Practice patterns in endoscopic skull base surgery: Survey of the American Rhinologic Society

Jivianne T. Lee, Todd T. Kingdom, Timothy Smith, Michael Setzen, Seth Brown, Pete S. Batra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The introduction of advanced endoscopic techniques has facilitated significant growth in the field of endoscopic skull base surgery (SBS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of endoscopic SBS on the clinical practice patterns of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership. Methods: A 23-item survey vetted by the ARS Board of Directors was electronically disseminated to the ARS membership from February 5, 2013, to March 31, 2013. The target group encompassed 982 ARS members. Results: A total of 152 physicians (15.5%) completed the survey. Open and endoscopic skull base procedures were performed by 41% and 94% of the respondents, respectively. During a typical year, the number of endoscopic skull base cases ranged from 0 to 20 in 56%, 21 to 50 in 26%, 51 to 100 in 9%, and >100 in 8%. Endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair (96%) and transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (81%) were the most commonly performed procedures, followed by transcribriform (68.4%), transplanum (54.4%), and transclival (49.6%) approaches. Overall, 69.6% used endoscopy for resections of malignant sinus/skull base lesions. Considerable variation in Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding philosophy was observed, with open skull base (32%), unlisted endoscopic (29%), sinus surgery (24%), and unlisted neurosurgical (15%) codes employed by surgeons. Only 29% of physicians reported adequate reimbursement in ≥75% of cases. Eighty-five percent of respondents supported creation of dedicated endoscopic SBS codes. Conclusion: This study illustrates the widespread integration of endoscopic SBS procedures into rhinologic clinical practice among survey respondents. However, current variability in coding strategies and inadequate reimbursement may warrant development of specific guidelines to standardize coding and billing processes in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-131
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Skull Base
Current Procedural Terminology
Physicians' Practice Patterns
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Endoscopy
Guidelines
Growth

Keywords

  • Data collection
  • Endoscopy
  • Practice pattern
  • Skull base
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Practice patterns in endoscopic skull base surgery : Survey of the American Rhinologic Society. / Lee, Jivianne T.; Kingdom, Todd T.; Smith, Timothy; Setzen, Michael; Brown, Seth; Batra, Pete S.

In: International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 124-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Jivianne T. ; Kingdom, Todd T. ; Smith, Timothy ; Setzen, Michael ; Brown, Seth ; Batra, Pete S. / Practice patterns in endoscopic skull base surgery : Survey of the American Rhinologic Society. In: International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 124-131.
@article{0f77ecced7d9477f8210d4f26497f8c1,
title = "Practice patterns in endoscopic skull base surgery: Survey of the American Rhinologic Society",
abstract = "Background: The introduction of advanced endoscopic techniques has facilitated significant growth in the field of endoscopic skull base surgery (SBS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of endoscopic SBS on the clinical practice patterns of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership. Methods: A 23-item survey vetted by the ARS Board of Directors was electronically disseminated to the ARS membership from February 5, 2013, to March 31, 2013. The target group encompassed 982 ARS members. Results: A total of 152 physicians (15.5{\%}) completed the survey. Open and endoscopic skull base procedures were performed by 41{\%} and 94{\%} of the respondents, respectively. During a typical year, the number of endoscopic skull base cases ranged from 0 to 20 in 56{\%}, 21 to 50 in 26{\%}, 51 to 100 in 9{\%}, and >100 in 8{\%}. Endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair (96{\%}) and transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (81{\%}) were the most commonly performed procedures, followed by transcribriform (68.4{\%}), transplanum (54.4{\%}), and transclival (49.6{\%}) approaches. Overall, 69.6{\%} used endoscopy for resections of malignant sinus/skull base lesions. Considerable variation in Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding philosophy was observed, with open skull base (32{\%}), unlisted endoscopic (29{\%}), sinus surgery (24{\%}), and unlisted neurosurgical (15{\%}) codes employed by surgeons. Only 29{\%} of physicians reported adequate reimbursement in ≥75{\%} of cases. Eighty-five percent of respondents supported creation of dedicated endoscopic SBS codes. Conclusion: This study illustrates the widespread integration of endoscopic SBS procedures into rhinologic clinical practice among survey respondents. However, current variability in coding strategies and inadequate reimbursement may warrant development of specific guidelines to standardize coding and billing processes in the future.",
keywords = "Data collection, Endoscopy, Practice pattern, Skull base, Surgery",
author = "Lee, {Jivianne T.} and Kingdom, {Todd T.} and Timothy Smith and Michael Setzen and Seth Brown and Batra, {Pete S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/alr.21248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "124--131",
journal = "International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology",
issn = "2042-6976",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice patterns in endoscopic skull base surgery

T2 - Survey of the American Rhinologic Society

AU - Lee, Jivianne T.

