Putting 'family' back in family planning

David Seifer, Howard Minkoff, Zaher Merhi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Family planning visits are designed to help women build families in a manner most compatible with their life goals. Women's knowledge regarding age-related fertility is suboptimal, and first wanted pregnancies are now occurring at older ages. Here we review the issue of diminishing chances of a pregnancy occurring in women over 30 years of age. A debate arises over whether to perform a standard fertility assessment at an age when, for example, oocyte freezing is still practical and feasible, knowing that the proven predictors in subfertile couples may be less informative, or even inappropriate, in women without complaints about fertility. Studies have demonstrated that if women knew that their fertility was diminishing, they might alter life plans, including having children sooner or considering oocyte preservation. Therefore, we argue that physicians need to make an effort to evaluate a woman's childbearing priorities, though not necessarily their fertility, during the initial family planning visit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-19
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Family Planning Services
Fertility
Oocytes
Pregnancy
Freezing
Physicians

Keywords

  • anti-Mullerian hormone
  • cryopreservation
  • family planning
  • oocyte freezing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Putting 'family' back in family planning. / Seifer, David; Minkoff, Howard; Merhi, Zaher.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 16-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seifer, D, Minkoff, H & Merhi, Z 2015, 'Putting 'family' back in family planning', Human Reproduction, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu304
Seifer, David ; Minkoff, Howard ; Merhi, Zaher. / Putting 'family' back in family planning. In: Human Reproduction. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 16-19.
@article{05d28d6e22a7457abd1e6bccf7f8a22e,
title = "Putting 'family' back in family planning",
abstract = "Family planning visits are designed to help women build families in a manner most compatible with their life goals. Women's knowledge regarding age-related fertility is suboptimal, and first wanted pregnancies are now occurring at older ages. Here we review the issue of diminishing chances of a pregnancy occurring in women over 30 years of age. A debate arises over whether to perform a standard fertility assessment at an age when, for example, oocyte freezing is still practical and feasible, knowing that the proven predictors in subfertile couples may be less informative, or even inappropriate, in women without complaints about fertility. Studies have demonstrated that if women knew that their fertility was diminishing, they might alter life plans, including having children sooner or considering oocyte preservation. Therefore, we argue that physicians need to make an effort to evaluate a woman's childbearing priorities, though not necessarily their fertility, during the initial family planning visit.",
keywords = "anti-Mullerian hormone, cryopreservation, family planning, oocyte freezing",
author = "David Seifer and Howard Minkoff and Zaher Merhi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/deu304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "16--19",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting 'family' back in family planning

AU - Seifer, David

AU - Minkoff, Howard

AU - Merhi, Zaher

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Family planning visits are designed to help women build families in a manner most compatible with their life goals. Women's knowledge regarding age-related fertility is suboptimal, and first wanted pregnancies are now occurring at older ages. Here we review the issue of diminishing chances of a pregnancy occurring in women over 30 years of age. A debate arises over whether to perform a standard fertility assessment at an age when, for example, oocyte freezing is still practical and feasible, knowing that the proven predictors in subfertile couples may be less informative, or even inappropriate, in women without complaints about fertility. Studies have demonstrated that if women knew that their fertility was diminishing, they might alter life plans, including having children sooner or considering oocyte preservation. Therefore, we argue that physicians need to make an effort to evaluate a woman's childbearing priorities, though not necessarily their fertility, during the initial family planning visit.

AB - Family planning visits are designed to help women build families in a manner most compatible with their life goals. Women's knowledge regarding age-related fertility is suboptimal, and first wanted pregnancies are now occurring at older ages. Here we review the issue of diminishing chances of a pregnancy occurring in women over 30 years of age. A debate arises over whether to perform a standard fertility assessment at an age when, for example, oocyte freezing is still practical and feasible, knowing that the proven predictors in subfertile couples may be less informative, or even inappropriate, in women without complaints about fertility. Studies have demonstrated that if women knew that their fertility was diminishing, they might alter life plans, including having children sooner or considering oocyte preservation. Therefore, we argue that physicians need to make an effort to evaluate a woman's childbearing priorities, though not necessarily their fertility, during the initial family planning visit.

KW - anti-Mullerian hormone

KW - cryopreservation

KW - family planning

KW - oocyte freezing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922432794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922432794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/deu304

DO - 10.1093/humrep/deu304

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 16

EP - 19

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 1

ER -