Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: A time-motion study

Lisa Pizziferri, Anne F. Kittler, Lynn A. Volk, Melissa M. Honour, Sameer Gupta, Samuel Wang, Tiffany Wang, Margaret Lippincott, Qi Li, David W. Bates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite benefits associated with the use of electronic health records (EHRs), one major barrier to adoption is the concern that EHRs may take longer for physicians to use than paper-based systems. To address this issue, we performed a time-motion study in five primary care clinics. Twenty physicians were observed and specific activities were timed during a clinic session before and after EHR implementation. Surveys evaluated physicians' perceptions regarding the EHR. Post-implementation, the adjusted mean overall time spent per patient during clinic sessions decreased by 0.5 min (p = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [-5.05, 6.04]) from a pre-intervention adjusted average of 27.55 min (SE = 2.1) to a post-intervention adjusted average of 27.05 min (SE = 1.6). A majority of survey respondents believed EHR use results in quality improvement, yet only 29% reported that EHR documentation takes the same amount of time or less compared to the paper-based system. While the EHR did not require more time for physicians during a clinic session, further studies should assess the EHR's potential impact on non-clinic time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-188
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Time and Motion Studies
Electronic Health Records
Primary Care Physicians
Health
Physicians
Quality Improvement
Documentation
Primary Health Care
Confidence Intervals
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Electronic health record
  • Physician satisfaction
  • Physician workload
  • Time-motion study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Catalysis

Cite this

Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record : A time-motion study. / Pizziferri, Lisa; Kittler, Anne F.; Volk, Lynn A.; Honour, Melissa M.; Gupta, Sameer; Wang, Samuel; Wang, Tiffany; Lippincott, Margaret; Li, Qi; Bates, David W.

In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 176-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pizziferri, L, Kittler, AF, Volk, LA, Honour, MM, Gupta, S, Wang, S, Wang, T, Lippincott, M, Li, Q & Bates, DW 2005, 'Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: A time-motion study', Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009
Pizziferri, Lisa ; Kittler, Anne F. ; Volk, Lynn A. ; Honour, Melissa M. ; Gupta, Sameer ; Wang, Samuel ; Wang, Tiffany ; Lippincott, Margaret ; Li, Qi ; Bates, David W. / Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record : A time-motion study. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2005 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 176-188.
@article{2e8cc0bec80640a9a8047c517b70a425,
title = "Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: A time-motion study",
abstract = "Despite benefits associated with the use of electronic health records (EHRs), one major barrier to adoption is the concern that EHRs may take longer for physicians to use than paper-based systems. To address this issue, we performed a time-motion study in five primary care clinics. Twenty physicians were observed and specific activities were timed during a clinic session before and after EHR implementation. Surveys evaluated physicians' perceptions regarding the EHR. Post-implementation, the adjusted mean overall time spent per patient during clinic sessions decreased by 0.5 min (p = 0.86; 95{\%} confidence interval [-5.05, 6.04]) from a pre-intervention adjusted average of 27.55 min (SE = 2.1) to a post-intervention adjusted average of 27.05 min (SE = 1.6). A majority of survey respondents believed EHR use results in quality improvement, yet only 29{\%} reported that EHR documentation takes the same amount of time or less compared to the paper-based system. While the EHR did not require more time for physicians during a clinic session, further studies should assess the EHR's potential impact on non-clinic time.",
keywords = "Electronic health record, Physician satisfaction, Physician workload, Time-motion study",
author = "Lisa Pizziferri and Kittler, {Anne F.} and Volk, {Lynn A.} and Honour, {Melissa M.} and Sameer Gupta and Samuel Wang and Tiffany Wang and Margaret Lippincott and Qi Li and Bates, {David W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "176--188",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Informatics",
issn = "1532-0464",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record

T2 - A time-motion study

AU - Pizziferri, Lisa

AU - Kittler, Anne F.

AU - Volk, Lynn A.

AU - Honour, Melissa M.

AU - Gupta, Sameer

AU - Wang, Samuel

AU - Wang, Tiffany

AU - Lippincott, Margaret

AU - Li, Qi

AU - Bates, David W.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Despite benefits associated with the use of electronic health records (EHRs), one major barrier to adoption is the concern that EHRs may take longer for physicians to use than paper-based systems. To address this issue, we performed a time-motion study in five primary care clinics. Twenty physicians were observed and specific activities were timed during a clinic session before and after EHR implementation. Surveys evaluated physicians' perceptions regarding the EHR. Post-implementation, the adjusted mean overall time spent per patient during clinic sessions decreased by 0.5 min (p = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [-5.05, 6.04]) from a pre-intervention adjusted average of 27.55 min (SE = 2.1) to a post-intervention adjusted average of 27.05 min (SE = 1.6). A majority of survey respondents believed EHR use results in quality improvement, yet only 29% reported that EHR documentation takes the same amount of time or less compared to the paper-based system. While the EHR did not require more time for physicians during a clinic session, further studies should assess the EHR's potential impact on non-clinic time.

AB - Despite benefits associated with the use of electronic health records (EHRs), one major barrier to adoption is the concern that EHRs may take longer for physicians to use than paper-based systems. To address this issue, we performed a time-motion study in five primary care clinics. Twenty physicians were observed and specific activities were timed during a clinic session before and after EHR implementation. Surveys evaluated physicians' perceptions regarding the EHR. Post-implementation, the adjusted mean overall time spent per patient during clinic sessions decreased by 0.5 min (p = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [-5.05, 6.04]) from a pre-intervention adjusted average of 27.55 min (SE = 2.1) to a post-intervention adjusted average of 27.05 min (SE = 1.6). A majority of survey respondents believed EHR use results in quality improvement, yet only 29% reported that EHR documentation takes the same amount of time or less compared to the paper-based system. While the EHR did not require more time for physicians during a clinic session, further studies should assess the EHR's potential impact on non-clinic time.

KW - Electronic health record

KW - Physician satisfaction

KW - Physician workload

KW - Time-motion study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18044390760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18044390760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 15896691

AN - SCOPUS:18044390760

VL - 38

SP - 176

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

SN - 1532-0464

IS - 3

ER -