Quality Metrics in Urology

John C. Lynam, Christopher Tessier, Timothy D. Averch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The focus of quality metrics is to ensure that physicians provide and practice within a standard of care, and to maximize patient benefit and safety. Several quality reporting programs in urology such as SCIP (Surgical Care Improvement Project, PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) and OPPE (Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation)/FPPE (Focused Professional Practice Evaluation) have been used to review and monitor standards of care and improve medical care quality. Urological databases are emerging with the main focus of reviewing and assessing health care delivery quality and patient outcomes. Such data will likely influence future quality improvement measures and standards. Awareness and understanding of these programs and measurements are vital to continued successful urological practice. Methods: AUA (American Urological Association) and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) documents were used. We reviewed program specific requirements, including minimal required data, timeline requirements, and specific incentives and penalties. Results: Quality measures and programs in urology aim to monitor, standardize and improve medical care delivery in the United States. Since the implementation of electronic health records, the ability to review individual and group medical practices has become available and reviewable by outside agencies. Universal practice standards and government monitoring of individual and group achievement of those expectations are the current direction of health care. This is exemplified by the United States DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) announcement of transitioning Medicare to a value based reimbursement model and the 9 HCTTF (Health Care Transformation Task Force) principles for accountable care organization footprint expansion. Conclusions: The quality era has arrived. Its continued impact on health care delivery will be noted as public reporting and payment modifications based on quality indicators and performance metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUrology Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urology
Delivery of Health Care
Professional Practice
Standard of Care
Accountable Care Organizations
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Physicians
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Aptitude
Electronic Health Records
Quality of Health Care
Advisory Committees
Patient Safety
Medicare
Quality Improvement
Motivation
Databases

Keywords

  • Accountable care organizations
  • Health care reform
  • Quality control
  • Registries
  • Urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Quality Metrics in Urology. / Lynam, John C.; Tessier, Christopher; Averch, Timothy D.

In: Urology Practice, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lynam, John C. ; Tessier, Christopher ; Averch, Timothy D. / Quality Metrics in Urology. In: Urology Practice. 2015.
@article{ba27550c15cf4dc0a9d52dc73a3d5316,
title = "Quality Metrics in Urology",
abstract = "Introduction: The focus of quality metrics is to ensure that physicians provide and practice within a standard of care, and to maximize patient benefit and safety. Several quality reporting programs in urology such as SCIP (Surgical Care Improvement Project, PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) and OPPE (Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation)/FPPE (Focused Professional Practice Evaluation) have been used to review and monitor standards of care and improve medical care quality. Urological databases are emerging with the main focus of reviewing and assessing health care delivery quality and patient outcomes. Such data will likely influence future quality improvement measures and standards. Awareness and understanding of these programs and measurements are vital to continued successful urological practice. Methods: AUA (American Urological Association) and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) documents were used. We reviewed program specific requirements, including minimal required data, timeline requirements, and specific incentives and penalties. Results: Quality measures and programs in urology aim to monitor, standardize and improve medical care delivery in the United States. Since the implementation of electronic health records, the ability to review individual and group medical practices has become available and reviewable by outside agencies. Universal practice standards and government monitoring of individual and group achievement of those expectations are the current direction of health care. This is exemplified by the United States DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) announcement of transitioning Medicare to a value based reimbursement model and the 9 HCTTF (Health Care Transformation Task Force) principles for accountable care organization footprint expansion. Conclusions: The quality era has arrived. Its continued impact on health care delivery will be noted as public reporting and payment modifications based on quality indicators and performance metrics.",
keywords = "Accountable care organizations, Health care reform, Quality control, Registries, Urology",
author = "Lynam, {John C.} and Christopher Tessier and Averch, {Timothy D.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.urpr.2015.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Urology Practice",
issn = "2352-0779",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality Metrics in Urology

AU - Lynam, John C.

AU - Tessier, Christopher

AU - Averch, Timothy D.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: The focus of quality metrics is to ensure that physicians provide and practice within a standard of care, and to maximize patient benefit and safety. Several quality reporting programs in urology such as SCIP (Surgical Care Improvement Project, PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) and OPPE (Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation)/FPPE (Focused Professional Practice Evaluation) have been used to review and monitor standards of care and improve medical care quality. Urological databases are emerging with the main focus of reviewing and assessing health care delivery quality and patient outcomes. Such data will likely influence future quality improvement measures and standards. Awareness and understanding of these programs and measurements are vital to continued successful urological practice. Methods: AUA (American Urological Association) and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) documents were used. We reviewed program specific requirements, including minimal required data, timeline requirements, and specific incentives and penalties. Results: Quality measures and programs in urology aim to monitor, standardize and improve medical care delivery in the United States. Since the implementation of electronic health records, the ability to review individual and group medical practices has become available and reviewable by outside agencies. Universal practice standards and government monitoring of individual and group achievement of those expectations are the current direction of health care. This is exemplified by the United States DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) announcement of transitioning Medicare to a value based reimbursement model and the 9 HCTTF (Health Care Transformation Task Force) principles for accountable care organization footprint expansion. Conclusions: The quality era has arrived. Its continued impact on health care delivery will be noted as public reporting and payment modifications based on quality indicators and performance metrics.

AB - Introduction: The focus of quality metrics is to ensure that physicians provide and practice within a standard of care, and to maximize patient benefit and safety. Several quality reporting programs in urology such as SCIP (Surgical Care Improvement Project, PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) and OPPE (Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation)/FPPE (Focused Professional Practice Evaluation) have been used to review and monitor standards of care and improve medical care quality. Urological databases are emerging with the main focus of reviewing and assessing health care delivery quality and patient outcomes. Such data will likely influence future quality improvement measures and standards. Awareness and understanding of these programs and measurements are vital to continued successful urological practice. Methods: AUA (American Urological Association) and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) documents were used. We reviewed program specific requirements, including minimal required data, timeline requirements, and specific incentives and penalties. Results: Quality measures and programs in urology aim to monitor, standardize and improve medical care delivery in the United States. Since the implementation of electronic health records, the ability to review individual and group medical practices has become available and reviewable by outside agencies. Universal practice standards and government monitoring of individual and group achievement of those expectations are the current direction of health care. This is exemplified by the United States DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) announcement of transitioning Medicare to a value based reimbursement model and the 9 HCTTF (Health Care Transformation Task Force) principles for accountable care organization footprint expansion. Conclusions: The quality era has arrived. Its continued impact on health care delivery will be noted as public reporting and payment modifications based on quality indicators and performance metrics.

KW - Accountable care organizations

KW - Health care reform

KW - Quality control

KW - Registries

KW - Urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949671559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949671559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.05.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84949671559

JO - Urology Practice

JF - Urology Practice

SN - 2352-0779

ER -