Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy

Pramit M. Phal, Alexander Usmanov, Gary Nesbit, James (Jim) Anderson, David Spencer, Paul Wang, Jonathan A. Helwig, Colin Roberts, Bronwyn Hamilton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. MRI at 3 T, which has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than 1.5-T MRI, is potentially more sensitive and specific at delineating epileptogenic lesions and may influence management of refractory epilepsy. The purposes of the current study were to compare image quality of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy and, in cases of focal epilepsy, to compare the two field strengths in terms of lesion detection and characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed on 50 sets of MR images of 25 patients who underwent both 3-T and 1.5-T brain imaging with a dedicated epilepsy protocol, including fast spin-echo T2-weighted, coronal FLAIR, coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery, and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequences. Parameters assessed were distortion and artifact, lesion conspicuity, gray-white matter differentiation, and motion. Each pulse sequence was graded on a 4-point scale. Reviewers performed qualitative assessments of the site of abnormality and the most likely diagnosis. RESULTS. MRI at 3 T outperformed MRI at 1.5 T in all four parameters and was statistically superior (p <0.05) to 1.5-T MRI in all categories except motion. On 3-T MRI, lesions were detected in 65 of 74 cases compared with 55 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0364), and lesions were accurately characterized in 63 of 74 cases compared with 51 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0194). The odds ratios showed identification of a focal epileptogenic lesion with 3-T MRI 2.57 times as likely as identification with 1.5-T MRI and accurate characterization of lesions 2.66 times as likely as characterization with 1.5-T MRI. CONCLUSION. In evaluation of epilepsy, MRI at 3 T performed better than 1.5-T MRI in image quality, detection of structural lesions, and characterization of lesions. High-field-strength imaging should be considered for patients with intractable epilepsy and normal or equivocal findings on 1.5-T MRI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)890-895
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume191
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Partial Epilepsy
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Neuroimaging
Artifacts
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • 3-T MRI
  • Focal epilepsy
  • Medically refractory epilepsy
  • MRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy. / Phal, Pramit M.; Usmanov, Alexander; Nesbit, Gary; Anderson, James (Jim); Spencer, David; Wang, Paul; Helwig, Jonathan A.; Roberts, Colin; Hamilton, Bronwyn.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 191, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 890-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phal, Pramit M. ; Usmanov, Alexander ; Nesbit, Gary ; Anderson, James (Jim) ; Spencer, David ; Wang, Paul ; Helwig, Jonathan A. ; Roberts, Colin ; Hamilton, Bronwyn. / Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008 ; Vol. 191, No. 3. pp. 890-895.
@article{dfcda6cbd0984e8c8a7caed0a4d6fa27,
title = "Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. MRI at 3 T, which has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than 1.5-T MRI, is potentially more sensitive and specific at delineating epileptogenic lesions and may influence management of refractory epilepsy. The purposes of the current study were to compare image quality of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy and, in cases of focal epilepsy, to compare the two field strengths in terms of lesion detection and characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed on 50 sets of MR images of 25 patients who underwent both 3-T and 1.5-T brain imaging with a dedicated epilepsy protocol, including fast spin-echo T2-weighted, coronal FLAIR, coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery, and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequences. Parameters assessed were distortion and artifact, lesion conspicuity, gray-white matter differentiation, and motion. Each pulse sequence was graded on a 4-point scale. Reviewers performed qualitative assessments of the site of abnormality and the most likely diagnosis. RESULTS. MRI at 3 T outperformed MRI at 1.5 T in all four parameters and was statistically superior (p <0.05) to 1.5-T MRI in all categories except motion. On 3-T MRI, lesions were detected in 65 of 74 cases compared with 55 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0364), and lesions were accurately characterized in 63 of 74 cases compared with 51 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0194). The odds ratios showed identification of a focal epileptogenic lesion with 3-T MRI 2.57 times as likely as identification with 1.5-T MRI and accurate characterization of lesions 2.66 times as likely as characterization with 1.5-T MRI. CONCLUSION. In evaluation of epilepsy, MRI at 3 T performed better than 1.5-T MRI in image quality, detection of structural lesions, and characterization of lesions. High-field-strength imaging should be considered for patients with intractable epilepsy and normal or equivocal findings on 1.5-T MRI.",
keywords = "3-T MRI, Focal epilepsy, Medically refractory epilepsy, MRI",
author = "Phal, {Pramit M.} and Alexander Usmanov and Gary Nesbit and Anderson, {James (Jim)} and David Spencer and Paul Wang and Helwig, {Jonathan A.} and Colin Roberts and Bronwyn Hamilton",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.07.3933",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "890--895",
journal = "AJR. American journal of roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy

AU - Phal, Pramit M.

