Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particles therapy

Timur Mitin, Anthony L. Zietman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proton beam therapy, the most common form of heavy-particle radiation therapy, is not a new invention, but it has gained considerable public attention because of the high cost of installing and operating the rapidly increasing number of treatment centers. This article reviews the physical properties of proton beam therapy and focuses on the up-to-date clinical evidence comparing proton beam therapy with the more standard and widely available radiation therapy treatment alternatives. In a cost-conscious era of health care, the hypothetical benefits of proton beam therapy will have to be supported by demonstrable clinical gains. Proton beam therapy represents, through its scale and its cost, a battleground for the policy debate around managing expensive technology in modern medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2855-2863
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 10 2014

Fingerprint

Proton Therapy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Modern 1601-history
Technology
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particles therapy. / Mitin, Timur; Zietman, Anthony L.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, No. 26, 10.09.2014, p. 2855-2863.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitin, Timur ; Zietman, Anthony L. / Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particles therapy. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014 ; No. 26. pp. 2855-2863.
@article{b3f310cec0744529911599891961ca29,
title = "Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particles therapy",
abstract = "Proton beam therapy, the most common form of heavy-particle radiation therapy, is not a new invention, but it has gained considerable public attention because of the high cost of installing and operating the rapidly increasing number of treatment centers. This article reviews the physical properties of proton beam therapy and focuses on the up-to-date clinical evidence comparing proton beam therapy with the more standard and widely available radiation therapy treatment alternatives. In a cost-conscious era of health care, the hypothetical benefits of proton beam therapy will have to be supported by demonstrable clinical gains. Proton beam therapy represents, through its scale and its cost, a battleground for the policy debate around managing expensive technology in modern medicine.",
author = "Timur Mitin and Zietman, {Anthony L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1945",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "2855--2863",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "26",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particles therapy

AU - Mitin, Timur

AU - Zietman, Anthony L.

PY - 2014/9/10

Y1 - 2014/9/10

N2 - Proton beam therapy, the most common form of heavy-particle radiation therapy, is not a new invention, but it has gained considerable public attention because of the high cost of installing and operating the rapidly increasing number of treatment centers. This article reviews the physical properties of proton beam therapy and focuses on the up-to-date clinical evidence comparing proton beam therapy with the more standard and widely available radiation therapy treatment alternatives. In a cost-conscious era of health care, the hypothetical benefits of proton beam therapy will have to be supported by demonstrable clinical gains. Proton beam therapy represents, through its scale and its cost, a battleground for the policy debate around managing expensive technology in modern medicine.

AB - Proton beam therapy, the most common form of heavy-particle radiation therapy, is not a new invention, but it has gained considerable public attention because of the high cost of installing and operating the rapidly increasing number of treatment centers. This article reviews the physical properties of proton beam therapy and focuses on the up-to-date clinical evidence comparing proton beam therapy with the more standard and widely available radiation therapy treatment alternatives. In a cost-conscious era of health care, the hypothetical benefits of proton beam therapy will have to be supported by demonstrable clinical gains. Proton beam therapy represents, through its scale and its cost, a battleground for the policy debate around managing expensive technology in modern medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907010602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907010602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1945

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1945

M3 - Article

C2 - 25113772

AN - SCOPUS:84907010602

SP - 2855

EP - 2863

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 26

ER -