Prostate cancer and computer models

Background, limitations, and potential

Ruth Etzioni, Ian M. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A review of the past five years finds four efforts to model decisions regarding localized prostate cancer. Sequentially, each model is described and evaluated in terms of its strengths and weaknesses. We found that all models of localized prostate cancer decision making suffer from a number of problems, most notably due to a previously noted lack of unbiased data concerning the natural history of the disease but also due to flaws in the design of the models and the use of available data. Despite the problems with the conclusions of computer models developed thus far, major strides have been made. Emphasis must be placed on obtaining better data to use in these models and on improving the models' logical structure so as to make better use of the available data. Computer models augment but do not replace randomized clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-64
Number of pages8
JournalUrologic Oncology
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computer Simulation
Prostatic Neoplasms
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Urology

Cite this

Prostate cancer and computer models : Background, limitations, and potential. / Etzioni, Ruth; Thompson, Ian M.

In: Urologic Oncology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.01.1996, p. 57-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Etzioni, Ruth ; Thompson, Ian M. / Prostate cancer and computer models : Background, limitations, and potential. In: Urologic Oncology. 1996 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 57-64.
@article{47fc1c7aa6a3417e88d83f7c74d3236d,
title = "Prostate cancer and computer models: Background, limitations, and potential",
abstract = "A review of the past five years finds four efforts to model decisions regarding localized prostate cancer. Sequentially, each model is described and evaluated in terms of its strengths and weaknesses. We found that all models of localized prostate cancer decision making suffer from a number of problems, most notably due to a previously noted lack of unbiased data concerning the natural history of the disease but also due to flaws in the design of the models and the use of available data. Despite the problems with the conclusions of computer models developed thus far, major strides have been made. Emphasis must be placed on obtaining better data to use in these models and on improving the models' logical structure so as to make better use of the available data. Computer models augment but do not replace randomized clinical trials.",
author = "Ruth Etzioni and Thompson, {Ian M.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1078-1439(96)00047-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "57--64",
journal = "Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations",
issn = "1078-1439",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prostate cancer and computer models

T2 - Background, limitations, and potential

AU - Etzioni, Ruth

AU - Thompson, Ian M.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - A review of the past five years finds four efforts to model decisions regarding localized prostate cancer. Sequentially, each model is described and evaluated in terms of its strengths and weaknesses. We found that all models of localized prostate cancer decision making suffer from a number of problems, most notably due to a previously noted lack of unbiased data concerning the natural history of the disease but also due to flaws in the design of the models and the use of available data. Despite the problems with the conclusions of computer models developed thus far, major strides have been made. Emphasis must be placed on obtaining better data to use in these models and on improving the models' logical structure so as to make better use of the available data. Computer models augment but do not replace randomized clinical trials.

AB - A review of the past five years finds four efforts to model decisions regarding localized prostate cancer. Sequentially, each model is described and evaluated in terms of its strengths and weaknesses. We found that all models of localized prostate cancer decision making suffer from a number of problems, most notably due to a previously noted lack of unbiased data concerning the natural history of the disease but also due to flaws in the design of the models and the use of available data. Despite the problems with the conclusions of computer models developed thus far, major strides have been made. Emphasis must be placed on obtaining better data to use in these models and on improving the models' logical structure so as to make better use of the available data. Computer models augment but do not replace randomized clinical trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030110799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030110799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1078-1439(96)00047-6

DO - 10.1016/S1078-1439(96)00047-6

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 57

EP - 64

JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

SN - 1078-1439

IS - 2

ER -