Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU

Erin K. Kross, Ruth A. Engelberg, Sarah Shannon, J. Randall Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: After-death surveys are an important source of information about the quality of end-of-life care, but response rates generally are low. Our goal was to understand the potential for nonresponse bias in survey studies of family members after a patient's death in the hospital ICU by identifying differences in patient demographics and delivery of palliative care between patients whose families respond to a survey about end-of-life care and those whose families do not. Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients who died in the ICU at 14 hospitals. Surveys were mailed to family members 1 to 2 months after the patient's death. Chart abstraction was completed on all patients, assessing demographic characteristics and previously validated indicators of palliative care. Results: Of the 2,016 surveys sent to families, 760 were returned, for a response rate of 38%. Patients whose family members returned the surveys were more likely to be white (88% vs 74%, respectively; p < 0.001); to be older (71 years vs 69 years, respectively; p = 0.015); and to have received more indicators of palliative care, including medical record documentation of family present at death, involvement of spiritual care, and dying after a decision to limit life-sustaining therapies (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients whose family members responded to a survey about end-of-life care were more likely to be white, older, and have indicators of palliative care documented in the medical record. Because these patients likely received higher quality palliative care, these findings suggest that the response bias in end-of-life care research is toward overestimating the quality of palliative care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00685893.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1496-1502
Number of pages7
JournalChest
Volume136
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Palliative Care
Quality of Health Care
Medical Records
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Documentation
Cohort Studies
Quality of Life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Kross, E. K., Engelberg, R. A., Shannon, S., & Curtis, J. R. (2009). Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU. Chest, 136(6), 1496-1502. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-0589

Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU. / Kross, Erin K.; Engelberg, Ruth A.; Shannon, Sarah; Curtis, J. Randall.

In: Chest, Vol. 136, No. 6, 01.12.2009, p. 1496-1502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kross, EK, Engelberg, RA, Shannon, S & Curtis, JR 2009, 'Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU', Chest, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1496-1502. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-0589
Kross, Erin K. ; Engelberg, Ruth A. ; Shannon, Sarah ; Curtis, J. Randall. / Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU. In: Chest. 2009 ; Vol. 136, No. 6. pp. 1496-1502.
@article{5370cb04691344748ffa74a1629ffa29,
title = "Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU",
abstract = "Background: After-death surveys are an important source of information about the quality of end-of-life care, but response rates generally are low. Our goal was to understand the potential for nonresponse bias in survey studies of family members after a patient's death in the hospital ICU by identifying differences in patient demographics and delivery of palliative care between patients whose families respond to a survey about end-of-life care and those whose families do not. Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients who died in the ICU at 14 hospitals. Surveys were mailed to family members 1 to 2 months after the patient's death. Chart abstraction was completed on all patients, assessing demographic characteristics and previously validated indicators of palliative care. Results: Of the 2,016 surveys sent to families, 760 were returned, for a response rate of 38{\%}. Patients whose family members returned the surveys were more likely to be white (88{\%} vs 74{\%}, respectively; p < 0.001); to be older (71 years vs 69 years, respectively; p = 0.015); and to have received more indicators of palliative care, including medical record documentation of family present at death, involvement of spiritual care, and dying after a decision to limit life-sustaining therapies (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients whose family members responded to a survey about end-of-life care were more likely to be white, older, and have indicators of palliative care documented in the medical record. Because these patients likely received higher quality palliative care, these findings suggest that the response bias in end-of-life care research is toward overestimating the quality of palliative care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00685893.",
author = "Kross, {Erin K.} and Engelberg, {Ruth A.} and Sarah Shannon and Curtis, {J. Randall}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.09-0589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "1496--1502",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential for response bias in family surveys about end-of-life care in the ICU

AU - Kross, Erin K.

AU - Engelberg, Ruth A.

AU - Shannon, Sarah

AU - Curtis, J. Randall

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Background: After-death surveys are an important source of information about the quality of end-of-life care, but response rates generally are low. Our goal was to understand the potential for nonresponse bias in survey studies of family members after a patient's death in the hospital ICU by identifying differences in patient demographics and delivery of palliative care between patients whose families respond to a survey about end-of-life care and those whose families do not. Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients who died in the ICU at 14 hospitals. Surveys were mailed to family members 1 to 2 months after the patient's death. Chart abstraction was completed on all patients, assessing demographic characteristics and previously validated indicators of palliative care. Results: Of the 2,016 surveys sent to families, 760 were returned, for a response rate of 38%. Patients whose family members returned the surveys were more likely to be white (88% vs 74%, respectively; p < 0.001); to be older (71 years vs 69 years, respectively; p = 0.015); and to have received more indicators of palliative care, including medical record documentation of family present at death, involvement of spiritual care, and dying after a decision to limit life-sustaining therapies (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients whose family members responded to a survey about end-of-life care were more likely to be white, older, and have indicators of palliative care documented in the medical record. Because these patients likely received higher quality palliative care, these findings suggest that the response bias in end-of-life care research is toward overestimating the quality of palliative care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00685893.

AB - Background: After-death surveys are an important source of information about the quality of end-of-life care, but response rates generally are low. Our goal was to understand the potential for nonresponse bias in survey studies of family members after a patient's death in the hospital ICU by identifying differences in patient demographics and delivery of palliative care between patients whose families respond to a survey about end-of-life care and those whose families do not. Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients who died in the ICU at 14 hospitals. Surveys were mailed to family members 1 to 2 months after the patient's death. Chart abstraction was completed on all patients, assessing demographic characteristics and previously validated indicators of palliative care. Results: Of the 2,016 surveys sent to families, 760 were returned, for a response rate of 38%. Patients whose family members returned the surveys were more likely to be white (88% vs 74%, respectively; p < 0.001); to be older (71 years vs 69 years, respectively; p = 0.015); and to have received more indicators of palliative care, including medical record documentation of family present at death, involvement of spiritual care, and dying after a decision to limit life-sustaining therapies (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients whose family members responded to a survey about end-of-life care were more likely to be white, older, and have indicators of palliative care documented in the medical record. Because these patients likely received higher quality palliative care, these findings suggest that the response bias in end-of-life care research is toward overestimating the quality of palliative care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00685893.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73149116425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73149116425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.09-0589

DO - 10.1378/chest.09-0589

M3 - Article

C2 - 19617402

AN - SCOPUS:73149116425

VL - 136

SP - 1496

EP - 1502

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -