 1.65, p = 0.008), HKD (76.5 vs. 30.2 cm2, p = 0.006), and PRD (4.0 vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.041)]. Conclusion: Perirenal hematoma size and ICE are readily detectible radiographic features and are associated with the need for angiographic embolization.

KW - CT scan

KW - Embolization

KW - Renal

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449097687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449097687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181af6ef4

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181af6ef4

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 578

EP - 582

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 3

ER -