Prohibiting consent: What are the costs of denying permanent contraception concurrent with abortion care?

Jamie W. Krashin, Alison B. Edelman, Mark D. Nichols, Allison J. Allen, Aaron B. Caughey, Maria I. Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective Oregon and federal laws prohibit giving informed consent for permanent contraception when presenting for an abortion. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the number of unintended pregnancies associated with this barrier to obtaining concurrent tubal occlusion and abortion, compared with the current policy, which limits women to obtaining interval tubal occlusion after abortion. The secondary objectives were to compare the financial costs, quality-Adjusted life years, and the cost-effectiveness of these policies. Study Design We designed a decision-Analytic model examining a theoretical population of women who requested tubal occlusion at time of abortion. Model inputs came from the literature. We examined the primary and secondary outcomes stratified by maternal age (>30 and <30 years). A Markov model incorporated the possibility of multiple pregnancies. Sensitivity analyses were performed on all variables and a Monte Carlo simulation was conducted. Results For every 1000 women age <30 years in Oregon who did not receive requested tubal occlusion at the time of abortion, over 5 years there would be 1274 additional unintended pregnancies and an additional $4,152,373 in direct medical costs. Allowing women to receive tubal occlusion at time of abortion was the dominant strategy. It resulted in both lower costs and greater quality-Adjusted life years compared to allowing only interval tubal occlusion after abortion. Conclusion Prohibiting tubal occlusion at time of abortion resulted in an increased incidence of unintended pregnancy and increased public costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76.e1-76.e10
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume211
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • abortion
  • consent
  • cost-effectiveness
  • female sterilization
  • permanent contraception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prohibiting consent: What are the costs of denying permanent contraception concurrent with abortion care?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this