Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty

Robert B. Mayhew, Timothy Svec, Craig W. Johnson, Scott R. Makins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Endodontic literature suggests that only about 60% of endodontic therapy meets current technical standards and that general dentists may be making a significant contribution to this compromised care. If so, where in the continuum of dental education does this begin. This study evaluated the quality of obturation in mandibular molars provided on the one hand by 3rd year dental students instructed by endodontic faculty, and on the other hand by 4th year students instructed by general dentistry faculty, versus the quality of obturation achieved by endodontic residents who served as a control for both groups. Final radiographs were chosen from students in all three groups so that there were 22 samples per group. Three evaluators rank-ordered the radiographs. In order of excellence, the results were: (a) residents, (b) 3rd year students, and (c) 4th year students. There was no significant difference between the 3rd year students or the residents, only between residents and 4th year students (p <0.05). The reasons for this outcome may range from dental school objectives to the private practice procedures of the general dentists who instructed the 4th year students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)461-463
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume25
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endodontics
Dentistry
Students
Dentists
Root Canal Obturation
Dental Education
Dental Students
Dental Schools
Private Practice
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Mayhew, R. B., Svec, T., Johnson, C. W., & Makins, S. R. (1999). Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty. Journal of Endodontics, 25(6), 461-463.

Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty. / Mayhew, Robert B.; Svec, Timothy; Johnson, Craig W.; Makins, Scott R.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 25, No. 6, 06.1999, p. 461-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mayhew, RB, Svec, T, Johnson, CW & Makins, SR 1999, 'Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty', Journal of Endodontics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 461-463.
Mayhew, Robert B. ; Svec, Timothy ; Johnson, Craig W. ; Makins, Scott R. / Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty. In: Journal of Endodontics. 1999 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 461-463.
@article{d0fd93ca4f80482789c06dd00cb4120a,
title = "Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty",
abstract = "Endodontic literature suggests that only about 60{\%} of endodontic therapy meets current technical standards and that general dentists may be making a significant contribution to this compromised care. If so, where in the continuum of dental education does this begin. This study evaluated the quality of obturation in mandibular molars provided on the one hand by 3rd year dental students instructed by endodontic faculty, and on the other hand by 4th year students instructed by general dentistry faculty, versus the quality of obturation achieved by endodontic residents who served as a control for both groups. Final radiographs were chosen from students in all three groups so that there were 22 samples per group. Three evaluators rank-ordered the radiographs. In order of excellence, the results were: (a) residents, (b) 3rd year students, and (c) 4th year students. There was no significant difference between the 3rd year students or the residents, only between residents and 4th year students (p <0.05). The reasons for this outcome may range from dental school objectives to the private practice procedures of the general dentists who instructed the 4th year students.",
author = "Mayhew, {Robert B.} and Timothy Svec and Johnson, {Craig W.} and Makins, {Scott R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "461--463",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of obturation in student cases instructed by endodontic versus general dentistry faculty

AU - Mayhew, Robert B.

AU - Svec, Timothy

AU - Johnson, Craig W.

AU - Makins, Scott R.

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Endodontic literature suggests that only about 60% of endodontic therapy meets current technical standards and that general dentists may be making a significant contribution to this compromised care. If so, where in the continuum of dental education does this begin. This study evaluated the quality of obturation in mandibular molars provided on the one hand by 3rd year dental students instructed by endodontic faculty, and on the other hand by 4th year students instructed by general dentistry faculty, versus the quality of obturation achieved by endodontic residents who served as a control for both groups. Final radiographs were chosen from students in all three groups so that there were 22 samples per group. Three evaluators rank-ordered the radiographs. In order of excellence, the results were: (a) residents, (b) 3rd year students, and (c) 4th year students. There was no significant difference between the 3rd year students or the residents, only between residents and 4th year students (p <0.05). The reasons for this outcome may range from dental school objectives to the private practice procedures of the general dentists who instructed the 4th year students.

AB - Endodontic literature suggests that only about 60% of endodontic therapy meets current technical standards and that general dentists may be making a significant contribution to this compromised care. If so, where in the continuum of dental education does this begin. This study evaluated the quality of obturation in mandibular molars provided on the one hand by 3rd year dental students instructed by endodontic faculty, and on the other hand by 4th year students instructed by general dentistry faculty, versus the quality of obturation achieved by endodontic residents who served as a control for both groups. Final radiographs were chosen from students in all three groups so that there were 22 samples per group. Three evaluators rank-ordered the radiographs. In order of excellence, the results were: (a) residents, (b) 3rd year students, and (c) 4th year students. There was no significant difference between the 3rd year students or the residents, only between residents and 4th year students (p <0.05). The reasons for this outcome may range from dental school objectives to the private practice procedures of the general dentists who instructed the 4th year students.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033143139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033143139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10530252

AN - SCOPUS:0033143139

VL - 25

SP - 461

EP - 463

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 6

ER -