Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage

Todd A. Loehrl, Timothy Smith, Albert Merati, Laura Torrico-Brusky, Raymond G. Hoffman, Robert J. Toohill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients commonly present with complaints of postnasal drainage (PND). This study reports the pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients without rhinitis/rhinosinusitis who present with complaints of PND. Methods: This is a prospective study of patients presenting with PND but no historical or endoscopic evidence of rhinitis/rhinosinusitis. Twenty-four-hour pharyngeal pH probe studies were done on 32 consecutive patients and compared with historical controls. Results: There were a total of 32 patients with PND (mean age, 54 years) and 51 controls (mean age, 49 years). The proportion of patients with positive pH probe studies was higher in PND (28.1%) versus controls (17.6%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.27). However, when comparing the mean number of pharyngeal acid exposure events, patients with PND had significantly more events (1.6) than controls (0.3; p <0.002). In addition, the mean acid exposure time was significantly higher in PND (0.18%) versus controls (0.01%; p <0.004). Conclusion: The proportion of patients with PND displaying positive pharyngeal 24 pH probe studies is not significantly greater than controls. However, patients with PND do exhibit a statistically greater degree of pharyngeal acid exposure as compared with controls. Additional research is required to delineate the role of pharyngeal reflux in patients with PND.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)340-343
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume19
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Drainage
Rhinitis
Acids
Prospective Studies
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Loehrl, T. A., Smith, T., Merati, A., Torrico-Brusky, L., Hoffman, R. G., & Toohill, R. J. (2005). Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage. American Journal of Rhinology, 19(4), 340-343.

Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage. / Loehrl, Todd A.; Smith, Timothy; Merati, Albert; Torrico-Brusky, Laura; Hoffman, Raymond G.; Toohill, Robert J.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 340-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loehrl, TA, Smith, T, Merati, A, Torrico-Brusky, L, Hoffman, RG & Toohill, RJ 2005, 'Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage', American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 340-343.
Loehrl TA, Smith T, Merati A, Torrico-Brusky L, Hoffman RG, Toohill RJ. Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage. American Journal of Rhinology. 2005 Jul;19(4):340-343.
Loehrl, Todd A. ; Smith, Timothy ; Merati, Albert ; Torrico-Brusky, Laura ; Hoffman, Raymond G. ; Toohill, Robert J. / Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2005 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 340-343.
@article{709a22f3852e4f448a7ac5d159efe02e,
title = "Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage",
abstract = "Background: Patients commonly present with complaints of postnasal drainage (PND). This study reports the pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients without rhinitis/rhinosinusitis who present with complaints of PND. Methods: This is a prospective study of patients presenting with PND but no historical or endoscopic evidence of rhinitis/rhinosinusitis. Twenty-four-hour pharyngeal pH probe studies were done on 32 consecutive patients and compared with historical controls. Results: There were a total of 32 patients with PND (mean age, 54 years) and 51 controls (mean age, 49 years). The proportion of patients with positive pH probe studies was higher in PND (28.1{\%}) versus controls (17.6{\%}) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.27). However, when comparing the mean number of pharyngeal acid exposure events, patients with PND had significantly more events (1.6) than controls (0.3; p <0.002). In addition, the mean acid exposure time was significantly higher in PND (0.18{\%}) versus controls (0.01{\%}; p <0.004). Conclusion: The proportion of patients with PND displaying positive pharyngeal 24 pH probe studies is not significantly greater than controls. However, patients with PND do exhibit a statistically greater degree of pharyngeal acid exposure as compared with controls. Additional research is required to delineate the role of pharyngeal reflux in patients with PND.",
author = "Loehrl, {Todd A.} and Timothy Smith and Albert Merati and Laura Torrico-Brusky and Hoffman, {Raymond G.} and Toohill, {Robert J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "340--343",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients with postnasal drainage

AU - Loehrl, Todd A.

AU - Smith, Timothy

AU - Merati, Albert

AU - Torrico-Brusky, Laura

AU - Hoffman, Raymond G.

AU - Toohill, Robert J.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Background: Patients commonly present with complaints of postnasal drainage (PND). This study reports the pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients without rhinitis/rhinosinusitis who present with complaints of PND. Methods: This is a prospective study of patients presenting with PND but no historical or endoscopic evidence of rhinitis/rhinosinusitis. Twenty-four-hour pharyngeal pH probe studies were done on 32 consecutive patients and compared with historical controls. Results: There were a total of 32 patients with PND (mean age, 54 years) and 51 controls (mean age, 49 years). The proportion of patients with positive pH probe studies was higher in PND (28.1%) versus controls (17.6%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.27). However, when comparing the mean number of pharyngeal acid exposure events, patients with PND had significantly more events (1.6) than controls (0.3; p <0.002). In addition, the mean acid exposure time was significantly higher in PND (0.18%) versus controls (0.01%; p <0.004). Conclusion: The proportion of patients with PND displaying positive pharyngeal 24 pH probe studies is not significantly greater than controls. However, patients with PND do exhibit a statistically greater degree of pharyngeal acid exposure as compared with controls. Additional research is required to delineate the role of pharyngeal reflux in patients with PND.

AB - Background: Patients commonly present with complaints of postnasal drainage (PND). This study reports the pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients without rhinitis/rhinosinusitis who present with complaints of PND. Methods: This is a prospective study of patients presenting with PND but no historical or endoscopic evidence of rhinitis/rhinosinusitis. Twenty-four-hour pharyngeal pH probe studies were done on 32 consecutive patients and compared with historical controls. Results: There were a total of 32 patients with PND (mean age, 54 years) and 51 controls (mean age, 49 years). The proportion of patients with positive pH probe studies was higher in PND (28.1%) versus controls (17.6%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.27). However, when comparing the mean number of pharyngeal acid exposure events, patients with PND had significantly more events (1.6) than controls (0.3; p <0.002). In addition, the mean acid exposure time was significantly higher in PND (0.18%) versus controls (0.01%; p <0.004). Conclusion: The proportion of patients with PND displaying positive pharyngeal 24 pH probe studies is not significantly greater than controls. However, patients with PND do exhibit a statistically greater degree of pharyngeal acid exposure as compared with controls. Additional research is required to delineate the role of pharyngeal reflux in patients with PND.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144455551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144455551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16171165

AN - SCOPUS:25144455551

VL - 19

SP - 340

EP - 343

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 4

ER -