Psychometric Properties of an Objective Structured Clinical Assessment Tool

Rana Halabi Najjar, Angela Docherty, Nick Miehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Inconsistencies in approaches to clinical teaching and evaluation can lead to significant challenges in the absence of reliable, standardized assessment measures. The purpose of our research was to examine the psychometric properties of a rubric to evaluate students in a simulation testing environment. Method: Two raters used an evaluation rubric to score the performance of 33 students taking part in an objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA). Content validity and inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated. Results: The OSCA as a whole demonstrated excellent content validity and acceptable inter-reliability was obtained on the evaluation rubric. Conclusions: Given the right process, structure, and support, our results indicate that the OSCA is a robust and reliable approach to evaluate student clinical performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-95
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Simulation in Nursing
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
psychometrics
Students
Evaluation
evaluation
student
Evaluate
Teaching
Statistics
Inconsistency
performance
statistics
Testing
Research
simulation
Simulation

Keywords

  • Clinical evaluation
  • Nursing education
  • Objective structured clinical assessments (OSCAs)
  • Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs)
  • Rubrics
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Psychometric Properties of an Objective Structured Clinical Assessment Tool. / Najjar, Rana Halabi; Docherty, Angela; Miehl, Nick.

In: Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 88-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9bb0c5d84db6404b917c084aeddbe716,
title = "Psychometric Properties of an Objective Structured Clinical Assessment Tool",
abstract = "Background: Inconsistencies in approaches to clinical teaching and evaluation can lead to significant challenges in the absence of reliable, standardized assessment measures. The purpose of our research was to examine the psychometric properties of a rubric to evaluate students in a simulation testing environment. Method: Two raters used an evaluation rubric to score the performance of 33 students taking part in an objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA). Content validity and inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated. Results: The OSCA as a whole demonstrated excellent content validity and acceptable inter-reliability was obtained on the evaluation rubric. Conclusions: Given the right process, structure, and support, our results indicate that the OSCA is a robust and reliable approach to evaluate student clinical performance.",
keywords = "Clinical evaluation, Nursing education, Objective structured clinical assessments (OSCAs), Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), Rubrics, Simulation",
author = "Najjar, {Rana Halabi} and Angela Docherty and Nick Miehl",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "88--95",
journal = "Clinical Simulation in Nursing",
issn = "1876-1399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric Properties of an Objective Structured Clinical Assessment Tool

AU - Najjar, Rana Halabi

AU - Docherty, Angela

AU - Miehl, Nick

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background: Inconsistencies in approaches to clinical teaching and evaluation can lead to significant challenges in the absence of reliable, standardized assessment measures. The purpose of our research was to examine the psychometric properties of a rubric to evaluate students in a simulation testing environment. Method: Two raters used an evaluation rubric to score the performance of 33 students taking part in an objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA). Content validity and inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated. Results: The OSCA as a whole demonstrated excellent content validity and acceptable inter-reliability was obtained on the evaluation rubric. Conclusions: Given the right process, structure, and support, our results indicate that the OSCA is a robust and reliable approach to evaluate student clinical performance.

AB - Background: Inconsistencies in approaches to clinical teaching and evaluation can lead to significant challenges in the absence of reliable, standardized assessment measures. The purpose of our research was to examine the psychometric properties of a rubric to evaluate students in a simulation testing environment. Method: Two raters used an evaluation rubric to score the performance of 33 students taking part in an objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA). Content validity and inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated. Results: The OSCA as a whole demonstrated excellent content validity and acceptable inter-reliability was obtained on the evaluation rubric. Conclusions: Given the right process, structure, and support, our results indicate that the OSCA is a robust and reliable approach to evaluate student clinical performance.

KW - Clinical evaluation

KW - Nursing education

KW - Objective structured clinical assessments (OSCAs)

KW - Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs)

KW - Rubrics

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959449241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959449241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959449241

VL - 12

SP - 88

EP - 95

JO - Clinical Simulation in Nursing

JF - Clinical Simulation in Nursing

SN - 1876-1399

IS - 3

ER -