Policies and practices near the end of life in the us: The ambivalent pursuit of a good death

David Barnard

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter I will argue that these contradictions, and several more that I will describe in more detail below, reflect two prominent characteristics of American society. Many Americans place a very high value on control, and also lack widelY shared frameworks qf meaning within which to experience death and dying. These characteristics lead in turn to two forms of ambivalence in the face of death, that manifest themselves at the level of social policy. One is the all-out effort to forestall death, followed by an insistence on painless, quick death once curative efforts fail. The other is a view of hospice and palliative care that expects more of them than they can deliver (i.e., the perfectly managed death) even while the society refuses to fund them adequately in the competition for limited health care resources. Care for the terminally ill, in other words, provides an excellent opportunity to observe the interplay between cultural meanings, professional practices, and public policy, which is one of the major themes of this book.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCaring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.
Subtitle of host publicationPractices and Policies
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages172-187
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781134594139
ISBN (Print)0415223520, 9780415510721
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

death
hospice
dying
ambivalence
medical care
public policy
health care
lack
resources
experience
Society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Barnard, D. (2013). Policies and practices near the end of life in the us: The ambivalent pursuit of a good death. In Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.: Practices and Policies (pp. 172-187). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464472-19

Policies and practices near the end of life in the us : The ambivalent pursuit of a good death. / Barnard, David.

Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.: Practices and Policies. Taylor and Francis, 2013. p. 172-187.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Barnard, D 2013, Policies and practices near the end of life in the us: The ambivalent pursuit of a good death. in Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.: Practices and Policies. Taylor and Francis, pp. 172-187. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464472-19
Barnard D. Policies and practices near the end of life in the us: The ambivalent pursuit of a good death. In Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.: Practices and Policies. Taylor and Francis. 2013. p. 172-187 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464472-19
Barnard, David. / Policies and practices near the end of life in the us : The ambivalent pursuit of a good death. Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.: Practices and Policies. Taylor and Francis, 2013. pp. 172-187
@inbook{6ddac730337144cebba76095e4afd8df,
title = "Policies and practices near the end of life in the us: The ambivalent pursuit of a good death",
abstract = "In this chapter I will argue that these contradictions, and several more that I will describe in more detail below, reflect two prominent characteristics of American society. Many Americans place a very high value on control, and also lack widelY shared frameworks qf meaning within which to experience death and dying. These characteristics lead in turn to two forms of ambivalence in the face of death, that manifest themselves at the level of social policy. One is the all-out effort to forestall death, followed by an insistence on painless, quick death once curative efforts fail. The other is a view of hospice and palliative care that expects more of them than they can deliver (i.e., the perfectly managed death) even while the society refuses to fund them adequately in the competition for limited health care resources. Care for the terminally ill, in other words, provides an excellent opportunity to observe the interplay between cultural meanings, professional practices, and public policy, which is one of the major themes of this book.",
author = "David Barnard",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203464472-19",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0415223520",
pages = "172--187",
booktitle = "Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Policies and practices near the end of life in the us

T2 - The ambivalent pursuit of a good death

AU - Barnard, David

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - In this chapter I will argue that these contradictions, and several more that I will describe in more detail below, reflect two prominent characteristics of American society. Many Americans place a very high value on control, and also lack widelY shared frameworks qf meaning within which to experience death and dying. These characteristics lead in turn to two forms of ambivalence in the face of death, that manifest themselves at the level of social policy. One is the all-out effort to forestall death, followed by an insistence on painless, quick death once curative efforts fail. The other is a view of hospice and palliative care that expects more of them than they can deliver (i.e., the perfectly managed death) even while the society refuses to fund them adequately in the competition for limited health care resources. Care for the terminally ill, in other words, provides an excellent opportunity to observe the interplay between cultural meanings, professional practices, and public policy, which is one of the major themes of this book.

AB - In this chapter I will argue that these contradictions, and several more that I will describe in more detail below, reflect two prominent characteristics of American society. Many Americans place a very high value on control, and also lack widelY shared frameworks qf meaning within which to experience death and dying. These characteristics lead in turn to two forms of ambivalence in the face of death, that manifest themselves at the level of social policy. One is the all-out effort to forestall death, followed by an insistence on painless, quick death once curative efforts fail. The other is a view of hospice and palliative care that expects more of them than they can deliver (i.e., the perfectly managed death) even while the society refuses to fund them adequately in the competition for limited health care resources. Care for the terminally ill, in other words, provides an excellent opportunity to observe the interplay between cultural meanings, professional practices, and public policy, which is one of the major themes of this book.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071592228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071592228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203464472-19

DO - 10.4324/9780203464472-19

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85071592228

SN - 0415223520

SN - 9780415510721

SP - 172

EP - 187

BT - Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the U.S.

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -