Preparing the personal physician for practice (P4): Site-specific innovations, hypotheses, and measures at baseline

Patricia (Patty) Carney, M (Patrice) Eiff, Larry A. Green, Erik Lindbloom, Samuel E. Jones, Jamie Osborn, John Saultz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to describe the innovations, hypotheses being tested, and measures used in residency training redesign in 14 family medicine residencies associated with the P4 project METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of site visit reports to identify and categorize the curricular innovations that are part of the P4 Project. Similarly, we cataloged specific hypotheses to be tested and both site-specific measures and core measures collected by the evaluation team to assess hypotheses. RESULTS: Selected P4 programs include three university-based programs; three community-based, university-administered programs, and eight community-based, university-affiliated programs. These 14 programs had 24 continuity clinics, and 334 residents were enrolled in the baseline cohort (2006-2007). Between two and five innovations were proposed by programs in the baseline period linked to 70 planned hypotheses, with a range of three to seven hypotheses (mean of 4.5). Seven programs (50%) focused on Patient-centered Medical Home practice redesign, and seven (50%) assessed different aspects of a 4-year curriculum as the two most common innovations. Team-based care and team training were tested in six programs, and five tested an individualized curriculum tailored to each resident. Eight programs submitted 11 grants, and six programs were successful in obtaining funding to support P4 activities. The sources of funding primarily included the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, and local foundations, and the mean number of dollars attained was $659,528 (range=$50,000-$2,500,000). Seven grants were received through local sources, totaling $3,219,884 with an average of $459,983 per program. CONCLUSIONS: The P4 project had a successful launch and to date has retained all 14 programs that started in 2007. Though no direct funding was provided by P4 to individual sites, all have focused on important contemporary challenges for training excellent family physicians, all are engaged in important evaluations, and nearly half have successfully obtained project funding to support their specific P4 activities during the baseline period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-471
Number of pages8
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume43
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Organized Financing
Internship and Residency
Physicians
Curriculum
United States Health Resources and Services Administration
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Patient-Centered Care
Family Physicians
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Preparing the personal physician for practice (P4) : Site-specific innovations, hypotheses, and measures at baseline. / Carney, Patricia (Patty); Eiff, M (Patrice); Green, Larry A.; Lindbloom, Erik; Jones, Samuel E.; Osborn, Jamie; Saultz, John.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 464-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{598ad8d020f6424f9d9063eb9bba3a59,
title = "Preparing the personal physician for practice (P4): Site-specific innovations, hypotheses, and measures at baseline",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to describe the innovations, hypotheses being tested, and measures used in residency training redesign in 14 family medicine residencies associated with the P4 project METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of site visit reports to identify and categorize the curricular innovations that are part of the P4 Project. Similarly, we cataloged specific hypotheses to be tested and both site-specific measures and core measures collected by the evaluation team to assess hypotheses. RESULTS: Selected P4 programs include three university-based programs; three community-based, university-administered programs, and eight community-based, university-affiliated programs. These 14 programs had 24 continuity clinics, and 334 residents were enrolled in the baseline cohort (2006-2007). Between two and five innovations were proposed by programs in the baseline period linked to 70 planned hypotheses, with a range of three to seven hypotheses (mean of 4.5). Seven programs (50{\%}) focused on Patient-centered Medical Home practice redesign, and seven (50{\%}) assessed different aspects of a 4-year curriculum as the two most common innovations. Team-based care and team training were tested in six programs, and five tested an individualized curriculum tailored to each resident. Eight programs submitted 11 grants, and six programs were successful in obtaining funding to support P4 activities. The sources of funding primarily included the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, and local foundations, and the mean number of dollars attained was $659,528 (range=$50,000-$2,500,000). Seven grants were received through local sources, totaling $3,219,884 with an average of $459,983 per program. CONCLUSIONS: The P4 project had a successful launch and to date has retained all 14 programs that started in 2007. Though no direct funding was provided by P4 to individual sites, all have focused on important contemporary challenges for training excellent family physicians, all are engaged in important evaluations, and nearly half have successfully obtained project funding to support their specific P4 activities during the baseline period.",
author = "Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Eiff, {M (Patrice)} and Green, {Larry A.} and Erik Lindbloom and Jones, {Samuel E.} and Jamie Osborn and John Saultz",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "464--471",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparing the personal physician for practice (P4)

T2 - Site-specific innovations, hypotheses, and measures at baseline

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Eiff, M (Patrice)

AU - Green, Larry A.

