Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy

Muhammad F. Aslam, Blake Osmundsen, S(Renee) Edwards, Catherine Matthews, William (Tom) Gregory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Our aim was to determine if there was a correlation between the preoperative prolapse stage and postoperative recurrence of prolapse 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Our null hypothesis is that the preoperative stage of prolapse does not increase the risk of recurrence. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study from 3 centers.We included subjects who underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and completed a standardized 1-year follow-up from 2009-2014. All subjects underwent a complete preoperative evaluation and completed 12 months of follow-up with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination. We compared those subjects who met the definition of recurrence with those who did not, analyzing the following covariates: stage of prolapse using International Continence Society (ICS) definitions, individual pelvic organ prolapse quantification points, age, body mass index, race, exogenous estrogen use, menopause, smoking, vaginal parity, cesarean section, and performance of concomitant procedures. We defined recurrence as any prolapse beyond the hymen. Results: We had 125 women from 3 centers who met our criteria, with 23.2% of them having recurrence at 1 year. We found that recurrence increased as the preoperative ICS stage of prolapse increased (P =

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-160
Number of pages5
JournalFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Prolapse
Recurrence
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hymen
Robotics
Menopause
Parity
Cesarean Section
Multicenter Studies
Estrogens
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Smoking

Keywords

  • failure after sacrocolpopexy
  • preoperative risk factors
  • prolapse recurrence
  • prolapse surgery
  • sacrocolpopexy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgery
  • Urology

Cite this

Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy. / Aslam, Muhammad F.; Osmundsen, Blake; Edwards, S(Renee); Matthews, Catherine; Gregory, William (Tom).

In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 156-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79447e2a369a4aaab2c8b8873ee0b149,
title = "Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy",
abstract = "Objectives: Our aim was to determine if there was a correlation between the preoperative prolapse stage and postoperative recurrence of prolapse 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Our null hypothesis is that the preoperative stage of prolapse does not increase the risk of recurrence. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study from 3 centers.We included subjects who underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and completed a standardized 1-year follow-up from 2009-2014. All subjects underwent a complete preoperative evaluation and completed 12 months of follow-up with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination. We compared those subjects who met the definition of recurrence with those who did not, analyzing the following covariates: stage of prolapse using International Continence Society (ICS) definitions, individual pelvic organ prolapse quantification points, age, body mass index, race, exogenous estrogen use, menopause, smoking, vaginal parity, cesarean section, and performance of concomitant procedures. We defined recurrence as any prolapse beyond the hymen. Results: We had 125 women from 3 centers who met our criteria, with 23.2{\%} of them having recurrence at 1 year. We found that recurrence increased as the preoperative ICS stage of prolapse increased (P =",
keywords = "failure after sacrocolpopexy, preoperative risk factors, prolapse recurrence, prolapse surgery, sacrocolpopexy",
author = "Aslam, {Muhammad F.} and Blake Osmundsen and S(Renee) Edwards and Catherine Matthews and Gregory, {William (Tom)}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SPV.0000000000000233",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "156--160",
journal = "Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy

AU - Aslam, Muhammad F.

AU - Osmundsen, Blake

AU - Edwards, S(Renee)

AU - Matthews, Catherine

AU - Gregory, William (Tom)

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Objectives: Our aim was to determine if there was a correlation between the preoperative prolapse stage and postoperative recurrence of prolapse 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Our null hypothesis is that the preoperative stage of prolapse does not increase the risk of recurrence. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study from 3 centers.We included subjects who underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and completed a standardized 1-year follow-up from 2009-2014. All subjects underwent a complete preoperative evaluation and completed 12 months of follow-up with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination. We compared those subjects who met the definition of recurrence with those who did not, analyzing the following covariates: stage of prolapse using International Continence Society (ICS) definitions, individual pelvic organ prolapse quantification points, age, body mass index, race, exogenous estrogen use, menopause, smoking, vaginal parity, cesarean section, and performance of concomitant procedures. We defined recurrence as any prolapse beyond the hymen. Results: We had 125 women from 3 centers who met our criteria, with 23.2% of them having recurrence at 1 year. We found that recurrence increased as the preoperative ICS stage of prolapse increased (P =

AB - Objectives: Our aim was to determine if there was a correlation between the preoperative prolapse stage and postoperative recurrence of prolapse 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Our null hypothesis is that the preoperative stage of prolapse does not increase the risk of recurrence. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study from 3 centers.We included subjects who underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and completed a standardized 1-year follow-up from 2009-2014. All subjects underwent a complete preoperative evaluation and completed 12 months of follow-up with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination. We compared those subjects who met the definition of recurrence with those who did not, analyzing the following covariates: stage of prolapse using International Continence Society (ICS) definitions, individual pelvic organ prolapse quantification points, age, body mass index, race, exogenous estrogen use, menopause, smoking, vaginal parity, cesarean section, and performance of concomitant procedures. We defined recurrence as any prolapse beyond the hymen. Results: We had 125 women from 3 centers who met our criteria, with 23.2% of them having recurrence at 1 year. We found that recurrence increased as the preoperative ICS stage of prolapse increased (P =

KW - failure after sacrocolpopexy

KW - preoperative risk factors

KW - prolapse recurrence

KW - prolapse surgery

KW - sacrocolpopexy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968608634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968608634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000233

DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000233

M3 - Article

C2 - 26571435

AN - SCOPUS:84968608634

VL - 22

SP - 156

EP - 160

JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 2151-8378

IS - 3

ER -