Quality Assurance in Telehealth: Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators

Daniel Halpren-Ruder, Anna Marie Chang, Judd E. Hollander, Anuj Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Value enhancing telehealth (TH) lacks a robust body of formal clinically focused quality assessment studies. Innovations such as telehealth must always demonstrate that it preserves or hopefully advances quality. Introduction: We sought to determine whether adherence to the evidence-based Choosing Wisely (CW) recommendations (antibiotic stewardship) for acute sinusitis differs for encounters through direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine verses "in-person" care in an emergency department (ED) or an urgent care (UC) center. Materials and Methods: Study design was a retrospective review. Patients with a symptom complex consistent with acute sinusitis treated through DTC were matched with ED and UC patients, based upon time of visit. Charts were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, chief complaint, final diagnosis, presence or absence of criteria within the CW guidelines, and whether or not antibiotics were prescribed. The main outcome was adherence to the CW campaign recommendations. Results: A total of 570 visits were studied: 190 DTC, 190 ED, and 190 UC visits. The predominant chief complaints were upper respiratory infection (36%), sore throat (25%), and sinusitis (18%). Overall, there was a 67% (95% CI 62.3-71.7) adherence rate with the CW guidelines for sinusitis: DTC visits (71%), ED visits (68%), and UC visits (61%). There was a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.29) in adherence to CW guidelines based upon type of visit (DTC, UC, and ED). Discussion: The challenge is to demonstrate whether or not DTC TH compromises quality. Conclusion: In this study, DTC visits were associated with at least as good an adherence to the CW campaign recommendations as emergency medicine (EM) and UC in-person visits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)599-603
Number of pages5
JournalTelemedicine and e-Health
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Ambulatory Care
Sinusitis
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergency Medical Services
Guidelines
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Pharyngitis
Emergency Medicine
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Respiratory Tract Infections

Keywords

  • education
  • information management
  • medical records
  • telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Halpren-Ruder, D., Chang, A. M., Hollander, J. E., & Shah, A. (2019). Quality Assurance in Telehealth: Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25(7), 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0149

Quality Assurance in Telehealth : Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators. / Halpren-Ruder, Daniel; Chang, Anna Marie; Hollander, Judd E.; Shah, Anuj.

In: Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 25, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 599-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halpren-Ruder, D, Chang, AM, Hollander, JE & Shah, A 2019, 'Quality Assurance in Telehealth: Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators', Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0149
Halpren-Ruder, Daniel ; Chang, Anna Marie ; Hollander, Judd E. ; Shah, Anuj. / Quality Assurance in Telehealth : Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators. In: Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 599-603.
@article{b952e1c306d1412980cf68e72bcd4d93,
title = "Quality Assurance in Telehealth: Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators",
abstract = "Background: Value enhancing telehealth (TH) lacks a robust body of formal clinically focused quality assessment studies. Innovations such as telehealth must always demonstrate that it preserves or hopefully advances quality. Introduction: We sought to determine whether adherence to the evidence-based Choosing Wisely (CW) recommendations (antibiotic stewardship) for acute sinusitis differs for encounters through direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine verses {"}in-person{"} care in an emergency department (ED) or an urgent care (UC) center. Materials and Methods: Study design was a retrospective review. Patients with a symptom complex consistent with acute sinusitis treated through DTC were matched with ED and UC patients, based upon time of visit. Charts were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, chief complaint, final diagnosis, presence or absence of criteria within the CW guidelines, and whether or not antibiotics were prescribed. The main outcome was adherence to the CW campaign recommendations. Results: A total of 570 visits were studied: 190 DTC, 190 ED, and 190 UC visits. The predominant chief complaints were upper respiratory infection (36{\%}), sore throat (25{\%}), and sinusitis (18{\%}). Overall, there was a 67{\%} (95{\%} CI 62.3-71.7) adherence rate with the CW guidelines for sinusitis: DTC visits (71{\%}), ED visits (68{\%}), and UC visits (61{\%}). There was a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.29) in adherence to CW guidelines based upon type of visit (DTC, UC, and ED). Discussion: The challenge is to demonstrate whether or not DTC TH compromises quality. Conclusion: In this study, DTC visits were associated with at least as good an adherence to the CW campaign recommendations as emergency medicine (EM) and UC in-person visits.",
keywords = "education, information management, medical records, telemedicine",
author = "Daniel Halpren-Ruder and Chang, {Anna Marie} and Hollander, {Judd E.} and Anuj Shah",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/tmj.2018.0149",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "599--603",
journal = "Telemedicine and e-Health",
issn = "1530-5627",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality Assurance in Telehealth

