Race, resource use, and survival in seriously ill hospitalized adults

Russell S. Phillips, Mary Beth Homel, Joan M. Teno, Paul Bellamy, Steven K. Broste, Robert M. Califf, Humberto Vidaillet, Roger B. Davis, Lawrence H. Muhlbaier, Alfred F. Connors, Joanne Lynn, Lee Goldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations


OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between patient race and hospital resource use. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five geographically diverse teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients were 9,105 hospitalized adults with one of nine illnesses associated with an average 6-month mortality of 50%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measures of resource use included: a modified version of the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS): performance of any of five procedures (operation, dialysis, pulmonary artery catheterization, endoscopy, and bronchoscopy); and hospital charges, adjusted by the Medicare cost-to-charge ratio per cost center at each participating hospital. The median patient age was 65; 79% were white. 16% African- American, 3% Hispanic, and 2% other races; 47% died within 6 months. After adjusting for other sociodemographic factors, severity of illness, functional status, and study site, African-Americans were less likely to receive any of five procedures on study day 1 and 3 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60, 0.81). In addition, African-Americans had lower TISS scores on study day I and 3 (OR 1.8; 95% CI -1.3, -2.4) and lower estimated costs of hospitalization (OR $2,805; 95% CI -$1,672, -$3.883). Results were similar after adjustment for patients' preferences and physician's prognostic estimates. Differences in resource use were less marked after adjusting for the specialty of the attending physician but remained significant. In a subset analysis, cardiologists were less likely to care for African-Americans with congestive heart failure (p < .001), and cardiologists used more resources (p <.001). After adjustment for other sociodemographic factors, severity of illness, functional status, and study site, survival was slightly better for African-American patients (hazard ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.84, 0.98) than for white or other race patients. CONCLUSIONS: Seriously ill African-Americans received less resource-intensive care than other patients after adjustment for other sociodemographic factors and for severity of illness. Some of these differences may be due to differential use of subspecialists. The observed differences in resource use were not associated with a survival advantage for white or other race patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-396
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes


  • African-Americans
  • race
  • resource use
  • specialty care
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Race, resource use, and survival in seriously ill hospitalized adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this