Prevalence of gold sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations

Robin M. Schaffran, Frances Storrs, Peter Schalock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations is often unclear. Knowledge of the prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with and without gold dental restorations is required to better understand the relevance of these reactions. Objective: To determine the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to gold in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations (gold patients) compared with similar individuals without gold dental appliances (nongold patients). Methods: One hundred thirty-six healthy, asymptomatic patients were patch tested to gold sodium thiosulfate, nickel sulfate and palladium chloride. Readings occurred after 2 days and 7 days. Results: Of the patients tested, 24 of 71 (33.8%) gold patients had a positive reaction to gold versus 7 of 65 (10.8%) of the nongold patients, P <.001. Of those with a positive gold reaction, 12 of 31 (38.7%) also had a positive nickel reaction. Nickel alone was positive in 18 of 71 (25.4%) of gold patients versus 11 of 65 (16.9%) of nongold patients. 19 of 29 (65.5%) of those with a positive nickel reaction also reacted to palladium and 19 of 22 (86.4%) of those with a palladium reaction also reacted to nickel. The rate of allergy to gold computed over a 3-year period for patients patch tested in the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Contact Dermatitis Clinic was 13.5% (46/342). Conclusions: The prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with gold dental restorations is approximately 33.8%. This is significantly greater than the 10.8% prevalence seen in individuals without gold dental appliances, as well as greater than the 3-year rate from the OHSU Contact Dermatitis Clinic. This data should help shed light on issues of clinical relevance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-206
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Contact Dermatitis
Volume10
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1999

Fingerprint

Gold
Tooth
Nickel
Gold Sodium Thiosulfate
Patch Tests
Contact Dermatitis
Palladium
Health
Reading
Hypersensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Prevalence of gold sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations. / Schaffran, Robin M.; Storrs, Frances; Schalock, Peter.

In: American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, Vol. 10, No. 4, 12.1999, p. 201-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88a0709f5c1140e7b82230d43d429a74,
title = "Prevalence of gold sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations",
abstract = "Background: The clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations is often unclear. Knowledge of the prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with and without gold dental restorations is required to better understand the relevance of these reactions. Objective: To determine the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to gold in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations (gold patients) compared with similar individuals without gold dental appliances (nongold patients). Methods: One hundred thirty-six healthy, asymptomatic patients were patch tested to gold sodium thiosulfate, nickel sulfate and palladium chloride. Readings occurred after 2 days and 7 days. Results: Of the patients tested, 24 of 71 (33.8{\%}) gold patients had a positive reaction to gold versus 7 of 65 (10.8{\%}) of the nongold patients, P <.001. Of those with a positive gold reaction, 12 of 31 (38.7{\%}) also had a positive nickel reaction. Nickel alone was positive in 18 of 71 (25.4{\%}) of gold patients versus 11 of 65 (16.9{\%}) of nongold patients. 19 of 29 (65.5{\%}) of those with a positive nickel reaction also reacted to palladium and 19 of 22 (86.4{\%}) of those with a palladium reaction also reacted to nickel. The rate of allergy to gold computed over a 3-year period for patients patch tested in the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Contact Dermatitis Clinic was 13.5{\%} (46/342). Conclusions: The prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with gold dental restorations is approximately 33.8{\%}. This is significantly greater than the 10.8{\%} prevalence seen in individuals without gold dental appliances, as well as greater than the 3-year rate from the OHSU Contact Dermatitis Clinic. This data should help shed light on issues of clinical relevance.",
author = "Schaffran, {Robin M.} and Frances Storrs and Peter Schalock",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "201--206",
journal = "Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug",
issn = "1710-3568",
publisher = "Decker Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of gold sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations

AU - Schaffran, Robin M.

AU - Storrs, Frances

AU - Schalock, Peter

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - Background: The clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations is often unclear. Knowledge of the prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with and without gold dental restorations is required to better understand the relevance of these reactions. Objective: To determine the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to gold in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations (gold patients) compared with similar individuals without gold dental appliances (nongold patients). Methods: One hundred thirty-six healthy, asymptomatic patients were patch tested to gold sodium thiosulfate, nickel sulfate and palladium chloride. Readings occurred after 2 days and 7 days. Results: Of the patients tested, 24 of 71 (33.8%) gold patients had a positive reaction to gold versus 7 of 65 (10.8%) of the nongold patients, P <.001. Of those with a positive gold reaction, 12 of 31 (38.7%) also had a positive nickel reaction. Nickel alone was positive in 18 of 71 (25.4%) of gold patients versus 11 of 65 (16.9%) of nongold patients. 19 of 29 (65.5%) of those with a positive nickel reaction also reacted to palladium and 19 of 22 (86.4%) of those with a palladium reaction also reacted to nickel. The rate of allergy to gold computed over a 3-year period for patients patch tested in the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Contact Dermatitis Clinic was 13.5% (46/342). Conclusions: The prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with gold dental restorations is approximately 33.8%. This is significantly greater than the 10.8% prevalence seen in individuals without gold dental appliances, as well as greater than the 3-year rate from the OHSU Contact Dermatitis Clinic. This data should help shed light on issues of clinical relevance.

AB - Background: The clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations is often unclear. Knowledge of the prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with and without gold dental restorations is required to better understand the relevance of these reactions. Objective: To determine the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to gold in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations (gold patients) compared with similar individuals without gold dental appliances (nongold patients). Methods: One hundred thirty-six healthy, asymptomatic patients were patch tested to gold sodium thiosulfate, nickel sulfate and palladium chloride. Readings occurred after 2 days and 7 days. Results: Of the patients tested, 24 of 71 (33.8%) gold patients had a positive reaction to gold versus 7 of 65 (10.8%) of the nongold patients, P <.001. Of those with a positive gold reaction, 12 of 31 (38.7%) also had a positive nickel reaction. Nickel alone was positive in 18 of 71 (25.4%) of gold patients versus 11 of 65 (16.9%) of nongold patients. 19 of 29 (65.5%) of those with a positive nickel reaction also reacted to palladium and 19 of 22 (86.4%) of those with a palladium reaction also reacted to nickel. The rate of allergy to gold computed over a 3-year period for patients patch tested in the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Contact Dermatitis Clinic was 13.5% (46/342). Conclusions: The prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with gold dental restorations is approximately 33.8%. This is significantly greater than the 10.8% prevalence seen in individuals without gold dental appliances, as well as greater than the 3-year rate from the OHSU Contact Dermatitis Clinic. This data should help shed light on issues of clinical relevance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032727317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032727317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10594295

AN - SCOPUS:0032727317

VL - 10

SP - 201

EP - 206

JO - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug

JF - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug

SN - 1710-3568

IS - 4

ER -