T2 - Adherence to Evidence-Based Indicators

AU - Halpren-Ruder, Daniel

AU - Chang, Anna Marie

AU - Hollander, Judd E.

AU - Shah, Anuj

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Background: Value enhancing telehealth (TH) lacks a robust body of formal clinically focused quality assessment studies. Innovations such as telehealth must always demonstrate that it preserves or hopefully advances quality. Introduction: We sought to determine whether adherence to the evidence-based Choosing Wisely (CW) recommendations (antibiotic stewardship) for acute sinusitis differs for encounters through direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine verses "in-person" care in an emergency department (ED) or an urgent care (UC) center. Materials and Methods: Study design was a retrospective review. Patients with a symptom complex consistent with acute sinusitis treated through DTC were matched with ED and UC patients, based upon time of visit. Charts were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, chief complaint, final diagnosis, presence or absence of criteria within the CW guidelines, and whether or not antibiotics were prescribed. The main outcome was adherence to the CW campaign recommendations. Results: A total of 570 visits were studied: 190 DTC, 190 ED, and 190 UC visits. The predominant chief complaints were upper respiratory infection (36%), sore throat (25%), and sinusitis (18%). Overall, there was a 67% (95% CI 62.3-71.7) adherence rate with the CW guidelines for sinusitis: DTC visits (71%), ED visits (68%), and UC visits (61%). There was a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.29) in adherence to CW guidelines based upon type of visit (DTC, UC, and ED). Discussion: The challenge is to demonstrate whether or not DTC TH compromises quality. Conclusion: In this study, DTC visits were associated with at least as good an adherence to the CW campaign recommendations as emergency medicine (EM) and UC in-person visits.

AB - Background: Value enhancing telehealth (TH) lacks a robust body of formal clinically focused quality assessment studies. Innovations such as telehealth must always demonstrate that it preserves or hopefully advances quality. Introduction: We sought to determine whether adherence to the evidence-based Choosing Wisely (CW) recommendations (antibiotic stewardship) for acute sinusitis differs for encounters through direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine verses "in-person" care in an emergency department (ED) or an urgent care (UC) center. Materials and Methods: Study design was a retrospective review. Patients with a symptom complex consistent with acute sinusitis treated through DTC were matched with ED and UC patients, based upon time of visit. Charts were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, chief complaint, final diagnosis, presence or absence of criteria within the CW guidelines, and whether or not antibiotics were prescribed. The main outcome was adherence to the CW campaign recommendations. Results: A total of 570 visits were studied: 190 DTC, 190 ED, and 190 UC visits. The predominant chief complaints were upper respiratory infection (36%), sore throat (25%), and sinusitis (18%). Overall, there was a 67% (95% CI 62.3-71.7) adherence rate with the CW guidelines for sinusitis: DTC visits (71%), ED visits (68%), and UC visits (61%). There was a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.29) in adherence to CW guidelines based upon type of visit (DTC, UC, and ED). Discussion: The challenge is to demonstrate whether or not DTC TH compromises quality. Conclusion: In this study, DTC visits were associated with at least as good an adherence to the CW campaign recommendations as emergency medicine (EM) and UC in-person visits.

KW - education

KW - information management

KW - medical records

KW - telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068908329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068908329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2018.0149

DO - 10.1089/tmj.2018.0149

M3 - Article

C2 - 30070966

AN - SCOPUS:85068908329

VL - 25

SP - 599

EP - 603

JO - Telemedicine and e-Health

JF - Telemedicine and e-Health

SN - 1530-5627

IS - 7

ER -