TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration
AU - Hall, Jennifer
AU - Cohen, Deborah J.
AU - Davis, Melinda
AU - Gunn, Rose
AU - Blount, Alexander
AU - Pollack, David A.
AU - Miller, William L.
AU - Smith, Corey
AU - Valentine, Nancy
AU - Miller, Benjamin F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2015 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - PURPOSE: To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care teams. Training efforts exclusively targeting behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and new employees were incomplete if primary care clinicians (PCCs) and others in the practice also lacked experience working with BHCs and delivering integrated care. Organizations' methods for addressing employees' need for additional preparation included hiring a consultant to provide training, sending employees to external training programs, hosting residency or practicum training programs, or creating their own internal training program. Onboarding new employees through the development of training manuals; extensive shadowing processes; and protecting time for ongoing education, mentoring, and support opportunities for new and established clinicians and staff were featured in these internal training programs.CONCLUSION: Insufficient training capacity and practical experience opportunities continue to be major barriers to supplying the workforce needed for effective behavioral health and primary care integration. Until the training capacity grows to meet the demand, practices must put forth considerable effort and resources to train their own employees.
AB - PURPOSE: To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care teams. Training efforts exclusively targeting behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and new employees were incomplete if primary care clinicians (PCCs) and others in the practice also lacked experience working with BHCs and delivering integrated care. Organizations' methods for addressing employees' need for additional preparation included hiring a consultant to provide training, sending employees to external training programs, hosting residency or practicum training programs, or creating their own internal training program. Onboarding new employees through the development of training manuals; extensive shadowing processes; and protecting time for ongoing education, mentoring, and support opportunities for new and established clinicians and staff were featured in these internal training programs.CONCLUSION: Insufficient training capacity and practical experience opportunities continue to be major barriers to supplying the workforce needed for effective behavioral health and primary care integration. Until the training capacity grows to meet the demand, practices must put forth considerable effort and resources to train their own employees.
KW - Behavioral Medicine
KW - Delivery of Health Care
KW - Integrated
KW - Primary Health Care
KW - Qualitative Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008662446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008662446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150054
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150054
M3 - Article
C2 - 26359471
AN - SCOPUS:85008662446
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 28
SP - S41-S51
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
ER -