AU - Usmanov, Alexander

AU - Nesbit, Gary

AU - Anderson, James (Jim)

AU - Spencer, David

AU - Wang, Paul

AU - Helwig, Jonathan A.

AU - Roberts, Colin

AU - Hamilton, Bronwyn

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE. MRI at 3 T, which has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than 1.5-T MRI, is potentially more sensitive and specific at delineating epileptogenic lesions and may influence management of refractory epilepsy. The purposes of the current study were to compare image quality of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy and, in cases of focal epilepsy, to compare the two field strengths in terms of lesion detection and characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed on 50 sets of MR images of 25 patients who underwent both 3-T and 1.5-T brain imaging with a dedicated epilepsy protocol, including fast spin-echo T2-weighted, coronal FLAIR, coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery, and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequences. Parameters assessed were distortion and artifact, lesion conspicuity, gray-white matter differentiation, and motion. Each pulse sequence was graded on a 4-point scale. Reviewers performed qualitative assessments of the site of abnormality and the most likely diagnosis. RESULTS. MRI at 3 T outperformed MRI at 1.5 T in all four parameters and was statistically superior (p <0.05) to 1.5-T MRI in all categories except motion. On 3-T MRI, lesions were detected in 65 of 74 cases compared with 55 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0364), and lesions were accurately characterized in 63 of 74 cases compared with 51 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0194). The odds ratios showed identification of a focal epileptogenic lesion with 3-T MRI 2.57 times as likely as identification with 1.5-T MRI and accurate characterization of lesions 2.66 times as likely as characterization with 1.5-T MRI. CONCLUSION. In evaluation of epilepsy, MRI at 3 T performed better than 1.5-T MRI in image quality, detection of structural lesions, and characterization of lesions. High-field-strength imaging should be considered for patients with intractable epilepsy and normal or equivocal findings on 1.5-T MRI.

AB - OBJECTIVE. MRI at 3 T, which has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than 1.5-T MRI, is potentially more sensitive and specific at delineating epileptogenic lesions and may influence management of refractory epilepsy. The purposes of the current study were to compare image quality of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy and, in cases of focal epilepsy, to compare the two field strengths in terms of lesion detection and characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed on 50 sets of MR images of 25 patients who underwent both 3-T and 1.5-T brain imaging with a dedicated epilepsy protocol, including fast spin-echo T2-weighted, coronal FLAIR, coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery, and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequences. Parameters assessed were distortion and artifact, lesion conspicuity, gray-white matter differentiation, and motion. Each pulse sequence was graded on a 4-point scale. Reviewers performed qualitative assessments of the site of abnormality and the most likely diagnosis. RESULTS. MRI at 3 T outperformed MRI at 1.5 T in all four parameters and was statistically superior (p <0.05) to 1.5-T MRI in all categories except motion. On 3-T MRI, lesions were detected in 65 of 74 cases compared with 55 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0364), and lesions were accurately characterized in 63 of 74 cases compared with 51 of 74 cases at 1.5 T (p = 0.0194). The odds ratios showed identification of a focal epileptogenic lesion with 3-T MRI 2.57 times as likely as identification with 1.5-T MRI and accurate characterization of lesions 2.66 times as likely as characterization with 1.5-T MRI. CONCLUSION. In evaluation of epilepsy, MRI at 3 T performed better than 1.5-T MRI in image quality, detection of structural lesions, and characterization of lesions. High-field-strength imaging should be considered for patients with intractable epilepsy and normal or equivocal findings on 1.5-T MRI.

KW - 3-T MRI

KW - Focal epilepsy

KW - Medically refractory epilepsy

KW - MRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51349151723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51349151723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.07.3933

DO - 10.2214/AJR.07.3933

M3 - Article

C2 - 18716125

AN - SCOPUS:51349151723

VL - 191

SP - 890

EP - 895

JO - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

JF - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -