Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy

David Bangsberg, Frederick M. Hecht, Heather Clague, Edwin D. Charlebois, Dan Ciccarone, Margaret Chesney, Andrew Moss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Adherence assessment is an essential component of monitoring HIV antiretroviral therapy. Prior studies suggest that medical providers frequently estimate individual patient adherence inaccurately. Objective: We compared provider estimates of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy with unannounced pill counts and structured patient interviews to determine the accuracy of adherence information obtained by providers and patients. Design, setting, and participants: Comparison of three adherence measures in homeless or marginally housed persons receiving HIV antiretroviral therapy (n = 45) and their providers (n = 35). Measurements: Provider estimate of percentage of pills taken; three successive patient structured reports of number of doses missed in the last 3 days; and three successive unannounced pill counts. Results: 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-22%) of patients were not following their regimen as directed. Provider-adherence estimate explained only 26% (95% CI, 6%-47%) of the variation in pill count adherence, whereas patient report explained 72% (95% CI, 52%-96%). The sensitivity and specificity of provider estimates of nonadherence, defined as <80% of pills taken by pill count, were 40% and 85%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of patient interview were 72% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: Provider estimate of adherence was inaccurate whereas structured patient report was more closely related to pill count. Structured assessment over several short intervals may improve accuracy of adherence assessment in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-442
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume26
Issue number5
StatePublished - Apr 15 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

HIV
Confidence Intervals
Patient Compliance
Therapeutics
Interviews
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Drug use
  • Health care provider
  • Highly active antiretroviral therapy
  • HIV
  • Homeless
  • Pill count
  • Self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Virology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Bangsberg, D., Hecht, F. M., Clague, H., Charlebois, E. D., Ciccarone, D., Chesney, M., & Moss, A. (2001). Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 26(5), 435-442.

Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. / Bangsberg, David; Hecht, Frederick M.; Clague, Heather; Charlebois, Edwin D.; Ciccarone, Dan; Chesney, Margaret; Moss, Andrew.

In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol. 26, No. 5, 15.04.2001, p. 435-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bangsberg, D, Hecht, FM, Clague, H, Charlebois, ED, Ciccarone, D, Chesney, M & Moss, A 2001, 'Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy', Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 435-442.
Bangsberg D, Hecht FM, Clague H, Charlebois ED, Ciccarone D, Chesney M et al. Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2001 Apr 15;26(5):435-442.
Bangsberg, David ; Hecht, Frederick M. ; Clague, Heather ; Charlebois, Edwin D. ; Ciccarone, Dan ; Chesney, Margaret ; Moss, Andrew. / Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2001 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 435-442.
@article{d589d7e934074525905eeefe039f686b,
title = "Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy",
abstract = "Background: Adherence assessment is an essential component of monitoring HIV antiretroviral therapy. Prior studies suggest that medical providers frequently estimate individual patient adherence inaccurately. Objective: We compared provider estimates of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy with unannounced pill counts and structured patient interviews to determine the accuracy of adherence information obtained by providers and patients. Design, setting, and participants: Comparison of three adherence measures in homeless or marginally housed persons receiving HIV antiretroviral therapy (n = 45) and their providers (n = 35). Measurements: Provider estimate of percentage of pills taken; three successive patient structured reports of number of doses missed in the last 3 days; and three successive unannounced pill counts. Results: 13{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 4{\%}-22{\%}) of patients were not following their regimen as directed. Provider-adherence estimate explained only 26{\%} (95{\%} CI, 6{\%}-47{\%}) of the variation in pill count adherence, whereas patient report explained 72{\%} (95{\%} CI, 52{\%}-96{\%}). The sensitivity and specificity of provider estimates of nonadherence, defined as <80{\%} of pills taken by pill count, were 40{\%} and 85{\%}, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of patient interview were 72{\%} and 95{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: Provider estimate of adherence was inaccurate whereas structured patient report was more closely related to pill count. Structured assessment over several short intervals may improve accuracy of adherence assessment in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Adherence, Drug use, Health care provider, Highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV, Homeless, Pill count, Self-report",
author = "David Bangsberg and Hecht, {Frederick M.} and Heather Clague and Charlebois, {Edwin D.} and Dan Ciccarone and Margaret Chesney and Andrew Moss",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "435--442",
journal = "Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes",
issn = "1525-4135",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy

AU - Bangsberg, David

AU - Hecht, Frederick M.

AU - Clague, Heather

AU - Charlebois, Edwin D.

AU - Ciccarone, Dan

AU - Chesney, Margaret

AU - Moss, Andrew

PY - 2001/4/15

Y1 - 2001/4/15

N2 - Background: Adherence assessment is an essential component of monitoring HIV antiretroviral therapy. Prior studies suggest that medical providers frequently estimate individual patient adherence inaccurately. Objective: We compared provider estimates of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy with unannounced pill counts and structured patient interviews to determine the accuracy of adherence information obtained by providers and patients. Design, setting, and participants: Comparison of three adherence measures in homeless or marginally housed persons receiving HIV antiretroviral therapy (n = 45) and their providers (n = 35). Measurements: Provider estimate of percentage of pills taken; three successive patient structured reports of number of doses missed in the last 3 days; and three successive unannounced pill counts. Results: 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-22%) of patients were not following their regimen as directed. Provider-adherence estimate explained only 26% (95% CI, 6%-47%) of the variation in pill count adherence, whereas patient report explained 72% (95% CI, 52%-96%). The sensitivity and specificity of provider estimates of nonadherence, defined as <80% of pills taken by pill count, were 40% and 85%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of patient interview were 72% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: Provider estimate of adherence was inaccurate whereas structured patient report was more closely related to pill count. Structured assessment over several short intervals may improve accuracy of adherence assessment in clinical practice.

AB - Background: Adherence assessment is an essential component of monitoring HIV antiretroviral therapy. Prior studies suggest that medical providers frequently estimate individual patient adherence inaccurately. Objective: We compared provider estimates of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy with unannounced pill counts and structured patient interviews to determine the accuracy of adherence information obtained by providers and patients. Design, setting, and participants: Comparison of three adherence measures in homeless or marginally housed persons receiving HIV antiretroviral therapy (n = 45) and their providers (n = 35). Measurements: Provider estimate of percentage of pills taken; three successive patient structured reports of number of doses missed in the last 3 days; and three successive unannounced pill counts. Results: 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-22%) of patients were not following their regimen as directed. Provider-adherence estimate explained only 26% (95% CI, 6%-47%) of the variation in pill count adherence, whereas patient report explained 72% (95% CI, 52%-96%). The sensitivity and specificity of provider estimates of nonadherence, defined as <80% of pills taken by pill count, were 40% and 85%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of patient interview were 72% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: Provider estimate of adherence was inaccurate whereas structured patient report was more closely related to pill count. Structured assessment over several short intervals may improve accuracy of adherence assessment in clinical practice.

KW - Adherence

KW - Drug use

KW - Health care provider

KW - Highly active antiretroviral therapy

KW - HIV

KW - Homeless

KW - Pill count

KW - Self-report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035870745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035870745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 435

EP - 442

JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

SN - 1525-4135

IS - 5

ER -