Pregnancy impairs baroreflex control of heart rate in rats

Role of insulin sensitivity

Virginia Brooks, Julia M. Mulvaney, Afaf S. Azar, Ding Zhao, Robert K. Goldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies in rabbits suggest that insulin resistance and reduced brain insulin contribute to impaired baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) during pregnancy; however, the mechanisms are unknown. The rat model is ideal to investigate these mechanisms because much is known about rat brain baroreflex neurocircuitry and insulin receptor locations. However, it is unclear in rats whether pregnancy impairs the HR baroreflex or whether insulin resistance is involved. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that in rats pregnancy decreases HR baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and that this decrease is related to concurrent decreases in insulin sensitivity (IS). BRS was quantified before, during, and after pregnancy using complementary methods: 1) spontaneous BRS (sBRS) derived from sequence method analysis of telemetric, continuous arterial pressure recordings; and 2) maximal BRS of complete sigmoidal baroreflex relationships. IS was measured (hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp) to determine whether BRS and IS change in parallel. sBRS was reduced at midgestation [pregnancy day 10 (P10)], returned to nonpregnant (NP) levels on P18, and fell again at late gestation (P20) (sBRS in ms/mmHg: NP, 1.66 ± 0.04; P10, 1.17 ± 0.11; P18, 1.55 ± 0.12; P20, 1.31 ± 0.05; n = 5; P <0.05). Similar triphasic patterns were observed for both maximal BRS [in beats·min-1·mmHg-1: NP, 4.45 ± 0.52 (n = 10); P11-12, 2.76 ± 0.11 (n = 7); P17-18, 3.79 ± 0.14 (n = 5); P19-20, 2.32 ± 0.40 (n = 8); P <0.0001] and previous and current measurements of IS (in mg glucose·kg-1·min -1: NP, 32 ± 2; P19-20, 15 ± 1; P <0.0005). Furthermore, during pregnancy, the standard deviation (SD) of MAP increased, and the SD of HR decreased, indirectly suggesting baroreflex impairment. sBRS increased transiently during parturition, and sBRS, maximal BRS, and IS normalized 3-4 days postpartum. In conclusion, pregnancy decreases HR BRS in rats. The parallel temporal changes in BRS and IS suggest a mechanistic link.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Volume298
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Baroreflex
Insulin Resistance
Heart Rate
Pregnancy
Glucose Clamp Technique
Insulin Receptor
Brain
Postpartum Period
Sequence Analysis
Arterial Pressure

Keywords

  • Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp
  • Insulin resistance
  • Mean arterial pressure
  • Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity
  • Telemetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Pregnancy impairs baroreflex control of heart rate in rats : Role of insulin sensitivity. / Brooks, Virginia; Mulvaney, Julia M.; Azar, Afaf S.; Zhao, Ding; Goldman, Robert K.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol. 298, No. 2, 02.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11d4dc0a57804a169d7031cd4c79fdaa,
title = "Pregnancy impairs baroreflex control of heart rate in rats: Role of insulin sensitivity",
abstract = "Recent studies in rabbits suggest that insulin resistance and reduced brain insulin contribute to impaired baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) during pregnancy; however, the mechanisms are unknown. The rat model is ideal to investigate these mechanisms because much is known about rat brain baroreflex neurocircuitry and insulin receptor locations. However, it is unclear in rats whether pregnancy impairs the HR baroreflex or whether insulin resistance is involved. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that in rats pregnancy decreases HR baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and that this decrease is related to concurrent decreases in insulin sensitivity (IS). BRS was quantified before, during, and after pregnancy using complementary methods: 1) spontaneous BRS (sBRS) derived from sequence method analysis of telemetric, continuous arterial pressure recordings; and 2) maximal BRS of complete sigmoidal baroreflex relationships. IS was measured (hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp) to determine whether BRS and IS change in parallel. sBRS was reduced at midgestation [pregnancy day 10 (P10)], returned to nonpregnant (NP) levels on P18, and fell again at late gestation (P20) (sBRS in ms/mmHg: NP, 1.66 ± 0.04; P10, 1.17 ± 0.11; P18, 1.55 ± 0.12; P20, 1.31 ± 0.05; n = 5; P <0.05). Similar triphasic patterns were observed for both maximal BRS [in beats·min-1·mmHg-1: NP, 4.45 ± 0.52 (n = 10); P11-12, 2.76 ± 0.11 (n = 7); P17-18, 3.79 ± 0.14 (n = 5); P19-20, 2.32 ± 0.40 (n = 8); P <0.0001] and previous and current measurements of IS (in mg glucose·kg-1·min -1: NP, 32 ± 2; P19-20, 15 ± 1; P <0.0005). Furthermore, during pregnancy, the standard deviation (SD) of MAP increased, and the SD of HR decreased, indirectly suggesting baroreflex impairment. sBRS increased transiently during parturition, and sBRS, maximal BRS, and IS normalized 3-4 days postpartum. In conclusion, pregnancy decreases HR BRS in rats. The parallel temporal changes in BRS and IS suggest a mechanistic link.",
keywords = "Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, Insulin resistance, Mean arterial pressure, Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, Telemetry",
author = "Virginia Brooks and Mulvaney, {Julia M.} and Azar, {Afaf S.} and Ding Zhao and Goldman, {Robert K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1152/ajpregu.00441.2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "298",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology",
issn = "1931-857X",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pregnancy impairs baroreflex control of heart rate in rats

T2 - Role of insulin sensitivity

AU - Brooks, Virginia

AU - Mulvaney, Julia M.

