TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative Infections in Dermatologic Surgery
T2 - The Role of Wound Cultures
AU - Ken, Kimberly M.
AU - Johnson, Mariah M.
AU - Leitenberger, Justin J.
AU - Neal, Donald E.
AU - Etzkorn, Jeremy R.
AU - Govas, Panayiota
AU - Carroll, Bryan T.
AU - Badawi, Ahmed H.
AU - Mudigonda, Tejaswi
AU - Council, M. Laurin
AU - Avila, Christina
AU - Carr, David R.
AU - Sasaki, Jodie
AU - Blalock, Travis W.
AU - Golda, Nicholas J.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgery is associated with low postoperative infection rates, averaging from approximately 1% to 4.25%. Often, postoperative infections are treated empirically based on clinical diagnosis of infection, given it can take 48 to 72 hours for a wound culture to identify a pathogen. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of empiric antibiotics in dermatologic surgery postoperative infections and if wound cultures change postoperative antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A 7-center, retrospective analysis of postoperative infections, with culture data, in dermatologic surgery patients was performed. RESULTS: Of 91 cases of clinically diagnosed postoperative infection, 82.4% (n = 75) were successfully treated with empiric oral antibiotics (95% confidence interval [0.73-0.89], p < .0001). In 16 (17.6%) cases, initial empiric antibiotics were unsuccessful, and wound culture results altered antibiotic therapy in 9 cases (9.9%) with 6 (6.6%) of these cases requiring additional coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). CONCLUSION: Empiric antibiotic treatment is usually appropriate for patients with postoperative surgical-site infections with wound cultures altering antibiotic management in a minority of cases. When empiric antibiotics fail, lack of MRSA coverage is usually the cause; therefore, providers should be aware of local MRSA prevalence and susceptibilities.
AB - BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgery is associated with low postoperative infection rates, averaging from approximately 1% to 4.25%. Often, postoperative infections are treated empirically based on clinical diagnosis of infection, given it can take 48 to 72 hours for a wound culture to identify a pathogen. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of empiric antibiotics in dermatologic surgery postoperative infections and if wound cultures change postoperative antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A 7-center, retrospective analysis of postoperative infections, with culture data, in dermatologic surgery patients was performed. RESULTS: Of 91 cases of clinically diagnosed postoperative infection, 82.4% (n = 75) were successfully treated with empiric oral antibiotics (95% confidence interval [0.73-0.89], p < .0001). In 16 (17.6%) cases, initial empiric antibiotics were unsuccessful, and wound culture results altered antibiotic therapy in 9 cases (9.9%) with 6 (6.6%) of these cases requiring additional coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). CONCLUSION: Empiric antibiotic treatment is usually appropriate for patients with postoperative surgical-site infections with wound cultures altering antibiotic management in a minority of cases. When empiric antibiotics fail, lack of MRSA coverage is usually the cause; therefore, providers should be aware of local MRSA prevalence and susceptibilities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092332351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092332351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002317
DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002317
M3 - Article
C2 - 31977498
AN - SCOPUS:85092332351
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 46
SP - 1294
EP - 1299
JO - Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
JF - Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
IS - 10
ER -