Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration

Jennifer Hall, Deborah Cohen, Melinda Davis, Rose Gunn, Alexander Blount, David Pollack, William L. Miller, Corey Smith, Nancy Valentine, Benjamin F. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care.

METHODS: Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS: Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care teams. Training efforts exclusively targeting behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and new employees were incomplete if primary care clinicians (PCCs) and others in the practice also lacked experience working with BHCs and delivering integrated care. Organizations' methods for addressing employees' need for additional preparation included hiring a consultant to provide training, sending employees to external training programs, hosting residency or practicum training programs, or creating their own internal training program. Onboarding new employees through the development of training manuals; extensive shadowing processes; and protecting time for ongoing education, mentoring, and support opportunities for new and established clinicians and staff were featured in these internal training programs.

CONCLUSION: Insufficient training capacity and practical experience opportunities continue to be major barriers to supplying the workforce needed for effective behavioral health and primary care integration. Until the training capacity grows to meet the demand, practices must put forth considerable effort and resources to train their own employees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S41-S51
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Volume28
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Education
Geographic Locations
Ownership
Health
Internship and Residency
Consultants
Case-Control Studies
Interviews

Keywords

  • Behavioral Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Integrated
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. / Hall, Jennifer; Cohen, Deborah; Davis, Melinda; Gunn, Rose; Blount, Alexander; Pollack, David; Miller, William L.; Smith, Corey; Valentine, Nancy; Miller, Benjamin F.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, Vol. 28, 01.09.2015, p. S41-S51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hall, Jennifer ; Cohen, Deborah ; Davis, Melinda ; Gunn, Rose ; Blount, Alexander ; Pollack, David ; Miller, William L. ; Smith, Corey ; Valentine, Nancy ; Miller, Benjamin F. / Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. 2015 ; Vol. 28. pp. S41-S51.
@article{5546f119868949e0b63b55079edfc4c4,
title = "Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care teams. Training efforts exclusively targeting behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and new employees were incomplete if primary care clinicians (PCCs) and others in the practice also lacked experience working with BHCs and delivering integrated care. Organizations' methods for addressing employees' need for additional preparation included hiring a consultant to provide training, sending employees to external training programs, hosting residency or practicum training programs, or creating their own internal training program. Onboarding new employees through the development of training manuals; extensive shadowing processes; and protecting time for ongoing education, mentoring, and support opportunities for new and established clinicians and staff were featured in these internal training programs.CONCLUSION: Insufficient training capacity and practical experience opportunities continue to be major barriers to supplying the workforce needed for effective behavioral health and primary care integration. Until the training capacity grows to meet the demand, practices must put forth considerable effort and resources to train their own employees.",
keywords = "Behavioral Medicine, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research",
author = "Jennifer Hall and Deborah Cohen and Melinda Davis and Rose Gunn and Alexander Blount and David Pollack and Miller, {William L.} and Corey Smith and Nancy Valentine and Miller, {Benjamin F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "S41--S51",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration

AU - Hall, Jennifer

AU - Cohen, Deborah

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Gunn, Rose

AU - Blount, Alexander

AU - Pollack, David

AU - Miller, William L.

AU - Smith, Corey

AU - Valentine, Nancy

AU - Miller, Benjamin F.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care teams. Training efforts exclusively targeting behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and new employees were incomplete if primary care clinicians (PCCs) and others in the practice also lacked experience working with BHCs and delivering integrated care. Organizations' methods for addressing employees' need for additional preparation included hiring a consultant to provide training, sending employees to external training programs, hosting residency or practicum training programs, or creating their own internal training program. Onboarding new employees through the development of training manuals; extensive shadowing processes; and protecting time for ongoing education, mentoring, and support opportunities for new and established clinicians and staff were featured in these internal training programs.CONCLUSION: Insufficient training capacity and practical experience opportunities continue to be major barriers to supplying the workforce needed for effective behavioral health and primary care integration. Until the training capacity grows to meet the demand, practices must put forth considerable effort and resources to train their own employees.

AB - PURPOSE: To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care teams. Training efforts exclusively targeting behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and new employees were incomplete if primary care clinicians (PCCs) and others in the practice also lacked experience working with BHCs and delivering integrated care. Organizations' methods for addressing employees' need for additional preparation included hiring a consultant to provide training, sending employees to external training programs, hosting residency or practicum training programs, or creating their own internal training program. Onboarding new employees through the development of training manuals; extensive shadowing processes; and protecting time for ongoing education, mentoring, and support opportunities for new and established clinicians and staff were featured in these internal training programs.CONCLUSION: Insufficient training capacity and practical experience opportunities continue to be major barriers to supplying the workforce needed for effective behavioral health and primary care integration. Until the training capacity grows to meet the demand, practices must put forth considerable effort and resources to train their own employees.

KW - Behavioral Medicine

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Integrated

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Qualitative Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008662446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008662446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150054

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150054

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - S41-S51

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

ER -