Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population

Robert J. Newman, Mark Darrow, Doyle M. Cummings, Valerie King, Lauren Whetstone, Suzanne Kelly, Eric Jalonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Exercise stress testing (EST) is a screening test for coronary artery disease. Previous studies from the cardiology literature show an overall sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 72% with variable predictive values depending on pretest probability. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the predictive value of EST in a family medicine population in eastern North Carolina. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 339 ESTs performed in a family medicine center from July 2001 to April 2005. EST results were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal. Outcomes studied from a review of outpatient and inpatient electronic medical record data and telephone follow-up included myocardial infarction, cardiac catheterization with angioplasty and stenting, coronary artery bypass grafting, a new diagnosis of coronary artery disease, and cardiac death. Mean duration of follow-up was 47 months, with a range of 27 to 72 months. Results: Nearly all patients had low to intermediate risk pretest probability. Five tests were positive, 32 were equivocal, and 302 were negative. There were 2 false-positive tests, both in female patients. There were 2 false-negative tests, both of which were treated with good outcomes. Two of 32 equivocal results had cardiac outcomes. Considering equivocal tests as positive, the overall sensitivity in this series was 71.4%; specificity was 90.4%. The positive predictive value was 13.5% and the negative predictive value was 99.3%. Conclusions: The high negative predictive value for EST in this outpatient family medicine population is noteworthy and reassuring. EST is a cost-effective strategy for triaging the common complaint of chest pain in low- to intermediate-risk patients in primary care practices and should be included in the services offered to family medicine patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-538
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Medicine
Exercise
Population
Coronary Artery Disease
Outpatients
Electronic Health Records
Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiology
Chest Pain
Angioplasty
Telephone
Coronary Artery Bypass
Inpatients
Primary Health Care
Myocardial Infarction
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population. / Newman, Robert J.; Darrow, Mark; Cummings, Doyle M.; King, Valerie; Whetstone, Lauren; Kelly, Suzanne; Jalonen, Eric.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 6, 11.2008, p. 531-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newman, Robert J. ; Darrow, Mark ; Cummings, Doyle M. ; King, Valerie ; Whetstone, Lauren ; Kelly, Suzanne ; Jalonen, Eric. / Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 531-538.
@article{bfff4ef019b24b99a58c1cecd5e0a6ec,
title = "Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population",
abstract = "Purpose: Exercise stress testing (EST) is a screening test for coronary artery disease. Previous studies from the cardiology literature show an overall sensitivity of 67{\%} and specificity of 72{\%} with variable predictive values depending on pretest probability. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the predictive value of EST in a family medicine population in eastern North Carolina. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 339 ESTs performed in a family medicine center from July 2001 to April 2005. EST results were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal. Outcomes studied from a review of outpatient and inpatient electronic medical record data and telephone follow-up included myocardial infarction, cardiac catheterization with angioplasty and stenting, coronary artery bypass grafting, a new diagnosis of coronary artery disease, and cardiac death. Mean duration of follow-up was 47 months, with a range of 27 to 72 months. Results: Nearly all patients had low to intermediate risk pretest probability. Five tests were positive, 32 were equivocal, and 302 were negative. There were 2 false-positive tests, both in female patients. There were 2 false-negative tests, both of which were treated with good outcomes. Two of 32 equivocal results had cardiac outcomes. Considering equivocal tests as positive, the overall sensitivity in this series was 71.4{\%}; specificity was 90.4{\%}. The positive predictive value was 13.5{\%} and the negative predictive value was 99.3{\%}. Conclusions: The high negative predictive value for EST in this outpatient family medicine population is noteworthy and reassuring. EST is a cost-effective strategy for triaging the common complaint of chest pain in low- to intermediate-risk patients in primary care practices and should be included in the services offered to family medicine patients.",
author = "Newman, {Robert J.} and Mark Darrow and Cummings, {Doyle M.} and Valerie King and Lauren Whetstone and Suzanne Kelly and Eric Jalonen",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.070257",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "531--538",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive value of exercise stress testing in a family medicine population

AU - Newman, Robert J.

AU - Darrow, Mark

AU - Cummings, Doyle M.

AU - King, Valerie

AU - Whetstone, Lauren

AU - Kelly, Suzanne

AU - Jalonen, Eric

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Purpose: Exercise stress testing (EST) is a screening test for coronary artery disease. Previous studies from the cardiology literature show an overall sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 72% with variable predictive values depending on pretest probability. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the predictive value of EST in a family medicine population in eastern North Carolina. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 339 ESTs performed in a family medicine center from July 2001 to April 2005. EST results were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal. Outcomes studied from a review of outpatient and inpatient electronic medical record data and telephone follow-up included myocardial infarction, cardiac catheterization with angioplasty and stenting, coronary artery bypass grafting, a new diagnosis of coronary artery disease, and cardiac death. Mean duration of follow-up was 47 months, with a range of 27 to 72 months. Results: Nearly all patients had low to intermediate risk pretest probability. Five tests were positive, 32 were equivocal, and 302 were negative. There were 2 false-positive tests, both in female patients. There were 2 false-negative tests, both of which were treated with good outcomes. Two of 32 equivocal results had cardiac outcomes. Considering equivocal tests as positive, the overall sensitivity in this series was 71.4%; specificity was 90.4%. The positive predictive value was 13.5% and the negative predictive value was 99.3%. Conclusions: The high negative predictive value for EST in this outpatient family medicine population is noteworthy and reassuring. EST is a cost-effective strategy for triaging the common complaint of chest pain in low- to intermediate-risk patients in primary care practices and should be included in the services offered to family medicine patients.

AB - Purpose: Exercise stress testing (EST) is a screening test for coronary artery disease. Previous studies from the cardiology literature show an overall sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 72% with variable predictive values depending on pretest probability. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the predictive value of EST in a family medicine population in eastern North Carolina. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 339 ESTs performed in a family medicine center from July 2001 to April 2005. EST results were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal. Outcomes studied from a review of outpatient and inpatient electronic medical record data and telephone follow-up included myocardial infarction, cardiac catheterization with angioplasty and stenting, coronary artery bypass grafting, a new diagnosis of coronary artery disease, and cardiac death. Mean duration of follow-up was 47 months, with a range of 27 to 72 months. Results: Nearly all patients had low to intermediate risk pretest probability. Five tests were positive, 32 were equivocal, and 302 were negative. There were 2 false-positive tests, both in female patients. There were 2 false-negative tests, both of which were treated with good outcomes. Two of 32 equivocal results had cardiac outcomes. Considering equivocal tests as positive, the overall sensitivity in this series was 71.4%; specificity was 90.4%. The positive predictive value was 13.5% and the negative predictive value was 99.3%. Conclusions: The high negative predictive value for EST in this outpatient family medicine population is noteworthy and reassuring. EST is a cost-effective strategy for triaging the common complaint of chest pain in low- to intermediate-risk patients in primary care practices and should be included in the services offered to family medicine patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56749095582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56749095582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.070257

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.070257

M3 - Article

C2 - 18988720

AN - SCOPUS:56749095582

VL - 21

SP - 531

EP - 538

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 6

ER -