Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls

Christy C. Tomkins-Lane, Sara Christensen Holz, Karen S. Yamakawa, Vaishali Phalke, Doug J. Quint, Jennifer Miner, Andrew J. Haig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. Objective: To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University spine program. Participants: Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r 2=.41) and walking capacity (r 2=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups. Conclusions: BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-653
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume93
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Spinal Stenosis
Low Back Pain
Walking
Pain
Leg
Body Mass Index
Back Pain

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Obesity
  • Pain
  • Physiology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. / Tomkins-Lane, Christy C.; Holz, Sara Christensen; Yamakawa, Karen S.; Phalke, Vaishali; Quint, Doug J.; Miner, Jennifer; Haig, Andrew J.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 93, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 647-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tomkins-Lane, Christy C. ; Holz, Sara Christensen ; Yamakawa, Karen S. ; Phalke, Vaishali ; Quint, Doug J. ; Miner, Jennifer ; Haig, Andrew J. / Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012 ; Vol. 93, No. 4. pp. 647-653.
@article{a798dbd9c28f4673b0587af812c0617b,
title = "Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls",
abstract = "Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. Objective: To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University spine program. Participants: Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r 2=.41) and walking capacity (r 2=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups. Conclusions: BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.",
keywords = "Body mass index, Obesity, Pain, Physiology, Rehabilitation, Walking",
author = "Tomkins-Lane, {Christy C.} and Holz, {Sara Christensen} and Yamakawa, {Karen S.} and Vaishali Phalke and Quint, {Doug J.} and Jennifer Miner and Haig, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "647--653",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls

AU - Tomkins-Lane, Christy C.

AU - Holz, Sara Christensen

AU - Yamakawa, Karen S.

AU - Phalke, Vaishali

AU - Quint, Doug J.

AU - Miner, Jennifer

AU - Haig, Andrew J.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. Objective: To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University spine program. Participants: Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r 2=.41) and walking capacity (r 2=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups. Conclusions: BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.

AB - Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. Objective: To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University spine program. Participants: Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r 2=.41) and walking capacity (r 2=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups. Conclusions: BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.

KW - Body mass index

KW - Obesity

KW - Pain

KW - Physiology

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859216943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859216943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.023

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 22365377

AN - SCOPUS:84859216943

VL - 93

SP - 647

EP - 653

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 4

ER -