Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement

Deborah Cohen, David Dorr, Kyle Knierim, C. Annette DuBard, Jennifer R. Hemler, Jennifer D. Hall, Miguel Marino, Leif I. Solberg, Kenneth (John) McConnell, Len M. Nichols, Donald E. Nease, Samuel Edwards, Winfred Y. Wu, Hang Pham-Singer, Abel N. Kho, Robert L. Phillips, Luke V. Rasmussen, F. Daniel Duffy, Bijal A. Balasubramanian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Federal value-based payment programs require primary care practices to conduct quality improvement activities, informed by the electronic reports on clinical quality measures that their electronic health records (EHRs) generate. To determine whether EHRs produce reports adequate to the task, we examined survey responses from 1,492 practices across twelve states, supplemented with qualitative data. Meaningful-use participation, which requires the use of a federally certified EHR, was associated with the ability to generate reports-but the reports did not necessarily support quality improvement initiatives. Practices reported numerous challenges in generating adequate reports, such as difficulty manipulating and aligning measurement time frames with quality improvement needs, lack of functionality for generating reports on electronic clinical quality measures at different levels, discordance between clinical guidelines and measures available in reports, questionable data quality, and vendors that were unreceptive to changing EHR configuration beyond federal requirements. The current state of EHR measurement functionality may be insufficient to support federal initiatives that tie payment to clinical quality measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-643
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Quality Improvement
Primary Health Care
Data Accuracy
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement. / Cohen, Deborah; Dorr, David; Knierim, Kyle; DuBard, C. Annette; Hemler, Jennifer R.; Hall, Jennifer D.; Marino, Miguel; Solberg, Leif I.; McConnell, Kenneth (John); Nichols, Len M.; Nease, Donald E.; Edwards, Samuel; Wu, Winfred Y.; Pham-Singer, Hang; Kho, Abel N.; Phillips, Robert L.; Rasmussen, Luke V.; Duffy, F. Daniel; Balasubramanian, Bijal A.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 635-643.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, D, Dorr, D, Knierim, K, DuBard, CA, Hemler, JR, Hall, JD, Marino, M, Solberg, LI, McConnell, KJ, Nichols, LM, Nease, DE, Edwards, S, Wu, WY, Pham-Singer, H, Kho, AN, Phillips, RL, Rasmussen, LV, Duffy, FD & Balasubramanian, BA 2018, 'Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement', Health Affairs, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 635-643. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254
Cohen, Deborah ; Dorr, David ; Knierim, Kyle ; DuBard, C. Annette ; Hemler, Jennifer R. ; Hall, Jennifer D. ; Marino, Miguel ; Solberg, Leif I. ; McConnell, Kenneth (John) ; Nichols, Len M. ; Nease, Donald E. ; Edwards, Samuel ; Wu, Winfred Y. ; Pham-Singer, Hang ; Kho, Abel N. ; Phillips, Robert L. ; Rasmussen, Luke V. ; Duffy, F. Daniel ; Balasubramanian, Bijal A. / Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement. In: Health Affairs. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 635-643.
@article{5427a4c5cb1a44e68302cc64cbc5e7b9,
title = "Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement",
abstract = "Federal value-based payment programs require primary care practices to conduct quality improvement activities, informed by the electronic reports on clinical quality measures that their electronic health records (EHRs) generate. To determine whether EHRs produce reports adequate to the task, we examined survey responses from 1,492 practices across twelve states, supplemented with qualitative data. Meaningful-use participation, which requires the use of a federally certified EHR, was associated with the ability to generate reports-but the reports did not necessarily support quality improvement initiatives. Practices reported numerous challenges in generating adequate reports, such as difficulty manipulating and aligning measurement time frames with quality improvement needs, lack of functionality for generating reports on electronic clinical quality measures at different levels, discordance between clinical guidelines and measures available in reports, questionable data quality, and vendors that were unreceptive to changing EHR configuration beyond federal requirements. The current state of EHR measurement functionality may be insufficient to support federal initiatives that tie payment to clinical quality measures.",
author = "Deborah Cohen and David Dorr and Kyle Knierim and DuBard, {C. Annette} and Hemler, {Jennifer R.} and Hall, {Jennifer D.} and Miguel Marino and Solberg, {Leif I.} and McConnell, {Kenneth (John)} and Nichols, {Len M.} and Nease, {Donald E.} and Samuel Edwards and Wu, {Winfred Y.} and Hang Pham-Singer and Kho, {Abel N.} and Phillips, {Robert L.} and Rasmussen, {Luke V.} and Duffy, {F. Daniel} and Balasubramanian, {Bijal A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "635--643",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement

AU - Cohen, Deborah

AU - Dorr, David

AU - Knierim, Kyle

AU - DuBard, C. Annette

AU - Hemler, Jennifer R.

AU - Hall, Jennifer D.

AU - Marino, Miguel

AU - Solberg, Leif I.

AU - McConnell, Kenneth (John)

AU - Nichols, Len M.

AU - Nease, Donald E.

AU - Edwards, Samuel

AU - Wu, Winfred Y.

AU - Pham-Singer, Hang

AU - Kho, Abel N.

AU - Phillips, Robert L.

AU - Rasmussen, Luke V.

AU - Duffy, F. Daniel

AU - Balasubramanian, Bijal A.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Federal value-based payment programs require primary care practices to conduct quality improvement activities, informed by the electronic reports on clinical quality measures that their electronic health records (EHRs) generate. To determine whether EHRs produce reports adequate to the task, we examined survey responses from 1,492 practices across twelve states, supplemented with qualitative data. Meaningful-use participation, which requires the use of a federally certified EHR, was associated with the ability to generate reports-but the reports did not necessarily support quality improvement initiatives. Practices reported numerous challenges in generating adequate reports, such as difficulty manipulating and aligning measurement time frames with quality improvement needs, lack of functionality for generating reports on electronic clinical quality measures at different levels, discordance between clinical guidelines and measures available in reports, questionable data quality, and vendors that were unreceptive to changing EHR configuration beyond federal requirements. The current state of EHR measurement functionality may be insufficient to support federal initiatives that tie payment to clinical quality measures.

AB - Federal value-based payment programs require primary care practices to conduct quality improvement activities, informed by the electronic reports on clinical quality measures that their electronic health records (EHRs) generate. To determine whether EHRs produce reports adequate to the task, we examined survey responses from 1,492 practices across twelve states, supplemented with qualitative data. Meaningful-use participation, which requires the use of a federally certified EHR, was associated with the ability to generate reports-but the reports did not necessarily support quality improvement initiatives. Practices reported numerous challenges in generating adequate reports, such as difficulty manipulating and aligning measurement time frames with quality improvement needs, lack of functionality for generating reports on electronic clinical quality measures at different levels, discordance between clinical guidelines and measures available in reports, questionable data quality, and vendors that were unreceptive to changing EHR configuration beyond federal requirements. The current state of EHR measurement functionality may be insufficient to support federal initiatives that tie payment to clinical quality measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046718074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046718074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254

M3 - Article

C2 - 29608365

AN - SCOPUS:85046718074

VL - 37

SP - 635

EP - 643

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 4

ER -