TY - JOUR
T1 - Personalized Research on Diet in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease
T2 - A Series of N-of-1 Diet Trials
AU - Kaplan, Heather C.
AU - Opipari-Arrigan, Lisa
AU - Yang, Jiabei
AU - Schmid, Christopher H.
AU - Schuler, Christine L.
AU - Saeed, Shehzad A.
AU - Braly, Kimberly L.
AU - Chang, Fandi
AU - Murphy, Lauren
AU - Dodds, Cassandra M.
AU - Nuding, Mason
AU - Liu, Hao
AU - Pilley, Sheri
AU - Stone, Julie
AU - Woodward, Gisele
AU - Yokois, Nancy
AU - Goyal, Alka
AU - Lee, Dale
AU - Yeh, Ann Ming
AU - Lee, Peter
AU - Gold, Benjamin D.
AU - Molle-Rios, Zarela
AU - Jeff Zwiener, R.
AU - Ali, Sabina
AU - Chavannes, Mallory
AU - Linville, Tiffany
AU - Patel, Ashish
AU - Ayers, Travis
AU - Bassett, Mikelle
AU - Boyle, Brendan
AU - Palomo, Pablo
AU - Verstraete, Sofia
AU - Dorsey, Jill
AU - Kaplan, Jess L.
AU - Steiner, Steven J.
AU - Nguyen, Kaylie
AU - Burgis, Jennifer
AU - Suskind, David L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support: This research was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (PPRND-1507-31321) and a grant from the Kenneth Rainin Foundation (2019-1250). The study sponsors had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in the writing of the report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION:Evidence about specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. We conducted 54 single-subject, double-crossover N-of-1 trials comparing SCD with a modified SCD (MSCD) and comparing each with the participant's baseline, usual diet (UD).METHODS:Across 19 sites, we recruited patients aged 7-18 years with IBD and active inflammation. Following a 2-week baseline (UD), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 sequences of 4 alternating 8-week SCD and MSCD periods. Outcomes included fecal calprotectin and patient-reported symptoms. We report posterior probabilities from Bayesian models comparing diets.RESULTS:Twenty-one (39%) participants completed the trial, 9 (17%) completed a single crossover, and 24 (44%) withdrew. Withdrawal or early completion occurred commonly (lack of response [n = 11], adverse events [n = 11], and not desiring to continue [n = 6]). SCD and MSCD performed similarly for most individuals. On average, there was <1% probability of a clinically meaningful difference in IBD symptoms between SCD and MSCD. The average treatment difference was-0.3 (95% credible interval-1.2, 0.75). There was no significant difference in the ratio of fecal calprotectin geometric means comparing SCD and MSCD (0.77, 95% credible interval 0.51, 1.10). Some individuals had improvement in symptoms and fecal calprotectin compared with their UD, whereas others did not.DISCUSSION:SCD and MSCD did not consistently improve symptoms or inflammation, although some individuals may have benefited. However, there are inherent difficulties in examining dietary changes that complicate study design and ultimately conclusions regarding effectiveness.
AB - INTRODUCTION:Evidence about specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. We conducted 54 single-subject, double-crossover N-of-1 trials comparing SCD with a modified SCD (MSCD) and comparing each with the participant's baseline, usual diet (UD).METHODS:Across 19 sites, we recruited patients aged 7-18 years with IBD and active inflammation. Following a 2-week baseline (UD), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 sequences of 4 alternating 8-week SCD and MSCD periods. Outcomes included fecal calprotectin and patient-reported symptoms. We report posterior probabilities from Bayesian models comparing diets.RESULTS:Twenty-one (39%) participants completed the trial, 9 (17%) completed a single crossover, and 24 (44%) withdrew. Withdrawal or early completion occurred commonly (lack of response [n = 11], adverse events [n = 11], and not desiring to continue [n = 6]). SCD and MSCD performed similarly for most individuals. On average, there was <1% probability of a clinically meaningful difference in IBD symptoms between SCD and MSCD. The average treatment difference was-0.3 (95% credible interval-1.2, 0.75). There was no significant difference in the ratio of fecal calprotectin geometric means comparing SCD and MSCD (0.77, 95% credible interval 0.51, 1.10). Some individuals had improvement in symptoms and fecal calprotectin compared with their UD, whereas others did not.DISCUSSION:SCD and MSCD did not consistently improve symptoms or inflammation, although some individuals may have benefited. However, there are inherent difficulties in examining dietary changes that complicate study design and ultimately conclusions regarding effectiveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131701982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131701982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001800
DO - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001800
M3 - Article
C2 - 35442220
AN - SCOPUS:85131701982
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 117
SP - 902
EP - 917
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 6
ER -