AU - Azar, Afaf S.

AU - Zhao, Ding

AU - Goldman, Robert K.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Recent studies in rabbits suggest that insulin resistance and reduced brain insulin contribute to impaired baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) during pregnancy; however, the mechanisms are unknown. The rat model is ideal to investigate these mechanisms because much is known about rat brain baroreflex neurocircuitry and insulin receptor locations. However, it is unclear in rats whether pregnancy impairs the HR baroreflex or whether insulin resistance is involved. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that in rats pregnancy decreases HR baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and that this decrease is related to concurrent decreases in insulin sensitivity (IS). BRS was quantified before, during, and after pregnancy using complementary methods: 1) spontaneous BRS (sBRS) derived from sequence method analysis of telemetric, continuous arterial pressure recordings; and 2) maximal BRS of complete sigmoidal baroreflex relationships. IS was measured (hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp) to determine whether BRS and IS change in parallel. sBRS was reduced at midgestation [pregnancy day 10 (P10)], returned to nonpregnant (NP) levels on P18, and fell again at late gestation (P20) (sBRS in ms/mmHg: NP, 1.66 ± 0.04; P10, 1.17 ± 0.11; P18, 1.55 ± 0.12; P20, 1.31 ± 0.05; n = 5; P <0.05). Similar triphasic patterns were observed for both maximal BRS [in beats·min-1·mmHg-1: NP, 4.45 ± 0.52 (n = 10); P11-12, 2.76 ± 0.11 (n = 7); P17-18, 3.79 ± 0.14 (n = 5); P19-20, 2.32 ± 0.40 (n = 8); P <0.0001] and previous and current measurements of IS (in mg glucose·kg-1·min -1: NP, 32 ± 2; P19-20, 15 ± 1; P <0.0005). Furthermore, during pregnancy, the standard deviation (SD) of MAP increased, and the SD of HR decreased, indirectly suggesting baroreflex impairment. sBRS increased transiently during parturition, and sBRS, maximal BRS, and IS normalized 3-4 days postpartum. In conclusion, pregnancy decreases HR BRS in rats. The parallel temporal changes in BRS and IS suggest a mechanistic link.

AB - Recent studies in rabbits suggest that insulin resistance and reduced brain insulin contribute to impaired baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) during pregnancy; however, the mechanisms are unknown. The rat model is ideal to investigate these mechanisms because much is known about rat brain baroreflex neurocircuitry and insulin receptor locations. However, it is unclear in rats whether pregnancy impairs the HR baroreflex or whether insulin resistance is involved. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that in rats pregnancy decreases HR baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and that this decrease is related to concurrent decreases in insulin sensitivity (IS). BRS was quantified before, during, and after pregnancy using complementary methods: 1) spontaneous BRS (sBRS) derived from sequence method analysis of telemetric, continuous arterial pressure recordings; and 2) maximal BRS of complete sigmoidal baroreflex relationships. IS was measured (hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp) to determine whether BRS and IS change in parallel. sBRS was reduced at midgestation [pregnancy day 10 (P10)], returned to nonpregnant (NP) levels on P18, and fell again at late gestation (P20) (sBRS in ms/mmHg: NP, 1.66 ± 0.04; P10, 1.17 ± 0.11; P18, 1.55 ± 0.12; P20, 1.31 ± 0.05; n = 5; P <0.05). Similar triphasic patterns were observed for both maximal BRS [in beats·min-1·mmHg-1: NP, 4.45 ± 0.52 (n = 10); P11-12, 2.76 ± 0.11 (n = 7); P17-18, 3.79 ± 0.14 (n = 5); P19-20, 2.32 ± 0.40 (n = 8); P <0.0001] and previous and current measurements of IS (in mg glucose·kg-1·min -1: NP, 32 ± 2; P19-20, 15 ± 1; P <0.0005). Furthermore, during pregnancy, the standard deviation (SD) of MAP increased, and the SD of HR decreased, indirectly suggesting baroreflex impairment. sBRS increased transiently during parturition, and sBRS, maximal BRS, and IS normalized 3-4 days postpartum. In conclusion, pregnancy decreases HR BRS in rats. The parallel temporal changes in BRS and IS suggest a mechanistic link.

KW - Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp

KW - Insulin resistance

KW - Mean arterial pressure

KW - Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity

KW - Telemetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75449083559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75449083559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/ajpregu.00441.2009

DO - 10.1152/ajpregu.00441.2009

M3 - Article

VL - 298

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology

SN - 1931-857X

IS - 2

ER -