TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Modality Among Newly Age-Eligible Medicaid Enrollees
AU - Mojica, Cynthia M.
AU - Lind, Bonnie
AU - Gu, Yifan
AU - Coronado, Gloria D.
AU - Davis, Melinda M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University and Oregon State University Cancer Prevention and Control Initiative. Dr. Davis is supported by a Cancer Prevention, Control, Behavioral Sciences, and Populations Sciences Career Development Award from the National Cancer Institute (K07CA211971). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Knight Cancer Institute or the NIH. Neither of the study sponsors had any role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of findings, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit this manuscript for publication. The IRB at Oregon State University (#7800) and Oregon Health & Science University (# 15847) approved the study. From November 2014 to August 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research (KPCHR; Dr. Coronado served as a co-Investigator) participated in an industry-funded study to evaluate patient adherence to an experimental blood test for colorectal cancer. The study was funded by EpiGenomics. From September 2017 to June 2018, KPCHR (Dr. Coronado served as the Principal Investigator) participated in an industry-funded study to compare the clinical performance of an experimental fecal immunochemical test to a Food and Drug Administration–approved fecal immunochemical test. This study was funded by Quidel Corporation. Author responsibilities were as follows: funding acquisition (CMM, MMD), conceptualization (CMM, MMD), interpretation of findings (CMM, MMD, GDC), formal analysis (BL, YG), visualization (CMM, MMD, BL, YG, GDC), data curation (BL, YG), writing–original draft (CMM), writing–review and editing (MMD, BL, YG, GDC). From September 2017–September 2018, Dr. Coronado served as the Principal Investigator on an industry-funded study awarded to the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research to compare the clinical performance of an investigational fecal test to an Food and Drug Administration–approved investigational fecal test. The study was funded by Quidel Corporation. From July 2020 to present, Dr. Coronado has served as a consultant to Exact Sciences. Dr. Coronado declares no personal conflicts of interest. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
Funding Information:
The study was supported by the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University and Oregon State University Cancer Prevention and Control Initiative. Dr. Davis is supported by a Cancer Prevention, Control, Behavioral Sciences, and Populations Sciences Career Development Award from the National Cancer Institute (K07CA211971). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Knight Cancer Institute or the NIH. Neither of the study sponsors had any role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of findings, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit this manuscript for publication. The IRB at Oregon State University (#7800) and Oregon Health & Science University (# 15847) approved the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Introduction: This study examines individual- and practice-level predictors of screening modality among 1,484 Medicaid enrollees who initiated colorectal cancer screening (fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood tests or colonoscopy) within a year of turning age 50 years. Understanding screening modality patterns for patients and health systems can help optimize colorectal cancer screening initiatives that will lead to high screening completion rates. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression was conducted in 2019 to analyze Medicaid claims data (January 2013–June 2015) to explore predictors of colonoscopy screening (versus fecal testing). Results: Overall, 64% of enrollees received a colonoscopy and 36% received a fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Male (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.08, 1.37) compared with female enrollees and those with 4–6 (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.15, 2.15), 7–10 (OR=2.23, 95% CI=1.64, 3.03), and ≥11 (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.22, 2.65) primary care visits compared with 0–3 visits had higher odds of colonoscopy screening. Non-White, non-Hispanic enrollees (OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.58, 0.87) compared with White, non-Hispanics Whites had lower odds of colonoscopy screening. Practices with an endoscopy facility within their ZIP code (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.08, 2.08) compared with practices without a nearby endoscopy facility had higher odds of colonoscopy screening. Conclusions: Among newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees who received colorectal cancer screening, non-White, non-Hispanic individuals were less likely and male enrollees and those with ≥4 primary care visits were more likely to undergo colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy also was the more common modality among adults whose primary care clinic had an endoscopy facility in the same ZIP code. Future research is needed to fully understand patient, provider, and practice preferences regarding screening modality.
AB - Introduction: This study examines individual- and practice-level predictors of screening modality among 1,484 Medicaid enrollees who initiated colorectal cancer screening (fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood tests or colonoscopy) within a year of turning age 50 years. Understanding screening modality patterns for patients and health systems can help optimize colorectal cancer screening initiatives that will lead to high screening completion rates. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression was conducted in 2019 to analyze Medicaid claims data (January 2013–June 2015) to explore predictors of colonoscopy screening (versus fecal testing). Results: Overall, 64% of enrollees received a colonoscopy and 36% received a fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Male (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.08, 1.37) compared with female enrollees and those with 4–6 (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.15, 2.15), 7–10 (OR=2.23, 95% CI=1.64, 3.03), and ≥11 (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.22, 2.65) primary care visits compared with 0–3 visits had higher odds of colonoscopy screening. Non-White, non-Hispanic enrollees (OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.58, 0.87) compared with White, non-Hispanics Whites had lower odds of colonoscopy screening. Practices with an endoscopy facility within their ZIP code (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.08, 2.08) compared with practices without a nearby endoscopy facility had higher odds of colonoscopy screening. Conclusions: Among newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees who received colorectal cancer screening, non-White, non-Hispanic individuals were less likely and male enrollees and those with ≥4 primary care visits were more likely to undergo colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy also was the more common modality among adults whose primary care clinic had an endoscopy facility in the same ZIP code. Future research is needed to fully understand patient, provider, and practice preferences regarding screening modality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096531134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096531134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 33223363
AN - SCOPUS:85096531134
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 60
SP - 72
EP - 79
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 1
ER -