Psychometric Analysis of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale as a Measure of Patient Symptom Perception

Corrine Y. Jurgens, Christopher Lee, Barbara Riegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Symptoms are known to predict survival among patients with heart failure (HF), but discrepancies exist between patients’ and health providers’ perceptions of HF symptom burden. OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study is to quantify the internal consistency, validity, and prognostic value of patient perception of a broad range of HF symptoms using an HF-specific physical symptom measure, the 18-item HF Somatic Perception Scale v. 3. METHODS:: Factor analysis of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was conducted in a convenience sample of 378 patients with chronic HF. Convergent validity was examined using the Physical Limitation subscale of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Divergent validity was examined using the Self-care of HF Index self-care management score. One-year survival based on HF Somatic Perception Scale scores was quantified using Cox regression controlling for Seattle HF Model scores to account for clinical status, therapeutics, and lab values. RESULTS:: The sample was 63% male, 85% white, 67% functionally compromised (New York Heart Association class III–IV) with a mean (SD) age of 63 (12.8) years. Internal consistency of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was α = .90. Convergent (r = −0.54, P <.0001) and divergent (r = 0.18, P > .05) validities were supported. Controlling for Seattle HF scores, HF Somatic Perception Scale was a significant predictor of 1-year survival, with those most symptomatic having worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–1.024; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS:: Perception of HF symptom burden as measured by the HF Somatic Perception Scale is a significant predictor of survival, contributing additional prognostic value over and above objective Seattle HF Risk Model scores. This analysis suggests that assessment of a broad range of HF symptoms, or those related to dyspnea or early and subtle symptoms, may be useful in evaluating therapeutic outcomes and predicting event-free survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Nursing
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 21 2015

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Heart Failure
Self Care
Survival
Cardiomyopathies
Dyspnea
Statistical Factor Analysis
Disease-Free Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Psychometric Analysis of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale as a Measure of Patient Symptom Perception. / Jurgens, Corrine Y.; Lee, Christopher; Riegel, Barbara.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 21.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf428633d7b74c35a66c4a04a1090e17,
title = "Psychometric Analysis of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale as a Measure of Patient Symptom Perception",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Symptoms are known to predict survival among patients with heart failure (HF), but discrepancies exist between patients’ and health providers’ perceptions of HF symptom burden. OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study is to quantify the internal consistency, validity, and prognostic value of patient perception of a broad range of HF symptoms using an HF-specific physical symptom measure, the 18-item HF Somatic Perception Scale v. 3. METHODS:: Factor analysis of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was conducted in a convenience sample of 378 patients with chronic HF. Convergent validity was examined using the Physical Limitation subscale of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Divergent validity was examined using the Self-care of HF Index self-care management score. One-year survival based on HF Somatic Perception Scale scores was quantified using Cox regression controlling for Seattle HF Model scores to account for clinical status, therapeutics, and lab values. RESULTS:: The sample was 63{\%} male, 85{\%} white, 67{\%} functionally compromised (New York Heart Association class III–IV) with a mean (SD) age of 63 (12.8) years. Internal consistency of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was α = .90. Convergent (r = −0.54, P <.0001) and divergent (r = 0.18, P > .05) validities were supported. Controlling for Seattle HF scores, HF Somatic Perception Scale was a significant predictor of 1-year survival, with those most symptomatic having worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.012; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.001–1.024; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS:: Perception of HF symptom burden as measured by the HF Somatic Perception Scale is a significant predictor of survival, contributing additional prognostic value over and above objective Seattle HF Risk Model scores. This analysis suggests that assessment of a broad range of HF symptoms, or those related to dyspnea or early and subtle symptoms, may be useful in evaluating therapeutic outcomes and predicting event-free survival.",
author = "Jurgens, {Corrine Y.} and Christopher Lee and Barbara Riegel",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1097/JCN.0000000000000320",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "0889-4655",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric Analysis of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale as a Measure of Patient Symptom Perception

AU - Jurgens, Corrine Y.

AU - Lee, Christopher

AU - Riegel, Barbara

PY - 2015/12/21

Y1 - 2015/12/21

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Symptoms are known to predict survival among patients with heart failure (HF), but discrepancies exist between patients’ and health providers’ perceptions of HF symptom burden. OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study is to quantify the internal consistency, validity, and prognostic value of patient perception of a broad range of HF symptoms using an HF-specific physical symptom measure, the 18-item HF Somatic Perception Scale v. 3. METHODS:: Factor analysis of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was conducted in a convenience sample of 378 patients with chronic HF. Convergent validity was examined using the Physical Limitation subscale of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Divergent validity was examined using the Self-care of HF Index self-care management score. One-year survival based on HF Somatic Perception Scale scores was quantified using Cox regression controlling for Seattle HF Model scores to account for clinical status, therapeutics, and lab values. RESULTS:: The sample was 63% male, 85% white, 67% functionally compromised (New York Heart Association class III–IV) with a mean (SD) age of 63 (12.8) years. Internal consistency of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was α = .90. Convergent (r = −0.54, P <.0001) and divergent (r = 0.18, P > .05) validities were supported. Controlling for Seattle HF scores, HF Somatic Perception Scale was a significant predictor of 1-year survival, with those most symptomatic having worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–1.024; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS:: Perception of HF symptom burden as measured by the HF Somatic Perception Scale is a significant predictor of survival, contributing additional prognostic value over and above objective Seattle HF Risk Model scores. This analysis suggests that assessment of a broad range of HF symptoms, or those related to dyspnea or early and subtle symptoms, may be useful in evaluating therapeutic outcomes and predicting event-free survival.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Symptoms are known to predict survival among patients with heart failure (HF), but discrepancies exist between patients’ and health providers’ perceptions of HF symptom burden. OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study is to quantify the internal consistency, validity, and prognostic value of patient perception of a broad range of HF symptoms using an HF-specific physical symptom measure, the 18-item HF Somatic Perception Scale v. 3. METHODS:: Factor analysis of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was conducted in a convenience sample of 378 patients with chronic HF. Convergent validity was examined using the Physical Limitation subscale of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Divergent validity was examined using the Self-care of HF Index self-care management score. One-year survival based on HF Somatic Perception Scale scores was quantified using Cox regression controlling for Seattle HF Model scores to account for clinical status, therapeutics, and lab values. RESULTS:: The sample was 63% male, 85% white, 67% functionally compromised (New York Heart Association class III–IV) with a mean (SD) age of 63 (12.8) years. Internal consistency of the HF Somatic Perception Scale was α = .90. Convergent (r = −0.54, P <.0001) and divergent (r = 0.18, P > .05) validities were supported. Controlling for Seattle HF scores, HF Somatic Perception Scale was a significant predictor of 1-year survival, with those most symptomatic having worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–1.024; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS:: Perception of HF symptom burden as measured by the HF Somatic Perception Scale is a significant predictor of survival, contributing additional prognostic value over and above objective Seattle HF Risk Model scores. This analysis suggests that assessment of a broad range of HF symptoms, or those related to dyspnea or early and subtle symptoms, may be useful in evaluating therapeutic outcomes and predicting event-free survival.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951310624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951310624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000320

DO - 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000320

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 0889-4655

ER -