Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly

Stuart E. Sheifer, Bernard J. Gersh, Norbert Yanez, Philip A. Ades, Gregory L. Burke, Teri A. Manolio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

137 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), as well as risk factors, and to compare prognosis after detection of previously UMI to that after recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). BACKGROUND: Past studies revealed that a significant proportion of MIs escape recognition, and that prognosis after such events is poor, but the epidemiology of UMI has not been reassessed in the contemporary era. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) database, composed of individuals ≥65, was queried for participants who, at entry, demonstrated electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis. The features and outcomes of this group were compared to those of individuals with prevalent RMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 participants, 901 evidenced a past MI, and 201 (22.3%) were previously unrecognized. The independent predictors of UMI were the absence of angina and the absence of congestive heart failure (CHF). Six-year mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In the elderly, UMI continues to represent a significant proportion of all MIs; 2) associations with angina and CHF may reflect complex neurological issues, but they also may represent diagnosis bias; 3) these individuals can otherwise not be distinguished from those with recognized infarctions; and 4) mortality rates after UMI and RMI are similar. Future studies should address screening for UMI, risk stratification after detection of previously UMI, and the role of standard post-MI therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-126
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Causality
Myocardial Infarction
Heart Failure
Mortality
Infarction
Epidemiology
Databases
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly. / Sheifer, Stuart E.; Gersh, Bernard J.; Yanez, Norbert; Ades, Philip A.; Burke, Gregory L.; Manolio, Teri A.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 119-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheifer, Stuart E. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Yanez, Norbert ; Ades, Philip A. ; Burke, Gregory L. ; Manolio, Teri A. / Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 119-126.
@article{37be581ab08d46e493b6a8c6ae011be9,
title = "Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), as well as risk factors, and to compare prognosis after detection of previously UMI to that after recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). BACKGROUND: Past studies revealed that a significant proportion of MIs escape recognition, and that prognosis after such events is poor, but the epidemiology of UMI has not been reassessed in the contemporary era. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) database, composed of individuals ≥65, was queried for participants who, at entry, demonstrated electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis. The features and outcomes of this group were compared to those of individuals with prevalent RMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 participants, 901 evidenced a past MI, and 201 (22.3{\%}) were previously unrecognized. The independent predictors of UMI were the absence of angina and the absence of congestive heart failure (CHF). Six-year mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In the elderly, UMI continues to represent a significant proportion of all MIs; 2) associations with angina and CHF may reflect complex neurological issues, but they also may represent diagnosis bias; 3) these individuals can otherwise not be distinguished from those with recognized infarctions; and 4) mortality rates after UMI and RMI are similar. Future studies should address screening for UMI, risk stratification after detection of previously UMI, and the role of standard post-MI therapies.",
author = "Sheifer, {Stuart E.} and Gersh, {Bernard J.} and Norbert Yanez and Ades, {Philip A.} and Burke, {Gregory L.} and Manolio, {Teri A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00524-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "119--126",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly

AU - Sheifer, Stuart E.

AU - Gersh, Bernard J.

AU - Yanez, Norbert

AU - Ades, Philip A.

AU - Burke, Gregory L.

AU - Manolio, Teri A.

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), as well as risk factors, and to compare prognosis after detection of previously UMI to that after recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). BACKGROUND: Past studies revealed that a significant proportion of MIs escape recognition, and that prognosis after such events is poor, but the epidemiology of UMI has not been reassessed in the contemporary era. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) database, composed of individuals ≥65, was queried for participants who, at entry, demonstrated electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis. The features and outcomes of this group were compared to those of individuals with prevalent RMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 participants, 901 evidenced a past MI, and 201 (22.3%) were previously unrecognized. The independent predictors of UMI were the absence of angina and the absence of congestive heart failure (CHF). Six-year mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In the elderly, UMI continues to represent a significant proportion of all MIs; 2) associations with angina and CHF may reflect complex neurological issues, but they also may represent diagnosis bias; 3) these individuals can otherwise not be distinguished from those with recognized infarctions; and 4) mortality rates after UMI and RMI are similar. Future studies should address screening for UMI, risk stratification after detection of previously UMI, and the role of standard post-MI therapies.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), as well as risk factors, and to compare prognosis after detection of previously UMI to that after recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). BACKGROUND: Past studies revealed that a significant proportion of MIs escape recognition, and that prognosis after such events is poor, but the epidemiology of UMI has not been reassessed in the contemporary era. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) database, composed of individuals ≥65, was queried for participants who, at entry, demonstrated electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis. The features and outcomes of this group were compared to those of individuals with prevalent RMI. RESULTS: Of 5,888 participants, 901 evidenced a past MI, and 201 (22.3%) were previously unrecognized. The independent predictors of UMI were the absence of angina and the absence of congestive heart failure (CHF). Six-year mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In the elderly, UMI continues to represent a significant proportion of all MIs; 2) associations with angina and CHF may reflect complex neurological issues, but they also may represent diagnosis bias; 3) these individuals can otherwise not be distinguished from those with recognized infarctions; and 4) mortality rates after UMI and RMI are similar. Future studies should address screening for UMI, risk stratification after detection of previously UMI, and the role of standard post-MI therapies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033966971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033966971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00524-0

DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00524-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 10636269

AN - SCOPUS:0033966971

VL - 35

SP - 119

EP - 126

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 1

ER -