AU - Kingdom, Todd T.

AU - Smith, Timothy

AU - Setzen, Michael

AU - Brown, Seth

AU - Batra, Pete S.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Background: The introduction of advanced endoscopic techniques has facilitated significant growth in the field of endoscopic skull base surgery (SBS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of endoscopic SBS on the clinical practice patterns of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership. Methods: A 23-item survey vetted by the ARS Board of Directors was electronically disseminated to the ARS membership from February 5, 2013, to March 31, 2013. The target group encompassed 982 ARS members. Results: A total of 152 physicians (15.5%) completed the survey. Open and endoscopic skull base procedures were performed by 41% and 94% of the respondents, respectively. During a typical year, the number of endoscopic skull base cases ranged from 0 to 20 in 56%, 21 to 50 in 26%, 51 to 100 in 9%, and >100 in 8%. Endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair (96%) and transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (81%) were the most commonly performed procedures, followed by transcribriform (68.4%), transplanum (54.4%), and transclival (49.6%) approaches. Overall, 69.6% used endoscopy for resections of malignant sinus/skull base lesions. Considerable variation in Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding philosophy was observed, with open skull base (32%), unlisted endoscopic (29%), sinus surgery (24%), and unlisted neurosurgical (15%) codes employed by surgeons. Only 29% of physicians reported adequate reimbursement in ≥75% of cases. Eighty-five percent of respondents supported creation of dedicated endoscopic SBS codes. Conclusion: This study illustrates the widespread integration of endoscopic SBS procedures into rhinologic clinical practice among survey respondents. However, current variability in coding strategies and inadequate reimbursement may warrant development of specific guidelines to standardize coding and billing processes in the future.

AB - Background: The introduction of advanced endoscopic techniques has facilitated significant growth in the field of endoscopic skull base surgery (SBS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of endoscopic SBS on the clinical practice patterns of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership. Methods: A 23-item survey vetted by the ARS Board of Directors was electronically disseminated to the ARS membership from February 5, 2013, to March 31, 2013. The target group encompassed 982 ARS members. Results: A total of 152 physicians (15.5%) completed the survey. Open and endoscopic skull base procedures were performed by 41% and 94% of the respondents, respectively. During a typical year, the number of endoscopic skull base cases ranged from 0 to 20 in 56%, 21 to 50 in 26%, 51 to 100 in 9%, and >100 in 8%. Endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair (96%) and transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (81%) were the most commonly performed procedures, followed by transcribriform (68.4%), transplanum (54.4%), and transclival (49.6%) approaches. Overall, 69.6% used endoscopy for resections of malignant sinus/skull base lesions. Considerable variation in Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding philosophy was observed, with open skull base (32%), unlisted endoscopic (29%), sinus surgery (24%), and unlisted neurosurgical (15%) codes employed by surgeons. Only 29% of physicians reported adequate reimbursement in ≥75% of cases. Eighty-five percent of respondents supported creation of dedicated endoscopic SBS codes. Conclusion: This study illustrates the widespread integration of endoscopic SBS procedures into rhinologic clinical practice among survey respondents. However, current variability in coding strategies and inadequate reimbursement may warrant development of specific guidelines to standardize coding and billing processes in the future.

KW - Data collection

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Practice pattern

KW - Skull base

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893360161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893360161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/alr.21248

DO - 10.1002/alr.21248

M3 - Article

C2 - 24254982

AN - SCOPUS:84893360161

VL - 4

SP - 124

EP - 131

JO - International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

JF - International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

SN - 2042-6976

IS - 2

ER -