Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU

Robert Macauley, Robert D. Orr

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Case narrative:One Sunday afternoon, the on-call ethicist (one of the co-authors) received a consultation request from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our 500-bed academic medical center. Two weeks earlier, a baby had been born at term with skeletal, renal, cardiac, and (most profoundly) pulmonary abnormalities but no known neurologic defects. The baby had been intubated in the delivery room and subsequently developed pulmonary hypertension, requiring high ventilator settings and inspired oxygen concentration and necessitating that the patient be chemically paralyzed.Because the patient’s abnormalities were not consistent with any defined syndrome, his long-term prognosis remained unclear – the neonatology team covering on the weekend described it as “quite bleak.” It was possible that the patient could become permanently ventilator-dependent, although it was also possible that he would eventually breathe on his own, albeit still with limb deformities and renal problems. The only certainty at that time was that the patient would require weeks to months of ventilatory support to survive.Two days earlier, the NICU team had met with the family, and the decision was made to de-escalate the patient’s level of life support by withdrawing chemical paralysis and making the patient DNR (do not resuscitate). Although mechanical ventilation was continued, most people involved in the case (including the patient’s parents) did not expect the baby to survive. However, to everyone’s surprise, over the next 48 hours, his respiratory condition stabilized and even improved. On Sunday afternoon, the parents requested discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComplex Ethics Consultations
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages15-21
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9780511663437
ISBN (Print)9780521874380
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

baby
quality of life
moral philosophy
parents
deformity
weekend
hypertension
narrative
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Macauley, R., & Orr, R. D. (2008). Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU. In Complex Ethics Consultations (pp. 15-21). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663437.003

Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU. / Macauley, Robert; Orr, Robert D.

Complex Ethics Consultations. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 15-21.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Macauley, R & Orr, RD 2008, Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU. in Complex Ethics Consultations. Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663437.003
Macauley R, Orr RD. Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU. In Complex Ethics Consultations. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 15-21 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663437.003
Macauley, Robert ; Orr, Robert D. / Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU. Complex Ethics Consultations. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 15-21
@inbook{c29f92563b814764baf9b41c591da8ed,
title = "Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU",
abstract = "Case narrative:One Sunday afternoon, the on-call ethicist (one of the co-authors) received a consultation request from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our 500-bed academic medical center. Two weeks earlier, a baby had been born at term with skeletal, renal, cardiac, and (most profoundly) pulmonary abnormalities but no known neurologic defects. The baby had been intubated in the delivery room and subsequently developed pulmonary hypertension, requiring high ventilator settings and inspired oxygen concentration and necessitating that the patient be chemically paralyzed.Because the patient’s abnormalities were not consistent with any defined syndrome, his long-term prognosis remained unclear – the neonatology team covering on the weekend described it as “quite bleak.” It was possible that the patient could become permanently ventilator-dependent, although it was also possible that he would eventually breathe on his own, albeit still with limb deformities and renal problems. The only certainty at that time was that the patient would require weeks to months of ventilatory support to survive.Two days earlier, the NICU team had met with the family, and the decision was made to de-escalate the patient’s level of life support by withdrawing chemical paralysis and making the patient DNR (do not resuscitate). Although mechanical ventilation was continued, most people involved in the case (including the patient’s parents) did not expect the baby to survive. However, to everyone’s surprise, over the next 48 hours, his respiratory condition stabilized and even improved. On Sunday afternoon, the parents requested discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.",
author = "Robert Macauley and Orr, {Robert D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511663437.003",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521874380",
pages = "15--21",
booktitle = "Complex Ethics Consultations",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Quality of life - and of ethics consultation - in the NICU

AU - Macauley, Robert

AU - Orr, Robert D.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Case narrative:One Sunday afternoon, the on-call ethicist (one of the co-authors) received a consultation request from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our 500-bed academic medical center. Two weeks earlier, a baby had been born at term with skeletal, renal, cardiac, and (most profoundly) pulmonary abnormalities but no known neurologic defects. The baby had been intubated in the delivery room and subsequently developed pulmonary hypertension, requiring high ventilator settings and inspired oxygen concentration and necessitating that the patient be chemically paralyzed.Because the patient’s abnormalities were not consistent with any defined syndrome, his long-term prognosis remained unclear – the neonatology team covering on the weekend described it as “quite bleak.” It was possible that the patient could become permanently ventilator-dependent, although it was also possible that he would eventually breathe on his own, albeit still with limb deformities and renal problems. The only certainty at that time was that the patient would require weeks to months of ventilatory support to survive.Two days earlier, the NICU team had met with the family, and the decision was made to de-escalate the patient’s level of life support by withdrawing chemical paralysis and making the patient DNR (do not resuscitate). Although mechanical ventilation was continued, most people involved in the case (including the patient’s parents) did not expect the baby to survive. However, to everyone’s surprise, over the next 48 hours, his respiratory condition stabilized and even improved. On Sunday afternoon, the parents requested discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.

AB - Case narrative:One Sunday afternoon, the on-call ethicist (one of the co-authors) received a consultation request from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our 500-bed academic medical center. Two weeks earlier, a baby had been born at term with skeletal, renal, cardiac, and (most profoundly) pulmonary abnormalities but no known neurologic defects. The baby had been intubated in the delivery room and subsequently developed pulmonary hypertension, requiring high ventilator settings and inspired oxygen concentration and necessitating that the patient be chemically paralyzed.Because the patient’s abnormalities were not consistent with any defined syndrome, his long-term prognosis remained unclear – the neonatology team covering on the weekend described it as “quite bleak.” It was possible that the patient could become permanently ventilator-dependent, although it was also possible that he would eventually breathe on his own, albeit still with limb deformities and renal problems. The only certainty at that time was that the patient would require weeks to months of ventilatory support to survive.Two days earlier, the NICU team had met with the family, and the decision was made to de-escalate the patient’s level of life support by withdrawing chemical paralysis and making the patient DNR (do not resuscitate). Although mechanical ventilation was continued, most people involved in the case (including the patient’s parents) did not expect the baby to survive. However, to everyone’s surprise, over the next 48 hours, his respiratory condition stabilized and even improved. On Sunday afternoon, the parents requested discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927011398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927011398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511663437.003

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511663437.003

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927011398

SN - 9780521874380

SP - 15

EP - 21

BT - Complex Ethics Consultations

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -