Physician Practice Change I: A Critical Review and Description of an Integrated Systems Model

Mark Albanese, George Mejicano, George Xakellis, Patricia Kokotailo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The long lag time between medical discovery and when Americans benefit from that discovery has a huge cost in terms of morbidity and mortality. Medicine needs more effective methods for moving discovery to practice. In this article, the authors first offer a critical review of the models of structure and change process gleaned from the physician change literature. Next, they describe the Integrated Systems Model (ISM) that they derive from this review. The ISM has four major components: superstructure, change motivators, change process, and functional interactions. The ISM considers the physician practice to operate as a complex adaptive system requiring diversion of resources from reserves to make a change. In the ISM, resource return is a function of improved quality of care and reimbursement for services. Changes decreasing the resources of the system (parasitic) will be harder to make than those that increase resources (symbiotic) because of resistance to resource loss. The authors extend the ISM to the individual level and describe the need to consider whether individuals within the practice have sufficient reserves to fulfill their part in making the change. Any given change is generally competing with other changes for adoption. Finally, the authors consider the strengths and weaknesses of their model, concluding that by keeping patient welfare, quality care, and finances in the forefront, the ISM provides a more complete picture of forces affecting medical practice change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1043-1055
Number of pages13
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume84
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
integrated system
system model
physician
Physicians
resources
Medicine
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
medical practice
morbidity
finance
mortality
welfare
medicine
costs
interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Physician Practice Change I : A Critical Review and Description of an Integrated Systems Model. / Albanese, Mark; Mejicano, George; Xakellis, George; Kokotailo, Patricia.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 84, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 1043-1055.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Albanese, Mark ; Mejicano, George ; Xakellis, George ; Kokotailo, Patricia. / Physician Practice Change I : A Critical Review and Description of an Integrated Systems Model. In: Academic Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 84, No. 8. pp. 1043-1055.
@article{5df47650ba0c476bbab77ca97cfec3b5,
title = "Physician Practice Change I: A Critical Review and Description of an Integrated Systems Model",
abstract = "The long lag time between medical discovery and when Americans benefit from that discovery has a huge cost in terms of morbidity and mortality. Medicine needs more effective methods for moving discovery to practice. In this article, the authors first offer a critical review of the models of structure and change process gleaned from the physician change literature. Next, they describe the Integrated Systems Model (ISM) that they derive from this review. The ISM has four major components: superstructure, change motivators, change process, and functional interactions. The ISM considers the physician practice to operate as a complex adaptive system requiring diversion of resources from reserves to make a change. In the ISM, resource return is a function of improved quality of care and reimbursement for services. Changes decreasing the resources of the system (parasitic) will be harder to make than those that increase resources (symbiotic) because of resistance to resource loss. The authors extend the ISM to the individual level and describe the need to consider whether individuals within the practice have sufficient reserves to fulfill their part in making the change. Any given change is generally competing with other changes for adoption. Finally, the authors consider the strengths and weaknesses of their model, concluding that by keeping patient welfare, quality care, and finances in the forefront, the ISM provides a more complete picture of forces affecting medical practice change.",
author = "Mark Albanese and George Mejicano and George Xakellis and Patricia Kokotailo",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad1d45",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1043--1055",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician Practice Change I

T2 - A Critical Review and Description of an Integrated Systems Model

AU - Albanese, Mark

AU - Mejicano, George

AU - Xakellis, George

AU - Kokotailo, Patricia

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - The long lag time between medical discovery and when Americans benefit from that discovery has a huge cost in terms of morbidity and mortality. Medicine needs more effective methods for moving discovery to practice. In this article, the authors first offer a critical review of the models of structure and change process gleaned from the physician change literature. Next, they describe the Integrated Systems Model (ISM) that they derive from this review. The ISM has four major components: superstructure, change motivators, change process, and functional interactions. The ISM considers the physician practice to operate as a complex adaptive system requiring diversion of resources from reserves to make a change. In the ISM, resource return is a function of improved quality of care and reimbursement for services. Changes decreasing the resources of the system (parasitic) will be harder to make than those that increase resources (symbiotic) because of resistance to resource loss. The authors extend the ISM to the individual level and describe the need to consider whether individuals within the practice have sufficient reserves to fulfill their part in making the change. Any given change is generally competing with other changes for adoption. Finally, the authors consider the strengths and weaknesses of their model, concluding that by keeping patient welfare, quality care, and finances in the forefront, the ISM provides a more complete picture of forces affecting medical practice change.

AB - The long lag time between medical discovery and when Americans benefit from that discovery has a huge cost in terms of morbidity and mortality. Medicine needs more effective methods for moving discovery to practice. In this article, the authors first offer a critical review of the models of structure and change process gleaned from the physician change literature. Next, they describe the Integrated Systems Model (ISM) that they derive from this review. The ISM has four major components: superstructure, change motivators, change process, and functional interactions. The ISM considers the physician practice to operate as a complex adaptive system requiring diversion of resources from reserves to make a change. In the ISM, resource return is a function of improved quality of care and reimbursement for services. Changes decreasing the resources of the system (parasitic) will be harder to make than those that increase resources (symbiotic) because of resistance to resource loss. The authors extend the ISM to the individual level and describe the need to consider whether individuals within the practice have sufficient reserves to fulfill their part in making the change. Any given change is generally competing with other changes for adoption. Finally, the authors consider the strengths and weaknesses of their model, concluding that by keeping patient welfare, quality care, and finances in the forefront, the ISM provides a more complete picture of forces affecting medical practice change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949167605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949167605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad1d45

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad1d45

M3 - Article

C2 - 19638770

AN - SCOPUS:68949167605

VL - 84

SP - 1043

EP - 1055

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 8

ER -