Prehabilitation for adults diagnosed with cancer: A systematic review of long-term physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes

Sara Faithfull, Lauren Turner, Karen Poole, Mark Joy, Ralph Manders, Jennifer Weprin, Kerri Winters-Stone, John Saxton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Prehabilitation is increasingly being used to mitigate treatment-related complications and enhance recovery. An individual's state of health at diagnosis, including obesity, physical fitness and comorbidities, are influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse effects. This review explores whether prehabilitation works in improving health outcomes at or beyond the initial 30 days post-treatment and considers the utility of prehabilitation before cancer treatment. Methods: A database search was conducted for articles published with prehabilitation as a pre-cancer treatment intervention between 2009 and 2017. Studies with no 30 days post-treatment data were excluded. Outcomes post-prehabilitation were extracted for physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Sixteen randomised controlled trials with a combined 2017 participants and six observational studies with 289 participants were included. Prehabilitation interventions provided multi-modality components including exercise, nutrition and psychoeducational aspects. Prehabilitation improved gait, cardiopulmonary function, urinary continence, lung function and mood 30 days post-treatment but was not consistent across studies. Conclusion: When combined with rehabilitation, greater benefits were seen in 30-day gait and physical functioning compared to prehabilitation alone. Large-scale randomised studies are required to translate what is already known from feasibility studies to improve overall health and increase long-term cancer patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere13023
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Gait
Health
Therapeutics
Physical Fitness
Feasibility Studies
Observational Studies
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Comorbidity
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Obesity
Databases
Exercise
Lung

Keywords

  • cancer
  • exercise
  • nutrition
  • prehabilitation
  • rehabilitation
  • survivorship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Prehabilitation for adults diagnosed with cancer : A systematic review of long-term physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes. / Faithfull, Sara; Turner, Lauren; Poole, Karen; Joy, Mark; Manders, Ralph; Weprin, Jennifer; Winters-Stone, Kerri; Saxton, John.

In: European Journal of Cancer Care, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{850831ba2b7148859e0294b468c0df2c,
title = "Prehabilitation for adults diagnosed with cancer: A systematic review of long-term physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: Prehabilitation is increasingly being used to mitigate treatment-related complications and enhance recovery. An individual's state of health at diagnosis, including obesity, physical fitness and comorbidities, are influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse effects. This review explores whether prehabilitation works in improving health outcomes at or beyond the initial 30 days post-treatment and considers the utility of prehabilitation before cancer treatment. Methods: A database search was conducted for articles published with prehabilitation as a pre-cancer treatment intervention between 2009 and 2017. Studies with no 30 days post-treatment data were excluded. Outcomes post-prehabilitation were extracted for physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Sixteen randomised controlled trials with a combined 2017 participants and six observational studies with 289 participants were included. Prehabilitation interventions provided multi-modality components including exercise, nutrition and psychoeducational aspects. Prehabilitation improved gait, cardiopulmonary function, urinary continence, lung function and mood 30 days post-treatment but was not consistent across studies. Conclusion: When combined with rehabilitation, greater benefits were seen in 30-day gait and physical functioning compared to prehabilitation alone. Large-scale randomised studies are required to translate what is already known from feasibility studies to improve overall health and increase long-term cancer patient outcomes.",
keywords = "cancer, exercise, nutrition, prehabilitation, rehabilitation, survivorship",
author = "Sara Faithfull and Lauren Turner and Karen Poole and Mark Joy and Ralph Manders and Jennifer Weprin and Kerri Winters-Stone and John Saxton",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ecc.13023",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer Care",
issn = "0961-5423",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prehabilitation for adults diagnosed with cancer

T2 - A systematic review of long-term physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes

AU - Faithfull, Sara

AU - Turner, Lauren

AU - Poole, Karen

AU - Joy, Mark

AU - Manders, Ralph

AU - Weprin, Jennifer

AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri

AU - Saxton, John

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: Prehabilitation is increasingly being used to mitigate treatment-related complications and enhance recovery. An individual's state of health at diagnosis, including obesity, physical fitness and comorbidities, are influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse effects. This review explores whether prehabilitation works in improving health outcomes at or beyond the initial 30 days post-treatment and considers the utility of prehabilitation before cancer treatment. Methods: A database search was conducted for articles published with prehabilitation as a pre-cancer treatment intervention between 2009 and 2017. Studies with no 30 days post-treatment data were excluded. Outcomes post-prehabilitation were extracted for physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Sixteen randomised controlled trials with a combined 2017 participants and six observational studies with 289 participants were included. Prehabilitation interventions provided multi-modality components including exercise, nutrition and psychoeducational aspects. Prehabilitation improved gait, cardiopulmonary function, urinary continence, lung function and mood 30 days post-treatment but was not consistent across studies. Conclusion: When combined with rehabilitation, greater benefits were seen in 30-day gait and physical functioning compared to prehabilitation alone. Large-scale randomised studies are required to translate what is already known from feasibility studies to improve overall health and increase long-term cancer patient outcomes.

AB - Objective: Prehabilitation is increasingly being used to mitigate treatment-related complications and enhance recovery. An individual's state of health at diagnosis, including obesity, physical fitness and comorbidities, are influencing factors for the occurrence of adverse effects. This review explores whether prehabilitation works in improving health outcomes at or beyond the initial 30 days post-treatment and considers the utility of prehabilitation before cancer treatment. Methods: A database search was conducted for articles published with prehabilitation as a pre-cancer treatment intervention between 2009 and 2017. Studies with no 30 days post-treatment data were excluded. Outcomes post-prehabilitation were extracted for physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Sixteen randomised controlled trials with a combined 2017 participants and six observational studies with 289 participants were included. Prehabilitation interventions provided multi-modality components including exercise, nutrition and psychoeducational aspects. Prehabilitation improved gait, cardiopulmonary function, urinary continence, lung function and mood 30 days post-treatment but was not consistent across studies. Conclusion: When combined with rehabilitation, greater benefits were seen in 30-day gait and physical functioning compared to prehabilitation alone. Large-scale randomised studies are required to translate what is already known from feasibility studies to improve overall health and increase long-term cancer patient outcomes.

KW - cancer

KW - exercise

KW - nutrition

KW - prehabilitation

KW - rehabilitation

KW - survivorship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062791089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062791089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ecc.13023

DO - 10.1111/ecc.13023

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85062791089

JO - European Journal of Cancer Care

JF - European Journal of Cancer Care

SN - 0961-5423

M1 - e13023

ER -