Posttraumatic growth and well-being among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer: a longitudinal study

O. Husson, B. Zebrack, R. Block, L. Embry, C. Aguilar, Brandon Hayes-Lattin, S. Cole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines posttraumatic growth (PTG) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, as well as its correlates and trajectories over time. The study also explores the buffering role of PTG on the associations between posttraumatic stress (PTS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and psychological distress. Methods: A multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted among AYA cancer patients aged 14–39 years. One hundred sixty-nine patients completed a self-report measure of PTG (PTGI) and PTS (PDS) 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline (within the first 4 months of diagnosis). At 24-month follow-up, HRQoL (SF-36) and psychological distress (BSI-18) were also assessed. Results: Among participants, 14% showed increasing PTG, 45% remained at a stable high PTG level, 14% showed decreasing PTG, and 27% remained at a stable low PTG level. AYAs who remained high on PTG were more often younger, female, and received chemotherapy. PTG level at 6-month follow-up was predictive of mental HRQoL (β = 0.19; p = 0.026) and psychological distress (β = −0.14; p = 0.043) at 24-month follow-up when corrected for PTS and sociodemographic and clinical covariates. No relationship between PTG and physical HRQoL was found. The interactive effects of PTS and PTG on outcomes were not significant, indicating that buffering did not take place. Conclusion: This study indicates that PTG is dynamic and predicts mental well-being outcomes but does not buffer the effects of PTS. Psychosocial interventions should focus on promoting PTG and reducing PTS in order to promote the adjustment of AYAs diagnosed with cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 19 2017

Fingerprint

Child Welfare
Longitudinal Studies
Young Adult
Growth
Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Psychology
Social Adjustment
Self Report
Mental Health
Buffers
Prospective Studies
Drug Therapy

Keywords

  • Adolescent and young adult
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Oncology
  • Posttraumatic growth
  • Posttraumatic stress
  • Psychological distress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Posttraumatic growth and well-being among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer : a longitudinal study. / Husson, O.; Zebrack, B.; Block, R.; Embry, L.; Aguilar, C.; Hayes-Lattin, Brandon; Cole, S.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, 19.04.2017, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02bdb5f490d5472ebd6caeca181862ed,
title = "Posttraumatic growth and well-being among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer: a longitudinal study",
abstract = "Purpose: This study examines posttraumatic growth (PTG) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, as well as its correlates and trajectories over time. The study also explores the buffering role of PTG on the associations between posttraumatic stress (PTS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and psychological distress. Methods: A multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted among AYA cancer patients aged 14–39 years. One hundred sixty-nine patients completed a self-report measure of PTG (PTGI) and PTS (PDS) 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline (within the first 4 months of diagnosis). At 24-month follow-up, HRQoL (SF-36) and psychological distress (BSI-18) were also assessed. Results: Among participants, 14{\%} showed increasing PTG, 45{\%} remained at a stable high PTG level, 14{\%} showed decreasing PTG, and 27{\%} remained at a stable low PTG level. AYAs who remained high on PTG were more often younger, female, and received chemotherapy. PTG level at 6-month follow-up was predictive of mental HRQoL (β = 0.19; p = 0.026) and psychological distress (β = −0.14; p = 0.043) at 24-month follow-up when corrected for PTS and sociodemographic and clinical covariates. No relationship between PTG and physical HRQoL was found. The interactive effects of PTS and PTG on outcomes were not significant, indicating that buffering did not take place. Conclusion: This study indicates that PTG is dynamic and predicts mental well-being outcomes but does not buffer the effects of PTS. Psychosocial interventions should focus on promoting PTG and reducing PTS in order to promote the adjustment of AYAs diagnosed with cancer.",
keywords = "Adolescent and young adult, Health-related quality of life, Oncology, Posttraumatic growth, Posttraumatic stress, Psychological distress",
author = "O. Husson and B. Zebrack and R. Block and L. Embry and C. Aguilar and Brandon Hayes-Lattin and S. Cole",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-017-3707-7",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Posttraumatic growth and well-being among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer

T2 - a longitudinal study

AU - Husson, O.

AU - Zebrack, B.

AU - Block, R.

AU - Embry, L.

AU - Aguilar, C.

AU - Hayes-Lattin, Brandon

AU - Cole, S.

PY - 2017/4/19

Y1 - 2017/4/19

N2 - Purpose: This study examines posttraumatic growth (PTG) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, as well as its correlates and trajectories over time. The study also explores the buffering role of PTG on the associations between posttraumatic stress (PTS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and psychological distress. Methods: A multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted among AYA cancer patients aged 14–39 years. One hundred sixty-nine patients completed a self-report measure of PTG (PTGI) and PTS (PDS) 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline (within the first 4 months of diagnosis). At 24-month follow-up, HRQoL (SF-36) and psychological distress (BSI-18) were also assessed. Results: Among participants, 14% showed increasing PTG, 45% remained at a stable high PTG level, 14% showed decreasing PTG, and 27% remained at a stable low PTG level. AYAs who remained high on PTG were more often younger, female, and received chemotherapy. PTG level at 6-month follow-up was predictive of mental HRQoL (β = 0.19; p = 0.026) and psychological distress (β = −0.14; p = 0.043) at 24-month follow-up when corrected for PTS and sociodemographic and clinical covariates. No relationship between PTG and physical HRQoL was found. The interactive effects of PTS and PTG on outcomes were not significant, indicating that buffering did not take place. Conclusion: This study indicates that PTG is dynamic and predicts mental well-being outcomes but does not buffer the effects of PTS. Psychosocial interventions should focus on promoting PTG and reducing PTS in order to promote the adjustment of AYAs diagnosed with cancer.

AB - Purpose: This study examines posttraumatic growth (PTG) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, as well as its correlates and trajectories over time. The study also explores the buffering role of PTG on the associations between posttraumatic stress (PTS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and psychological distress. Methods: A multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted among AYA cancer patients aged 14–39 years. One hundred sixty-nine patients completed a self-report measure of PTG (PTGI) and PTS (PDS) 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline (within the first 4 months of diagnosis). At 24-month follow-up, HRQoL (SF-36) and psychological distress (BSI-18) were also assessed. Results: Among participants, 14% showed increasing PTG, 45% remained at a stable high PTG level, 14% showed decreasing PTG, and 27% remained at a stable low PTG level. AYAs who remained high on PTG were more often younger, female, and received chemotherapy. PTG level at 6-month follow-up was predictive of mental HRQoL (β = 0.19; p = 0.026) and psychological distress (β = −0.14; p = 0.043) at 24-month follow-up when corrected for PTS and sociodemographic and clinical covariates. No relationship between PTG and physical HRQoL was found. The interactive effects of PTS and PTG on outcomes were not significant, indicating that buffering did not take place. Conclusion: This study indicates that PTG is dynamic and predicts mental well-being outcomes but does not buffer the effects of PTS. Psychosocial interventions should focus on promoting PTG and reducing PTS in order to promote the adjustment of AYAs diagnosed with cancer.

KW - Adolescent and young adult

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Oncology

KW - Posttraumatic growth

KW - Posttraumatic stress

KW - Psychological distress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017719892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017719892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-017-3707-7

DO - 10.1007/s00520-017-3707-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 28424888

AN - SCOPUS:85017719892

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

ER -