AU - Lindbloom, Erik

AU - Jones, Samuel E.

AU - Osborn, Jamie

AU - Saultz, John

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to describe the innovations, hypotheses being tested, and measures used in residency training redesign in 14 family medicine residencies associated with the P4 project METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of site visit reports to identify and categorize the curricular innovations that are part of the P4 Project. Similarly, we cataloged specific hypotheses to be tested and both site-specific measures and core measures collected by the evaluation team to assess hypotheses. RESULTS: Selected P4 programs include three university-based programs; three community-based, university-administered programs, and eight community-based, university-affiliated programs. These 14 programs had 24 continuity clinics, and 334 residents were enrolled in the baseline cohort (2006-2007). Between two and five innovations were proposed by programs in the baseline period linked to 70 planned hypotheses, with a range of three to seven hypotheses (mean of 4.5). Seven programs (50%) focused on Patient-centered Medical Home practice redesign, and seven (50%) assessed different aspects of a 4-year curriculum as the two most common innovations. Team-based care and team training were tested in six programs, and five tested an individualized curriculum tailored to each resident. Eight programs submitted 11 grants, and six programs were successful in obtaining funding to support P4 activities. The sources of funding primarily included the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, and local foundations, and the mean number of dollars attained was $659,528 (range=$50,000-$2,500,000). Seven grants were received through local sources, totaling $3,219,884 with an average of $459,983 per program. CONCLUSIONS: The P4 project had a successful launch and to date has retained all 14 programs that started in 2007. Though no direct funding was provided by P4 to individual sites, all have focused on important contemporary challenges for training excellent family physicians, all are engaged in important evaluations, and nearly half have successfully obtained project funding to support their specific P4 activities during the baseline period.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to describe the innovations, hypotheses being tested, and measures used in residency training redesign in 14 family medicine residencies associated with the P4 project METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of site visit reports to identify and categorize the curricular innovations that are part of the P4 Project. Similarly, we cataloged specific hypotheses to be tested and both site-specific measures and core measures collected by the evaluation team to assess hypotheses. RESULTS: Selected P4 programs include three university-based programs; three community-based, university-administered programs, and eight community-based, university-affiliated programs. These 14 programs had 24 continuity clinics, and 334 residents were enrolled in the baseline cohort (2006-2007). Between two and five innovations were proposed by programs in the baseline period linked to 70 planned hypotheses, with a range of three to seven hypotheses (mean of 4.5). Seven programs (50%) focused on Patient-centered Medical Home practice redesign, and seven (50%) assessed different aspects of a 4-year curriculum as the two most common innovations. Team-based care and team training were tested in six programs, and five tested an individualized curriculum tailored to each resident. Eight programs submitted 11 grants, and six programs were successful in obtaining funding to support P4 activities. The sources of funding primarily included the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, and local foundations, and the mean number of dollars attained was $659,528 (range=$50,000-$2,500,000). Seven grants were received through local sources, totaling $3,219,884 with an average of $459,983 per program. CONCLUSIONS: The P4 project had a successful launch and to date has retained all 14 programs that started in 2007. Though no direct funding was provided by P4 to individual sites, all have focused on important contemporary challenges for training excellent family physicians, all are engaged in important evaluations, and nearly half have successfully obtained project funding to support their specific P4 activities during the baseline period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960584812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960584812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21761377

AN - SCOPUS:79960584812

VL - 43

SP - 464

EP - 471

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 7

ER -